Yes. Order of magnitude better. Flawless at roundabouts which previously could not execute at all. Also can identify and slow down naturally for speed bumps. Just to give a couple examples. Check out Edgecase on X
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Wiki Selling TSLA Options - Be the House
- Thread starter adiggs
- Start date
i still don't understand why there is free money 7dte
buy SMCI stock 83,900, STO DITM CC 735 credit 12,500, cb 71,400
at 0dte 73,500-71,400=2,100 extrinsic net income, 2.5% ROIC one week
all signs pointing to SMCI 1000
i am going to take advantage before MM finds out, and then the jig is up
buy SMCI stock 83,900, STO DITM CC 735 credit 12,500, cb 71,400
at 0dte 73,500-71,400=2,100 extrinsic net income, 2.5% ROIC one week
all signs pointing to SMCI 1000
i am going to take advantage before MM finds out, and then the jig is up
next week is SMCI earnings
EW update:
In order to escape the red count, TSLA still needs to get above $178 and $207
In order to escape the red count, TSLA still needs to get above $178 and $207
The high IV is no joke. I've been doing CC on some puts assigned at the start of April, then a 20% drop out of nowhere, and a week later, the SP is almost back up. It feels like a complete crapshoot planning strike prices
Well look at that, SMCI is back over 840, the short leg of the 100 wide put spread that I had to close near 740. I didn't have the courage to wait out the storm. I also couldn't make sense of the drop against an otherwise decent looking read of vanna, gamma, and oi. From that standpoint, it didn't look like the drop should have occurred. Whether that near 250+ point drop and reversal in one week can still be considered a black swan or not, I have to learn to trust my instincts, wait out these high volatility cycles.
The signal is strong. Not only a gravestone doji but also super high down volume.Does this qualify or needs to be fully red and no wicks
View attachment 1041998
Edit: Well, so far we got a big red pointy thingy
View attachment 1042000
Still rejecting the 5-day, testing the 20-day:
View attachment 1042002
View attachment 1042001
What happen after that and is going to happen early - mid next week is exhaustion. The reason its not pulling back just yet is because SPY is not ready. Need 1 final push up before bears fully capitulate and the whole market goes down again.
It's entirely possible we'll see mid 150s by mid May before ~200 in June.
This is great. Thanks.
Is it safe to sell -C180 5/3 or 5/17 and/or buy +P160 around here or wait for next week $177-$178?
thenewguy1979
"The" Dog
Perhaps FOMC come out - no rate cut but rate hike - SPY and MACRO drop like a bomb - Market Correction??
Are you in for any Put Spread dl003?
No cut no hike. Market just needs to complete its pullback. Technical driven. I'm still in short SPY calls.
ProfessorZoom
Member
btw Rivians suck and they drive so bad !! (I've never driven one)
btw ford lightning drives like crap ! !(I've never driven it though)
Antman 3 was really bad too (I didn't see it though !)
thenewguy1979
"The" Dog
Right on time...
By Ryan Felton and Dean Seal
Federal auto-safety regulators have opened an investigation into the adequacy of Tesla's December recall of 2 million vehicles equipped with Autopilot software, tying the technology to at least 14 fatalities, several dozen injuries and hundreds of crashes.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a report published Friday that its examination of Tesla's Autopilot, a driver-assist system that automates some driving tasks, uncovered a trend of "avoidable crashes involving hazards that would have been visible to an attentive driver."
NHTSA, the auto industry's top regulator, shed more light on the safety concerns that have long swirled around Autopilot, providing new information on fatalities and injuries linked to drivers' use of the controversial feature, which is widely available on Tesla models.
The new probe also marks an escalation of NHTSA's long-running scrutiny of the technology, which it had been investigating for nearly three years after numerous high-profile crashes, including ones that killed drivers.
On Friday, the regulator said it was closing its earlier probe and opening the new one into the adequacy of the recall remedy, which was deployed through a software update. The recall in December was among Tesla's largest to date and involved nearly all the vehicles it had sold in the U.S.
In all, NHTSA said it had identified 467 crashes involving Autopilot.
The regulator said its Office of Defects Investigation had discovered crashes that occurred after the recall and results from preliminary tests the agency performed on remedied vehicles.
Tesla issued the recall to address a previous NHTSA investigation into whether the Autopilot program contained a defect that created an unreasonable risk to vehicle safety.
The resulting recall affected more than 2 million Model Y, X, S, 3 and Cybertruck vehicles made since 2012 that were equipped with Autopilot. In updating the vehicle software, Tesla said it had installed new safeguards to prevent driver misuse.
Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment.
NHTSA offered more details on Friday about the work that led to the recall, saying its effort "showed evidence that Tesla's weak driver engagement system was not appropriate for Autopilot's permissive operating capabilities."
This mismatch resulted in a "critical safety gap" between drivers' expectations of Autopilot's safety and the system's actual capabilities, it added.
NHTSA also compared Autopilot to similar systems deployed by auto-industry rivals, saying it found Tesla's approach was an "industry outlier." The agency said the Autopilot name "elicits the idea of drivers not being in control," while other systems use terms like "assist" or "team" to imply that active supervision is required.
In its latest report, NHTSA took issue with Tesla's statements that a portion of the recall remedy required opt-in from the owner and could be reversed at the driver's discretion. It also said some Tesla updates appeared to address Autopilot issues that the NHTSA raised without identifying them as remedies.
"This investigation will consider why these updates were not a part of the recall or otherwise determined to remedy a defect that poses an unreasonable safety risk," the agency said.
Since the Autopilot update was rolled out, regulators have received an unusually high number of complaints about changes made to the controls. Some drivers say warnings have become excessive and are triggered when performing routine tasks.
Tesla has been beset with safety setbacks recently. Earlier this year, Tesla issued a recall for nearly all of its electric vehicles sold in the U.S. due to the font for some visual warning lights being too small.
Several other government agencies have opened their own investigations into Tesla's Autopilot. The Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission, in particular, are examining whether Tesla misled customers and investors with marketing that overstated the technology's capabilities, giving drivers a false impression of what it can realistically do.
Multiple lawsuits over crashes in which Autopilot was engaged also are pending. This month, the electric-car maker reached a settlement with the family of a driver who died in a 2018 crash.
In that case, Walter Huang, a 38-year-old Apple engineer, died on Highway 101 in California after his Model X sport-utility vehicle crashed into a highway barrier while he was using Autopilot. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed.
(Write to Ryan Felton at [email protected] and Dean Seal at [email protected])
U.S. Regulators Tie Tesla's Autopilot to More than a Dozen Fatalities, Hundreds of Crashes — WSJ
Apr 26, 202413:55 EDTBy Ryan Felton and Dean Seal
Federal auto-safety regulators have opened an investigation into the adequacy of Tesla's December recall of 2 million vehicles equipped with Autopilot software, tying the technology to at least 14 fatalities, several dozen injuries and hundreds of crashes.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a report published Friday that its examination of Tesla's Autopilot, a driver-assist system that automates some driving tasks, uncovered a trend of "avoidable crashes involving hazards that would have been visible to an attentive driver."
NHTSA, the auto industry's top regulator, shed more light on the safety concerns that have long swirled around Autopilot, providing new information on fatalities and injuries linked to drivers' use of the controversial feature, which is widely available on Tesla models.
The new probe also marks an escalation of NHTSA's long-running scrutiny of the technology, which it had been investigating for nearly three years after numerous high-profile crashes, including ones that killed drivers.
On Friday, the regulator said it was closing its earlier probe and opening the new one into the adequacy of the recall remedy, which was deployed through a software update. The recall in December was among Tesla's largest to date and involved nearly all the vehicles it had sold in the U.S.
In all, NHTSA said it had identified 467 crashes involving Autopilot.
The regulator said its Office of Defects Investigation had discovered crashes that occurred after the recall and results from preliminary tests the agency performed on remedied vehicles.
Tesla issued the recall to address a previous NHTSA investigation into whether the Autopilot program contained a defect that created an unreasonable risk to vehicle safety.
The resulting recall affected more than 2 million Model Y, X, S, 3 and Cybertruck vehicles made since 2012 that were equipped with Autopilot. In updating the vehicle software, Tesla said it had installed new safeguards to prevent driver misuse.
Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment.
NHTSA offered more details on Friday about the work that led to the recall, saying its effort "showed evidence that Tesla's weak driver engagement system was not appropriate for Autopilot's permissive operating capabilities."
This mismatch resulted in a "critical safety gap" between drivers' expectations of Autopilot's safety and the system's actual capabilities, it added.
NHTSA also compared Autopilot to similar systems deployed by auto-industry rivals, saying it found Tesla's approach was an "industry outlier." The agency said the Autopilot name "elicits the idea of drivers not being in control," while other systems use terms like "assist" or "team" to imply that active supervision is required.
In its latest report, NHTSA took issue with Tesla's statements that a portion of the recall remedy required opt-in from the owner and could be reversed at the driver's discretion. It also said some Tesla updates appeared to address Autopilot issues that the NHTSA raised without identifying them as remedies.
"This investigation will consider why these updates were not a part of the recall or otherwise determined to remedy a defect that poses an unreasonable safety risk," the agency said.
Since the Autopilot update was rolled out, regulators have received an unusually high number of complaints about changes made to the controls. Some drivers say warnings have become excessive and are triggered when performing routine tasks.
Tesla has been beset with safety setbacks recently. Earlier this year, Tesla issued a recall for nearly all of its electric vehicles sold in the U.S. due to the font for some visual warning lights being too small.
Several other government agencies have opened their own investigations into Tesla's Autopilot. The Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission, in particular, are examining whether Tesla misled customers and investors with marketing that overstated the technology's capabilities, giving drivers a false impression of what it can realistically do.
Multiple lawsuits over crashes in which Autopilot was engaged also are pending. This month, the electric-car maker reached a settlement with the family of a driver who died in a 2018 crash.
In that case, Walter Huang, a 38-year-old Apple engineer, died on Highway 101 in California after his Model X sport-utility vehicle crashed into a highway barrier while he was using Autopilot. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed.
(Write to Ryan Felton at [email protected] and Dean Seal at [email protected])
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Neither of those statements are correct. About 1/2 the roundabout execution was fine in V11 (may be more if you ignored stopping at the roundabout when no cars were around). Now they are mostly ok - but I had to intervene atleast 20% of the time.
I keep repeating this - but a lot of people are yet to understand the significance. Its not about being flawless on one drive - but thousands of drives ! Not hundreds, thousands. In other words, you should be able to drive a whole year without FSD making a mistake. That is Robotaxi level.
You don't get to go from 1 intervention per 20 miles to 1 intervention per 10,000 miles by snapping a finger. It is hard, tiresome, time consuming work.
In other news - I closed my 138, 145 puts - and 175 calls just now - all for 1 cent.
This is the reason of the sharp fall started at 13:12 EST?Right on time...
U.S. Regulators Tie Tesla's Autopilot to More than a Dozen Fatalities, Hundreds of Crashes — WSJ
Apr 26, 202413:55 EDT
By Ryan Felton and Dean Seal
Federal auto-safety regulators have opened an investigation into the adequacy of Tesla's December recall of 2 million vehicles equipped with Autopilot software, tying the technology to at least 14 fatalities, several dozen injuries and hundreds of crashes.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a report published Friday that its examination of Tesla's Autopilot, a driver-assist system that automates some driving tasks, uncovered a trend of "avoidable crashes involving hazards that would have been visible to an attentive driver."
NHTSA, the auto industry's top regulator, shed more light on the safety concerns that have long swirled around Autopilot, providing new information on fatalities and injuries linked to drivers' use of the controversial feature, which is widely available on Tesla models.
The new probe also marks an escalation of NHTSA's long-running scrutiny of the technology, which it had been investigating for nearly three years after numerous high-profile crashes, including ones that killed drivers.
On Friday, the regulator said it was closing its earlier probe and opening the new one into the adequacy of the recall remedy, which was deployed through a software update. The recall in December was among Tesla's largest to date and involved nearly all the vehicles it had sold in the U.S.
In all, NHTSA said it had identified 467 crashes involving Autopilot.
The regulator said its Office of Defects Investigation had discovered crashes that occurred after the recall and results from preliminary tests the agency performed on remedied vehicles.
Tesla issued the recall to address a previous NHTSA investigation into whether the Autopilot program contained a defect that created an unreasonable risk to vehicle safety.
The resulting recall affected more than 2 million Model Y, X, S, 3 and Cybertruck vehicles made since 2012 that were equipped with Autopilot. In updating the vehicle software, Tesla said it had installed new safeguards to prevent driver misuse.
Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment.
NHTSA offered more details on Friday about the work that led to the recall, saying its effort "showed evidence that Tesla's weak driver engagement system was not appropriate for Autopilot's permissive operating capabilities."
This mismatch resulted in a "critical safety gap" between drivers' expectations of Autopilot's safety and the system's actual capabilities, it added.
NHTSA also compared Autopilot to similar systems deployed by auto-industry rivals, saying it found Tesla's approach was an "industry outlier." The agency said the Autopilot name "elicits the idea of drivers not being in control," while other systems use terms like "assist" or "team" to imply that active supervision is required.
In its latest report, NHTSA took issue with Tesla's statements that a portion of the recall remedy required opt-in from the owner and could be reversed at the driver's discretion. It also said some Tesla updates appeared to address Autopilot issues that the NHTSA raised without identifying them as remedies.
"This investigation will consider why these updates were not a part of the recall or otherwise determined to remedy a defect that poses an unreasonable safety risk," the agency said.
Since the Autopilot update was rolled out, regulators have received an unusually high number of complaints about changes made to the controls. Some drivers say warnings have become excessive and are triggered when performing routine tasks.
Tesla has been beset with safety setbacks recently. Earlier this year, Tesla issued a recall for nearly all of its electric vehicles sold in the U.S. due to the font for some visual warning lights being too small.
Several other government agencies have opened their own investigations into Tesla's Autopilot. The Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission, in particular, are examining whether Tesla misled customers and investors with marketing that overstated the technology's capabilities, giving drivers a false impression of what it can realistically do.
Multiple lawsuits over crashes in which Autopilot was engaged also are pending. This month, the electric-car maker reached a settlement with the family of a driver who died in a 2018 crash.
In that case, Walter Huang, a 38-year-old Apple engineer, died on Highway 101 in California after his Model X sport-utility vehicle crashed into a highway barrier while he was using Autopilot. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed.
(Write to Ryan Felton at [email protected] and Dean Seal at [email protected])
I had 10x $170 naked call and rolled 6x to $180 next week, 4x to naked put next week $165. What a shame.
Similar threads
