I just have no words... I'm no longer sure I want to do anything with Tesla cars:
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Refreshed 2021+ Model X and Model X Plaid waiting room
- Thread starter Tiger
- Start date
Redmiata98
Member
mr-dmitry, It appears that you are either a troll or just having an incredible run of bad luck. Which is it?
Unintended acceleration has been disproven on every single occasion. @wk057 had a lengthy investigation where he basically proved it is literally impossible
When one doesn't have luck in cards, one has luck in love!
Can you say more details about "physical controls input" and the "symptoms" you have experienced. We all want to know.
Is this what you said in your own thread about overheating? LOL
Somehow I can't
Empty tank
MXLR/BLK/Cream/20"/FSD Delivered 6/15/22 Flawless
Then it makes a case that if one purchases FSD, it should automatically change over to the same owner's new vehicle ( as long as it's an equivalent one-for-one purchase with Tesla).
Given phantom errors, are you able to protest/negotiate anything lower than 100? There's too many issues with other cars cutting one off to make it feasible to have this.This is so cool if I keep a 100 score its only $120View attachment 795119
He has been around the forums for a while and is legit. Probably would be reasonable to hear him out.
Exactly! We've been a constant 99 score - trying to get FSD beta. We have a lot of 100 score days in the mix but overall still a 99 total. All it takes is one person to pull out in front of you and you are forced to hit your breaks - or someone cuts in front of you and decreases your following distance. You get dinged for both - although its a small amount and we still have a 99 - that's not 100 score and wouldn't qualify for that awesome rate.
...or take a corner fast because the guy behind is tailing you and you'd rather not end up in an accident. It's comical because it doesn't catch things like not using a turn signal for a lane change or turns or illegal U-turns. I doubt whether the inside camera can decide whether someone actually looks before doing lane changes or backing up too - along with many, many other issues that are actually part of the rules of the road. This a fictional set of criteria that shouldn't be implemented until it's fully vetted.
If this is the case, the law is anti competitive and should be challenged. Also, Tesla wouldn’t be able to offer even a lower rate for a 100 vs a 90, or the law is capricious and should be overthrown.
Basically, if this is the case, Tesla’s whole insurance model is not possible in California, because as far as I know, Tesla’s insurance rates are based on individual risk.
usctrojan98
Member
Tesla, like other insurance companies, has to rely on static driving record. Not dynamic.
How static? Monthly? Annually? Lifetime?
Should be challenged.
It’s anticompetitive
Unintended does not necessarily equal malfunction
I hear you but I think one of the great aspects of Tesla is just doing stuff, since they are constantly iterating.
They don’t always get it right on first try. And they are trying so many things I think they are struggling constantly to keep up with all the development needed.
But at least they TRY. They do stuff. They move the needle forward.
Similar threads
- Marketplace listing
- Marketplace listing