Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Russia/Ukraine conflict

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Given the Kakhovka Dam breach, have to wonder if Ukarine could decrease outflows further upstream on the Dnipro River, further lowering water levels from Zaporizhzhia down to the Black Sea.

By early summer, formerly underwater land should be dry enough for heavy equipment mobilization and the remaining river should be much easier to ford at numerous locations, thus providing a new counteroffensive axis.

Russia has spent much less effort fortifying that stretch of the river.
 
Been reading the KA-52 has been highly effective so far in holding back the Ukrainian offensive, so much more of this needs to happen, maybe even ideally destroying them at base.
And the bases are within reach of the storm shadow and yet they don’t use them for this. That tells us something…..we’ll it could tell us many things.
 
Given the Kakhovka Dam breach, have to wonder if Ukarine could decrease outflows further upstream on the Dnipro River, further lowering water levels from Zaporizhzhia down to the Black Sea.

By early summer, formerly underwater land should be dry enough for heavy equipment mobilization and the remaining river should be much easier to ford at numerous locations, thus providing a new counteroffensive axis.

Russia has spent much less effort fortifying that stretch of the river.

Early summer might just be around the corner...

If the dam breach was indeed deliberate with the intention of reducing the length of the front line, this could soon turn out as a classic example of shooting themselves into the foot.

Edit to add: Ukraine controls the dam upstream at Zaporizhia.
 
Last edited:
And the bases are within reach of the storm shadow and yet they don’t use them for this. That tells us something…..we’ll it could tell us many things.

There are reports that Ukraine used drones to knock out a Russia drone airbase near Svatove in Luhansk.


This is in the northern region of the front while most of the recent fighting has been reported further south in Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia. Interesting ...
 
Been reading the KA-52 has been highly effective so far in holding back the Ukrainian offensive, so much more of this needs to happen, maybe even ideally destroying them at base.
Apparently approx 30 x Ka52 have been destroyed this far, which is about a third of the Russian fleet.

One has to wonder what the crew situation is.

I'm sure Ukraine would be targetting the bases if it could identify them timeously.

==========

EDIT
More reports regarding these latest moves. There was also some reporting (in Ukraine, but translated) that indicated infantry casulaties of 50 Russian KIA and 70 WIA for loss of 1 and 1 in Ukraine's force. The disparity was huge.

 
Last edited:
Given the Kakhovka Dam breach, have to wonder if Ukarine could decrease outflows further upstream on the Dnipro River, further lowering water levels from Zaporizhzhia down to the Black Sea.

By early summer, formerly underwater land should be dry enough for heavy equipment mobilization and the remaining river should be much easier to ford at numerous locations, thus providing a new counteroffensive axis.

Russia has spent much less effort fortifying that stretch of the river.

Though by the time the mud has dried out enough the Russians could fortify that sector. Anyone crossing that stretch also has to do so with no cover. The Ukrainians can do it at night, but movement during the day would be tough.

And the bases are within reach of the storm shadow and yet they don’t use them for this. That tells us something…..we’ll it could tell us many things.

The Ukrainians would have to identify the exact locations of the helicopters under cover and dispersed, then allocate one Storm Shadow per helicopter. It would burn up a lot of Storm Shadows and might waste some because those helicopters are moving around a lot unless they are down for maintenance.

Early summer might just be around the corner...

If the dam breach was indeed deliberate with the intention of reducing the length of the front line, this could soon turn out as a classic example of shooting themselves into the foot.

Edit to add: Ukraine controls the dam upstream at Zaporizhia.

Russia is good at the nasty tricks department, but like an amateur chess player, they don't think through the long term consequences of their moves. The flooding affected their troops on the left bank more than it affected the Ukrainians and while the Ukrainians in the flooded areas are taking the precautions of boiling their water, the Russians are getting cholera in their occupied region. The Russians are known to be very poor with sanitation, so it's likely that they are going to struggle to get the cholera under control.

Apparently approx 30 x Ka52 have been destroyed this far, which is about a third of the Russian fleet.

One has to wonder what the crew situation is.

I'm sure Ukraine would be targetting the bases if it could identify them timeously.

According to the Wikipedia list of aircraft losses, 26 Ka-52 have been lost and 5 damaged. These appear to be visually confirmed losses
List of aircraft losses during the Russo-Ukrainian War - Wikipedia

Actual losses are almost certainly higher. They started the war with 133. Between combat losses and numbers being diminished due to wear and tear leading to long repair cycles, Russia could have lost 50-100 thus far. Though the pilots of the helicopters down for maintenance would be free to be moved to another helicopter.

==========

EDIT
More reports regarding these latest moves. There was also some reporting (in Ukraine, but translated) that indicated infantry casulaties of 50 Russian KIA and 70 WIA for loss of 1 and 1 in Ukraine's force. The disparity was huge.


I've been reading that rather than sit and wait in defensive positions, the Russians have been trying to counterattack all along the front which results in very high losses. They are bleeding out their own defense force in front of their trenchlines.

Igor Girkin who has been pretty accurate about predictions of the Russian military thus far, said yesterday that once the Ukrainians breach the line of defense they are attacking now, Russia will have few troops left to stop them and the Russian military will collapse. He also predicts this will trigger a political collapse in Russia.

For Girkin this isn't a good thing. He and Prigozhin are the only two prominent Russians who are realists about the Russian military. Both want to see Russia succeed, but they see where Russia is failing and are predicting overall failure as a result.
 
There are reports that Ukraine used drones to knock out a Russia drone airbase near Svatove in Luhansk.


This is in the northern region of the front while most of the recent fighting has been reported further south in Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia. Interesting ...
Defmon and I and many others keep waiting for that northern front to open up.
 
Excuse me, is there a good reason why Israel should be willing to sell all these Merkavas all of a sudden? So far Israel seemed to be happy to keep a low profile in this conflict. So what happened to change that position? Most likely not the rather small sum that they are receiving in exchange for these old Merkavas.
Was there some backroom deal with Netanyahu, that he wouldn't be bothered if Israel expanded even more into the occupied territories? He has to satisfy his ultra-right wing coalition partners, after all. Not that the West really cares about all that high minded rhetoric that we are getting served with regard to Crimea, whenever it comes to Israel and the occupied territories.
Perhaps this is just a conspiracy theory, yet we had always an abundance of such stuff surface after wars.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SPadival
Another point: we are again being told that negotiations with Russia won't happen as long as Putin is in power and those occupied territories haven't been returned. Ukraine is welcome to have this position, yet that doesn't mean that everyone else is obliged to share it.
There is also this argument being made, that there would be further invasions in the future, unless Putin gets toppled and Russia defeated. We heard such arguments about an inevitable war with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and they weren't any better then than they are now.
 
@wdolson Ideally they'd hit the aircraft support crew sleeping quarters or maint sheds, etc. Or the pilots housing. They are dispersing the helicopters but the support stuff...not likely they have 25 parts rooms.

EDITED- I see @petit_bateau thought the same. Makes me feel good.

The Ukrainians are good at hitting support services when they can find them. They may not have found where the support facilities are yet. The Russian air force does appear to be fairly competent at hiding their footprint on forward deployment air bases. Almost all the attacks on aviation have been on permanent facilities where it's harder to hide the barracks and the repair facilities.

The army on the other hand appears to be pretty inept at hiding their headquarters.

Defmon and I and many others keep waiting for that northern front to open up.

Ukraine may be more interested in the southern front because they want to liberate the nuclear plant before anything really bad happens.

Excuse me, is there a good reason why Israel should be willing to sell all these Merkavas all of a sudden? So far Israel seemed to be happy to keep a low profile in this conflict. So what happened to change that position? Most likely not the rather small sum that they are receiving in exchange for these old Merkavas.
Was there some backroom deal with Netanyahu, that he wouldn't be bothered if Israel expanded even more into the occupied territories? He has to satisfy his ultra-right wing coalition partners, after all. Not that the West really cares about all that high minded rhetoric that we are getting served with regard to Crimea, whenever it comes to Israel and the occupied territories.
Perhaps this is just a conspiracy theory, yet we had always an abundance of such stuff surface after wars.

I doubt that anyone is giving Netanyahu permission to expand settlements. However, there could be many deals made to encourage Israel. The Biden administration has been doing significant backroom dealing during the war. The US may have offered Israel a deep discount on F-35s or something like that in exchange for freeing up some of their armor reserve. Somebody else may have offered up a good deal in exchange for Merkavas.

We may never know the details, but watch for arms purchases by Israel in the next year or two.
 
Another point: we are again being told that negotiations with Russia won't happen as long as Putin is in power and those occupied territories haven't been returned. Ukraine is welcome to have this position, yet that doesn't mean that everyone else is obliged to share it.
There is also this argument being made, that there would be further invasions in the future, unless Putin gets toppled and Russia defeated. We heard such arguments about an inevitable war with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and they weren't any better then than they are now.
Ukraine says they won't negotiate with Putin, but they did not explicitly say they will only negotiate only if he is out of power, nor did they say they are not willing to negotiate with a different Russian representative.
Ukraine sees no way to negotiate peace with Putin after war crimes warrant
As a concrete example, negotiations of the Black Sea grain deal continued even well after Ukraine made the above statements.
What is the Ukraine grain deal?
Their baseline terms for negotiation however is return of their territories, that bit is clear.

However, you have only focused on the victim's terms as if they are the ones being unreasonable. Russia's terms is lifting of all sanctions/war crime trials and international recognition of occupied territories as Russian.

As for preventing further invasions in the future, what is required is Russia not gaining anything from this war. I don't think any on the opposing side is hopeful that necessarily Putin will be toppled or Russia's government necessarily to change much even if Putin was toppled. Negotiations where there is a temporary ceasefire and Russia still holding on to annexed territory have already been shown to be a completely failed strategy that will not lead to long term peace. Not sure why people think it would be any different if we tried the same thing.
 
Given the Kakhovka Dam breach, have to wonder if Ukarine could decrease outflows further upstream on the Dnipro River, further lowering water levels from Zaporizhzhia down to the Black Sea.

By early summer, formerly underwater land should be dry enough for heavy equipment mobilization and the remaining river should be much easier to ford at numerous locations, thus providing a new counteroffensive axis.

Russia has spent much less effort fortifying that stretch of the river.

On the related topic of 'who dunnit?' here are results of the investigation by the NY Times:

Why the Evidence Suggests Russia Blew Up the Kakhovka Dam | nytimes.com (2 days ago)

Evidence suggests Russia blew Kakhovka dam in Ukraine: NYT | REUTERS (16 hrs ago)
 
Denys reports on attacks on Russian supply depots all across the Russian controlled areas, including a large rail station in Kherson destroyed. He talked at length about the K52s being downed. And that Russia used at least one T55 tank loaded with explosives to try to blow a literal hole in the Ukrainian lines but it hit a mine and exploded before it got there.

 
Last edited:
The Ukrainians would have to identify the exact locations of the helicopters under cover and dispersed, then allocate one Storm Shadow per helicopter. It would burn up a lot of Storm Shadows and might waste some because those helicopters are moving around a lot unless they are down for maintenance.



According to the Wikipedia list of aircraft losses, 26 Ka-52 have been lost and 5 damaged. These appear to be visually confirmed losses
List of aircraft losses during the Russo-Ukrainian War - Wikipedia

Actual losses are almost certainly higher. They started the war with 133. Between combat losses and numbers being diminished due to wear and tear leading to long repair cycles, Russia could have lost 50-100 thus far. Though the pilots of the helicopters down for maintenance would be free to be moved to another helicopter.
There are 35 losses of Ka52 in the Oryx list, so the actual will likely be higher. Crew training cycle will likely be quite long, and morale amongst that cadre must be somewhat brittle by now. The more that are removed from the equation whilst protecting these static forward positions, the fewer will be available during the manoeuvre phase.

It seems likely to me that the Russians would be basing the Ka52 mostly in territory that is not accessible to Storm Shadow (ie original Russian territory east of Azov Sea, where the political agreement with UK is to not use these weapons) and then forward deploying for minimum time on ground in occupied territory, with those sites relocating frequently. I am sure the UKR side is trying to identify ways at them.


Overall it seems to me the UKR are doing an excellent job of picking apart the Russian lines in a cost-effective manner, with the fewest possible UKR troops lost whilst making progress in sufficient widespread locations that Russia cannot risk deploying its reserves to reinforce only one sector.