Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Review: Hankook iON evo AS vs Pirelli AS+ Elect vs Michelin PS 4S vs Michelin PS AS 4

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I tested all these tires back to back on either a Tesla Model 3 or Y. I have both a Model 3 and a Model Y (wife’s).

My goal was to have a great handling tire (makes me happy) that can handle the occasional snow, is quiet, and has good range.

For context, I have the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires on both the 3 and Y. This is by far the best handling tire, really amazing, our benchmark for handling, and is just a joy to drive. I’m in Colorado though and for nov/dec/apr, we can see temps below 40, which is a no-no for driving the PS4S, so I wanted something more cold tolerant during the shoulder seasons. We have winter wheels (Pirelli Sottozero 3, which we love) for ski season.

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4:
I drove this on a Performance Model Y (Tesla test drive). Handling is very good, and I hear it’s also very good in the snow. Negatives is that it’s loud and it’s not great for range, the former being more important to me.

Pirelli All Season Plus Elect:
We bought these for our Model Y. Handling is good if not great. And it’s quiet and comfortable, and of course it’s tuned for EVs and has good range. We really really like these tires. I would give the edge to the PS AS 4 for handling, but it is slight and totally not enough to justify the range hit or how loud they are.

Hankook iON evo AS ih01:
I just bought these for my 3. It was a gamble because I couldn’t find any reviews on them. They are brand new to the market. Overall, I definitively do not like them. The handling is terrible for a car like the model 3 w/ AB. It feels super floaty and squirrelly when cornering. The noise level is not great either surprisingly. Strangely enough, it’s relatively louder at slower speeds, but does seem to be quiet on the highway. The Pirelli’s have way better handling and seem quieter all around. Aside from noise and handling, there is one thing the evos does really well. It feels like a bat out if hell when accelerating in a straight line. You can tell the engineering is optimized for that trait. I do like that a lot, and I’m sure it has great range, and I would accept the noise level too, but the handling is just too awful, I can’t accept it. That said, if you’re not a spirited driver, I think the evos are a great value. They’re just not for me.

Overall, I think the Pirelli AS PE hit all the cords I’m looking for. The Michelin PS AS 4’s are a close second and might also be better in snow, but we’re not optimizing for snow since we have winter tires. And the quiet ride and good range is also very much appreciated.

I hope this review helps others out there!

All these new EV tires are very exciting. I’m a huge Michelin fan, but they need to up their game on EV tires. For now, Pirelli is winning my business.

The_tire_wheel_of_TESLA_MODEL_3.jpg

"File:The tire wheel of TESLA MODEL 3.jpg" by Tokumeigakarinoaoshima is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Admin note: Image added for Blog Feed thumbnail
 
Just curious, why is the WH/Mile for say the MXM4 (OEM M3 tires) LOWER, so more efficient, and yet the “efficiency” seems to indicate higher for the HK ION Eve? I would say, my experience with the MXM4 is ~ 240 wH/Mile overall, some lower, some higher… i figured the HK would be better.

I haven't looked at it in a long time and forget the details, so don't quote me here, but I believe there are no actual energy metrics in the Tesla API so services like TeslaFi just make assumptions that don't really match reality. The efficiency number should be directly comparable regardless though because it's purely miles driven / rated miles consumed. I was kinda curious to refresh my memory on how/why TeslaFi presents the consumption but was feeling lazy knowing that for some reason I knew it was wrong. May have to go look :)
 
The old cars aren’t traction limited in a straight line. These tires won’t slow the old car down in a straight line because of traction. However, they are heavier so that can cost you .01-.03 seconds on a 1/4 mile.

The new Model 3 Performance can be traction limited with an optimized battery and motors. I did my best 0-60 mph ever with Hankook iON EVO AS tires but it was fighting traction for that particular run.

View attachment 1060363

Ya, I don't have any evidence to dispute you, just a feeling that there's more tire scrubbing with these on 0-60 pulls on my everyday streets. May not have any impact even if my perception is real (which I really think it is, lol).
 
  • Like
Reactions: mpgxsvcd
The results were really interesting as they highlight how big of a difference on efficiency tires can make.

Here are the results:

  1. Hankook iON evo AS: 263 Wh/mile
  2. Goodyear EcoReady: 269 Wh/mile
  3. Continental ProContact RX (T1): 272 Wh/mile
  4. Goodyear ElectricDrive 2: 274 Wh/mile
  5. Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S: 274 Wh/mile
  6. Pirelli P Zero (PZ4): 274 Wh/mile
  7. Bridgestone Turanza EV: 276 Wh/mile
  8. Michelin Pilot Sports 4S: 290 Wh/mile
  9. Michelin Pilot Sports All Season 4: 292 Wh/mile
View attachment 1060165
Keep in mind the fine print here as well - some of the tires they tested were 18" instead of 19", so the GoodYear EcoReady would likely be higher.

Pretty lame that they went ahead and included that tire in the same chart, IMO.

Still, highlights how good the iON evo AS is and how much less efficient the Michelin Pilot tires are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrChaos
This won't be a popular opinion on a tire efficiency thread, but IMO the whole tire efficiency thing is overblown. Unless you live somewhere with expensive power, the difference between 250wh/mi and 300wh/mi might not be enough to justify paying $200 or more for a more efficient tire. Now if you live somewhere with expensive power OR expect to get more than 35k miles out of an EV tire, the numbers may work out in your favor:

1719596355560.png




In my case, I was able to get a set Goodyear ElectricDrive tires installed for $875 at Discount Tire during their Memorial Day sale. The Pirelli Elects were $200 more and the ION EVOs were $350 more. Compared to the worn MXM4s I replaced, the Goodyears consume 10-15% more energy but they handle a lot better and were significantly cheaper than the alternative EV tires offered at the time.
 
This won't be a popular opinion on a tire efficiency thread, but IMO the whole tire efficiency thing is overblown. Unless you live somewhere with expensive power, the difference between 250wh/mi and 300wh/mi might not be enough to justify paying $200 or more for a more efficient tire. Now if you live somewhere with expensive power OR expect to get more than 35k miles out of an EV tire, the numbers may work out in your favor:

View attachment 1060585



In my case, I was able to get a set Goodyear ElectricDrive tires installed for $875 at Discount Tire during their Memorial Day sale. The Pirelli Elects were $200 more and the ION EVOs were $350 more. Compared to the worn MXM4s I replaced, the Goodyears consume 10-15% more energy but they handle a lot better and were significantly cheaper than the alternative EV tires offered at the time.
For me, it's not about the money - it's about providing more flexibility on road trips, which can be priceless.