Some difficult reading
(what on earth is a single Challenger 2 doing in Robotdyne area, they are apparently all up north so seeing one down south in a solo manner is most odd)
Russian defences and military adaptations pose challenges for Ukraine's 2023 offensive.
rusi.org
On June 4, Ukraine launched its long-awaited offensive. The operation has proven to be a test of Ukrainian determination and adaptation. Despite stiff
warontherocks.com
Hard to say what those tanks were. There were two tanks that didn't look Russian, that's about all I can say about it. One looked like it was in pretty bad shape, on fire, but the other one only looked disabled, if it wasn't just stopped on the road for some other reason (like the crew was taking a break).
There was one at least one other Challenger destroyed in Iraq from friendly fire.
Western armies haven't faced a near peer adversary in a very long time. Parts of the air war in Korea had USAF Sabre pilots dueling with Russians, but most of the wars western armies have fought in the last 80 years have been against opponents who might be able to carry out an insurgency and bleed the invader to a point of retreat, but in a straight up fight, the enemy was always over matched.
At least one Challenger and some Abrams were lost to friendly fire because the enemy didn't really have much anti-tank capability that was up to the fight. The US sliced through a field of T-55s and T-72s in the first Gulf War. It was a lopsided fight, the Iraqis lost 186 tanks and I don't think they hit a single US tank. All the US losses were due to friendly fire.
Ukraine is the better army, but this is the closest to a near peer fight with the active service NATO weaponry since NATO was founded. Russia has the ability to knock out western supplied vehicles and they have been doing so.
We don't know how that tank was knocked out. It could have been artillery, running over an anti-tank mine that went off under a critical area, an ATGM, or something else.
The lack of news from some of the front for the last 3 days is quite interesting. In fact this is the most interesting thing I've seen in a while, Ukraine preparing to exploit openings?
@petit_bateau I think you have to take every posts from Noel with a bit of a grain of salt. He's often posted just wrong info. Is that a challenger? No idea, was it in the south, no idea. He posted about some trenchline a day or two ago and the picture was the wrong province and from spring.
Re tanks: Of course it could mean they moved the tank company with Challengers to the south.
The Ukrainian government is pretty good on getting people to shut up when they are about to make a big move.
New artillery loss record for russia
That's isn't an all time high. The Ukrainians claimed 44 on June 23, but that is one of the biggest hauls.
Tracking Russia's losses in Ukraine
Push Russia to gun exhaustion and that will put them in a very difficult position. Their artillery arm has been the most effective in this war.
I didn't realise the original source was Noel re the Challenger. But you are right, they may have relocated all of them. I guess it will become apparent in due course.
This article is pretty comprehensive and very fair I thought. Thus far Russia has been able to hit the reset button in geographic terms. It remains to be seen whether the cumulative losses will allow Ukraine to push beyond that critical reset rate. There has been a pause&resupply/consolidate/try-again cycle thus far and the news flow of any advances has typically come out in the pause/resupply phase so news has tended to be about a half-cycle behind progress. At least that has been my impression.
Perseverance and Adaptation: Ukraine’s Counteroffensive at Three Months - War on the Rocks
One of the interesting things about that recent Ka52 loss was that it was over the Azov Sea. Almost as if there is rotation going on from the Russian shore to forward bases for deployment cycles. As if the Russians were doing crew rest and maintenance cycles on the east shore now, rather than the west shore. If so that reduces the effective force that can be operating at any one time.
The Ka52 fleet is also probably facing a lot of maintenance challenges at this point. There is evidence the Russians have been stripping some airframes to keep others flying. Rotor blades are particularly hard to come by. There have been pictures of Ka52 with the rotors removed.
I don't know if the Ka52 that went down over the Azov was eastbound or westbound. If eastbound it may have been sent to the rear because it was showing signs of battle fatigue and needed some repairs, and the fatigue led to failure over the sea. If westbound it could have been due to faulty repairs.