ℬête Noire
Active Member
Perhaps, but I'm expecting it to be a great handling car because of its center of gravity.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps, but I'm expecting it to be a great handling car because of its center of gravity.
Define "tons of money". After spending billions on preparing for production it might not be a bad idea to spend a few more bucks on the "final smackdown" We shall find out in a couple of months.Why spend tons of time and money to barely come within sight of the M3's handling when they can tweak the motor parameters and beat the M3 in acceleration, for instance?
It also has a very well made electronic differential that manages torque between inside and outside wheels on acceleration and deceleration in corners.
A good aftermarket LSD will definitely help, but I don't think a mechanical LSD works as well as an electronic actuated multi clutch differential.
Don't think brake based system will last the time on a track unless it's carbon ceramic brakes.
Almost certainly the 2020 Roadster will in the rear at least, considering what they claim it'll do.I do think Tesla could eventually build a car with separate motors for left and right and simulate differential that way.
And I love the generous use of alcantara throughout the interior. This is class!Here's a nice EV. And seats positioned towards the center of the cabin, since AP(automobile pilot) takes care of the driving.
Similar to concepts 100 years later
Top view of electric car interior. Front seats turned around..
I do think Tesla could eventually build a car with separate motors for left and right and simulate differential that way.
Almost certainly the 2020 Roadster will in the rear at least, considering what they claim it'll do.
That strikes me as quite hopeful thinking. That represents a LOT of engineering work to put into the P.In fact they may be using the Performance Model 3 as a early test bed for getting three "smaller" motors working in one vehicle before going all out on the Roadster.
That strikes me as quite hopeful thinking. That represents a LOT of engineering work to put into the P.
Surely carbon ceramic is given if they are "serious" but even then 1st principles are unfriendly to the approach.
/QUOTE]
Agreed in general, but I do believe some of the modern days McLaren cars use open diff with brakes to simulate LSD. So it must make some sense if they are using it.
So next time someone sees a Model 3 test car at the tracker gets some pictures of under the rear as well! (Though it would probably all be concealed by aero panels.)
Define "tons of money". After spending billions on preparing for production it might not be a bad idea to spend a few more bucks on the "final smackdown"
It doesn't need to out handle an M3 but I don't think I'm going to get one if it's just a power and tire upgrade like the Model S/X performance versions. Plenty of people want a real performance version. Another reason to do it is to get better reviews from automotive journalists who in general love performance models.A different but more applicable question is: Why does the model 3P need to outhandle the BMW M3? Beside the fact that Tesla doesn't have the technical capability to do so (as noted earlier), beside the fact that they don't have the resources to do so (there's plenty of actual problems at Tesla for engineering teams to tackle...), there's zero demand for them to do so. Nobody who is buying a model 3P needs it to outhandle the BMW.
It doesn't need to out handle an M3 but I don't think I'm going to get one if it's just a power and tire upgrade like the Model S/X performance versions. Plenty of people want a real performance version. Another reason to do it is to get better reviews from automotive journalists who in general love performance models.
Tesla doesn't need the small potential additional press or demand that such a vehicle would create. Small return for large effort. They might do it anyway but there is no rational reason for them to do so.It doesn't need to out handle an M3 but I don't think I'm going to get one if it's just a power and tire upgrade like the Model S/X performance versions. Plenty of people want a real performance version. Another reason to do it is to get better reviews from automotive journalists who in general love performance models.
T
So....how much effort do you think it will take, and how much better than the BMW do you think Tesla can make the Model 3P?
I autocross so I consider that real performance I would say that the for Model 3 the BMW 3 series is the benchmark. Therefore the performance version should be compared to the M3 or maybe the M-performance package depending on price. Competing with ICE vehicles for 100mph+ performance is probably not worth the compromises.The question is, what is considered real performance? Something comparable to a 3 series M-Performance package handling with good acceleration? Something similar to a Hellcat with good handling? Or something similar to a C63 or M3 with very good acceleration and performance? Also, is acceleration only 0-60, or should Tesla also look to improve 1/4 miles and high speed acceleration too? As fast as P100DL Model S is, it's not quite ready to compete against the M5, E63S, and others once we are looking at 100mph+ performance. On US street, that may not matter, but it's noticeable when comparison is done on big tracks or places like Autobahn.