TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Repetitive posting and unrestrained complaints

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by Auzie, Oct 3, 2015.

  1. Auzie

    Auzie Tree Hugger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,903
    Location:
    Sydney
    #1 Auzie, Oct 3, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2015
    I quite enjoy reading TMC threads. Highlights for me are threads in which the experts in their field contribute their thoughts and experiences.


    This morning I came across one of my highlight threads


    Dragtime P90D Ludicrous 0-60mph and 0-100mph video


    There was some interesting discussion between few experienced race car drivers that was capturing my interest when suddenly there is a post like this:


    P90DL is not yet meeting the Tesla specs
    That post derailed the discussion down the thread and interjected Tesla Motors related customer complaint issue in the thread discussion.


    The HP customer complaint issue has been discussed in few threads on the TMC. Repeating the complaint with no restraints on the forum, especially if it is interjected into TMC prime real estate, where race car drivers talk about their car experiences, devalues the forum experience for me.


    It is not my place to say what might be a reasonable limit for rehashing the Tesla Motors related complaint on the TMC forum but I am pretty sure that 'infinite' is not a reasonable limit for repeating the same argument to the same audience. It is especially unfortunate when the repetitive complaining rains on a happy TMC member parade. At some point, it may be more constructive and to everyone's benefit to move the issue where it belongs, to Tesla Motors.


    There are other instances of posters repeating the same argument over and over, eroding the forum value for others. It might be helpful to have a 'Dog with a bone' thread or 'Dead horse' thread to deal with these polite but repetitive arguments. Or some other creative way of imposing a reasonable limit on unreasonable repetition.


    This is my individual feedback on the TMC experience. Others may agree or disagree.
     
  2. Ugliest1

    Ugliest1 S85: "Sparky"

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2013
    Messages:
    889
    Location:
    Victoria BC Canada
    1) I agree
    2) No clue how to do it - I.e., how can a mod police cross-thread shenanigans like that, and still have a life?
    3) Moderators do a great job! Thank you all mods! (Just taking the opportunity to add thanks - OP was not criticizing mods)
    4) I vote for "Flogging a Dead Horse" as the title
    5) thanks for bringing it up Auzie
     
  3. WarpedOne

    WarpedOne Supreme Premier

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,651
    Location:
    Slovenia, Europe
  4. Auzie

    Auzie Tree Hugger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,903
    Location:
    Sydney
    #4 Auzie, Oct 3, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2015
    Absolutely correct, thanks for pointing that out. My post is in no way directed at moderators, it is directed at repetitive posters who keep repeating the same argument over and over in multiple threads.

    How to deal with it - great question. This thread is my way of dealing with it, for a lack of a better way. Perhaps others might have some better ideas.
     
  5. Phil K

    Phil K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    256
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Thank you and agree with you.
     
  6. dsm363

    dsm363 Roadster + Sig Model S

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    18,235
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    It's actually +550.
     
  7. svp6

    svp6 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    297
    Location:
    MN
    Unless you upgrade the fuse and battery, then its +691. We should all write a letter complaining of the deceiving WarpedOne +691 post.
     
  8. WarpedOne

    WarpedOne Supreme Premier

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,651
    Location:
    Slovenia, Europe
    It is +691 but only for short amount of time.
    Too short for old mechanical dynos to register and too short to show through averaging algorithm in the car.
     
  9. AnOutsider

    AnOutsider S532 # XS27

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    11,923
    Well, to answer how to deal with it. In that specific instance I (as the poster) would have posted in one of the threads discussing the disappointment that according to *thread XYZ* it looks like it doesn't live up etc etc.

    As a moderator, depending on how entrenched the convo became, I would move that post out to one of the original threads discussing the topic with a signpost in both locations.

    As a non-moderator member, I'd suggest reporting the post as soon as you can so that if there IS an action to be taken, we can take it before things spiral too far out of control.
     
  10. Andyw2100

    Andyw2100 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    5,387
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY
    Actually I was the poster, and I take issue with your categorization of my post.

    First of all, the P90D with Ludicrous is a different model than the P85D, which is the one that we've been discussing with respect to the missing horsepower. Also, the discussion in that thread was already heading in the direction of "what the heck is going on with this?" I just summarized two recent posts, and wanted to make sure that it was clear that I and others understood what was being said and what that meant.

    What you didn't bother to say in your indictment of my post, and your description of how I derailed the thread is that in the ensuing conversation I was one of the people arguing on the Tesla side of things, suggesting that we give Tesla the benefit of the doubt for a while.

    This was a post I made in that thread on Friday, 10-2 (bold added):

    And this was one I made on Saturday, 10-3 (bold added):


    You may well have a valid issue to discuss concerning people posting about their pet issues in various threads, but you chose a poor example to use to illustrate your point. I was connecting a known issue with one model to a completely different model, for the first time, and was just summarizing what others were already saying. The thread was heading in the direction it went with or without me, and I wound up arguing on basically the pro-Tesla side.

    I'd suggest finding a better example if you want to win people over to your way of thinking.
     
  11. Auzie

    Auzie Tree Hugger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,903
    Location:
    Sydney
    #11 Auzie, Oct 3, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2015
    Andy


    I am not trying to win anyone over with my post, this one or any other post. I am stating my own personal feedback on the forum experience.


    I did not take issue with your support or the lack of support for Tesla, that is irrelevant to my post. I strongly disagree with a view that people taking a different position on a particular topic do so in order to support or not support Tesla. My forum experience is that most members speak their minds from very informed positions regardless of how it affects Tesla.


    This thread is about repeating the same arguments and complaining without restraints.


    My issue is that you keep repeating things like 'missing power', 'not meeting specs', even in your post here, and I take issue with that. Many members extremely knowledgeable on the subject have repeatedly disputed such claims on the forum. I prefer not to discuss the merits of these claims in this thread, it has been discussed elsewhere.


    I am really really really sorry that you feel wronged by Tesla. It is safe to assume that most forum members are sorry about that too. My view is that Tesla did fail you and other customers by failing to provide sufficient product information in a more proactive way. Customers need to make informed purchase decisions or they might feel wronged. Trying to catch up once people form their opinions and (mis)understandings is a losing battle for all. I also think that they did what they did because they are learning as they go.


    It is almost certain that Tesla itself would do many things differently with hindsight if only they could. It is certain to me that you gave Tesla a lesson about their (non) communication that they will not forget and that lesson will set a better stage for future customers. I bet that many Tesla employees lost a lot of sleep because of having customers that feel the way you do. I also feel that at some point it becomes destructive to keep repeating the same negative sentiment over and over to the same audience.


    Repeating negative statements with no restraint affects some other forum members, myself included. It sets the forum tone to what it is now. It rains on other people's parade.


    Repeating these statements frequently in many threads on the forum comes across to me as an attempt to use the TMC forum as the publicity leverage against Tesla. That is my impression and, of course, I could easily be wrong, only you know why you keep repeating it here.


    If you feel wronged, and you made it clear that you do, one option could be to move on in a way that works for you rather than keep repeating your arguments here. Another option is to do whatever you wish. Whatever you do I hope it works for you.
     
  12. Andyw2100

    Andyw2100 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    5,387
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY
    You seem to have entirely missed my point, which was that I was NOT repeating the same argument, for two main reasons. One was that this was a different car, and this was the first time people were beginning to reach the conclusions about this model that had already been reached about the P85D. The other is that I WAS ARGUING ON THE TESLA SIDE! How is that repeating the same argument? I feel that in light of how vocal I have been about the P85D issue, I should make my feelings known when I wish to be supportive of Tesla too. It's only fair.
     
  13. Krugerrand

    Krugerrand Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    4,252
    Location:
    California
    She said: I did not take issue with your support or the lack of support for Tesla, that is irrelevant to my post.

    And: My issue is that you keep repeating things like 'missing power', 'not meeting specs', even in your post here, and I take issue with that.

    I believe both of those statements clarify her issues and that you are the one missing her point, not the other way around.
     
  14. Andyw2100

    Andyw2100 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    5,387
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY
    Then you are mistaken.

    Those statements clarify nothing, and do nothing to invalidate my response or indicate that I misunderstood her.

    Her next line after the paragraph including the first one you quoted, was, "This thread is about repeating the same arguments and complaining without restraints." Here it is, in context, along with her other quote you chose to use:

    "Repeating the same arguments." What part of the fact that the P90D is a different car, so the argument can't be the same, are you not understanding?

    How is it that you are having difficulty comprehending that if someone normally argues against Tesla, that when they are arguing in favor Tesla that is not "repeating the same arguments?"

    The thing is, I don't think you are having any difficulty with any of this. I think you just like to stir things up, and whenever it is at all possible, you will take any and every opportunity to attempt to denigrate forum members who have ever taken what you consider to be an anti-Tesla view. Frankly, I'm getting sick of it.

    And yes, mods, I understand that the tone of this post may be a little less than collegial. I am trying to be careful not to cross any lines, but this poster has a history of doing this, and I feel the need to be able to express my displeasure. I believe I am doing it politely.

    Continuing on, Krugerrand, you used Aussie's quote about my "repeating things like missing power...even in your post here." I made no attempt to bring up the issue in this thread, as is crystal clear to anyone reading this thread. I was describing the issue that was being discussed. How would you have me refer to the issue? The way I referred to is is the way pretty much everyone on TMC refers to it. Would you prefer that it become the issue that can't be named, like Voldemort in "Harry Potter?" I made absolutely no effort to discuss the issue itself in this thread.

    Aussie, on the other hand, did the following, which I let pass, without comment, until now. She wrote:

    She wrote that she didn't want to discuss the merits, but then went on to immediately start discussing them. I chose not to mention that, and not to discuss the issue at all, because I was attempting to allow this thread to stay on topic, even though the OP herself was taking it off topic.

    I have repeatedly attempted to take the high road, but I'm also not going to sit back and allow things to be said about me that are not true.



     
  15. Krugerrand

    Krugerrand Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    4,252
    Location:
    California
    I don't think I am. I think you're talking past her because you're upset she referenced your post specifically. I believe this is when we agree to disagree.
     
  16. Andyw2100

    Andyw2100 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    5,387
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY
    I don't see how I am talking past her.

    I understand what you said about her saying she doesn't care which side I take, and that that is irrelevant. My point is that it is not irrelevant since her next point was that she called out my post because of repetitive posting, and the fact that I was arguing on the opposite side from what she would consider the repetitive side means by definition my post was not repetitive. The arguments themselves may not be relevant to Aussie, but the fact that the arguments are on opposite sides is relevant to my point that they are not repetitive.
     
  17. Krugerrand

    Krugerrand Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    4,252
    Location:
    California
    One can be repetitive in content (Auzie's point) regardless of which side one is arguing for or against.
     
  18. Eclectic

    Eclectic Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    293
    Location:
    San Francisco area
    What ever happened to just reading past things that you don't want to respond to? A forum is going to have messy channels of communication. Read and respond to that which you are interested in, ignore that which you find annoying, off topic, distracting, etc. It works magnificently.
     
  19. Andyw2100

    Andyw2100 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    5,387
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY
    But that wasn't her point.

    She wrote: "My issue is that you keep repeating things like 'missing power', 'not meeting specs', even in your post here, and I take issue with that. Many members extremely knowledgeable on the subject have repeatedly disputed such claims on the forum. I prefer not to discuss the merits of these claims in this thread, it has been discussed elsewhere. "

    Clearly she was saying that I kept arguing one side of it, and it was that she was taking issue with--the repetitiveness of that. If it was both sides of the same issue she was arguing against, she would not have followed up with the point about "Many members extremely knowledgeable on the subject have repeatedly disputed such claims on the forum."
     

Share This Page