Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Wiki Selling TSLA Options - Be the House

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
And if the stock goes to 700 and the strike improvement turns out to be abysmal for both, 450CC will still net you $10 per share more than 420CC + $20 spread.
Thats correct.

But what @BornToFly (and people like I) are looking for is "steady income", with growth potential. Otherwise we shouldn't sell CC - afterall if we don't sell CC and SP goes to $700, it will net $250 more than a $450CC !
 
  • Like
Reactions: BornToFly
Thats correct.

But what @BornToFly (and people like I) are looking for is "steady income", with growth potential. Otherwise we shouldn't sell CC - afterall if we don't sell CC and SP goes to $700, it will net $250 more than a $450CC !
I never said don't sell CC. Please reread everything I said. I said if you're going to sell CC and you're going spend $2 to manage your risks, there are no noticeable differences between -420C + 400/420 vs -450.
 
That 4 millions dollars in stock generating $200k a year. Is that the end goal?

Dumb lazy me would just put that it in an ETF like BST and get 5-10% dividend for year.
Well, $200k is 5% of $4M. But the hope is TSLA has better growth potential than BST. Afterall the whole discussion is around what happens if Tesla doubles in a year !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Holder
I never said don't sell CC. Please reread everything I said. I said if you're going to sell CC and you're going spend $2 to manage your risks, there are no noticeable differences between -420C + 400/420 vs -450.
You don't see any noticeable difference in the table I posted above ? BTW, the risk @BornToFly is trying to manage, is not getting income in 2025. You are thinking of other risks (like lower cap appreciation). Different objectives.
 
You don't see any noticeable difference in the table I posted above ? BTW, the risk @BornToFly is trying to manage, is not getting income in 2025. You are thinking of other risks (like lower cap appreciation). Different objectives.
No. I don't see much of a difference. Net net, -450C gets you +10 after 450 while -420 & 400/420 gets you +20 at 420 which diminishes as it goes further out from 420 down to $0 at 400/440. Between 440 and 450, the -450C begins to win more and more, up to +10 at 450. These are miniscule figures. And if it proves anything, it's that -450CC is better the higher the stock goes, which is the very same risk you're trying to mitigate.

How is selling 420CC and buy 400/420 going to solve "not getting income in 2025" more effectively than selling 450CC if the stock goes to 500?

At 500, you will have an $80 ITM CC and $30 in cash while I will have a $50 ITM CC with $10 in cash. You have $20 more than me so you've achieved your objective, right? As long as we're both rolling our CC, who care how deep you are vs how deep I am, right? A lot of people think like you, as long as they get their cash they're happy, despite having their ITM CCs in a much worse position.

But watch this: what if I roll that -450CC I have down to -420C at that point? Suddenly I'll also have an $80 ITM CC, same as you, and $40 in cash ($10 from before and $30 from rolling 450 down to 420)

So at that point, whatever you decide to do with your -420CC, I can also do with my -420CC, but I will have $10 more than you for every share I own.

The ultimate objective should be to grow your account. If I can grow my account $10 per share more than you, I win. This is not about income or cap appreciation. Income is only truly income when you get it as an extra. If you give up $30 in share value in exchange for $20 in cash, that's a losing trade, not income.
 
Last edited:
dl003 has made some very good points. Another thing I was debating is not doing both at the same time. I can open the Jan 2025 +400/-420 now while the SP is low and it is only $2. Then do my normal weeklies for 0.2 and hope the SP climbs slowly. Then sell 450CC for what I could sell a 420CC now. Best of both worlds. The nice thing about doing the spread at this point, is that if the SP doesn't climb much in the next 6 months, or goes down, the Bull call spread I bought will still be worth about $2. At worst, I lose $1 closing it in 6 months if it looks like the SP will never reach 420. But if I wait and the SP starts rising, the cost to open the spread will increase.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: LAexpress and EVNow
dl003 has made some very good points. Another thing I was debating is not doing both at the same time. I can open the Jan 2025 +400/-420 now while the SP is low and it is only $2. Then do my normal weeklies for 0.2 and hope the SP climbs slowly. Then sell 450CC for what I could sell a 420CC now. Best of both worlds. The nice thing about doing the spread at this point, is that if the SP doesn't climb much in the next 6 months, or goes down, the Bull call spread I bought will still be worth about $2. At worst, I lose $1 closing it in 6 months if it looks like the SP will never reach 420. But if I wait and the SP starts rising, the cost to open the spread will increase.
My view is that SP will go down before coming back up. I don’t know how market will react to Tesla not growing much next year.
 
My view is that SP will go down before coming back up. I don’t know how market will react to Tesla not growing much next year.

I think Tesla already told us on the Q3 call they expect lower growth next year so it shouldn't be a surprise?

Out of curiosity though I did a useless math thing-

Their Q3 2023 report shows installed production capacity at end of Q3 to be 2.35 million (and 3 of those numbers has a ># listing meaning capacity is higher than the number listed, though I ignored that to sum to the 2.35M)

Now as they note themselves in the graphic, installed capacity != current production rate due to downtime and other factors.

That said, out of curiosity, I looked back at the Q3 2022 installed capacity report.
It sums to 1.9M. The 1.8M Tesla expects to build in 2023 is 95% of the Q3 2022 installed capacity.
If we apply the same math to the Q3 2023 installed capacity we get 2,232,500 cars produced in 2024.
Which would be roughly 25-26% YoY growth if they hit the expected 1.8M this year.
 
dl003 has made some very good points. Another thing I was debating is not doing both at the same time. I can open the Jan 2025 +400/-420 now while the SP is low and it is only $2. Then do my normal weeklies for 0.2 and hope the SP climbs slowly. Then sell 450CC for what I could sell a 420CC now. Best of both worlds. The nice thing about doing the spread at this point, is that if the SP doesn't climb much in the next 6 months, or goes down, the Bull call spread I bought will still be worth about $2. At worst, I lose $1 closing it in 6 months if it looks like the SP will never reach 420. But if I wait and the SP starts rising, the cost to open the spread will increase.
Or you buy the long call now, while they're cheap and then use those as the long leg in weekly diagonal spreads, which is what I'm now doing
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BornToFly
They are cheap because structure wise we are in a super twilight zone. Theres no telling if 175 or 300 will be next. Once mr. market has shown his card, the flow will follow. Up or down, we'll see. I had no issue calling 180 at 300 last year, 160 at 217 this year, 250 at 153, etc... you get my point. I can't call anything at this moment. So tread carefully. What I can see is, the upside, of which probability is unknown, has more room for the stock to go than the downside. We're talking about at least a 2:1 ratio between upside : downside. Until I call for the 3rd big leg down, don't get shaken out.
 
Last edited:
QTA Levels for today

1700837257877.png


11/24

1700837282812.png


12/1

1700837309362.png


1700837332460.png