If running stock 20s, what can I expect the rated mileage difference between a mxp vs LR+? While I don't need the performance aspect of the mxp, local pricing and inventory are better than comparable LR+. I do like using my cars for periodic road trips but am used to a model 3 LR with about 270mi at 100% charge.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Raven model x performance vs LR+ range
- Thread starter Nizzore
- Start date
scottf200
Well-Known Member
I just added them both to Compare Cars Side-by-Side and saw there was a difference.
Did you do that?
Oh cool site, thanks. Looks like on paper it's 351 vs 305 respectively. So at 90% real world that's about 40 miles of range in ideal conditions.
I'd expect them to be closer on the highway under light loads where the front motor is doing most of the work. Under city driving conditions, the Perfornce cars seem to bias a lot more oomph to the back than my Long Range, makes it feel like more of a rear-drive vehicle, but that also means a lot more heat losses from the big motor
Also keep in mind you're probably looking at 280 miles of "rated" range on a 30-50,000 mile Perfrormance from degradation at this point.
So, real-world, 80mph long raod trip freeway, maybe 250 100% to 0% (what I actually observe on mine, give or take) vs. 230 for the performance on the same tire? Only one way to find out!
Also keep in mind you're probably looking at 280 miles of "rated" range on a 30-50,000 mile Perfrormance from degradation at this point.
So, real-world, 80mph long raod trip freeway, maybe 250 100% to 0% (what I actually observe on mine, give or take) vs. 230 for the performance on the same tire? Only one way to find out!
