-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Wiki Selling TSLA Options - Be the House
- Thread starter adiggs
- Start date
Can't believe Reuters bought it on the dumbest reason I have ever seen. I was like..so Tesla will deploy robotaxis to compete against byd's 10k car what?
or like was rumored before where different messages went to different folks so leakers would "self identify"
More than likely it’s SOME truth, but more than likely it’s something like “not planning to build the Model 2 in MEXICO at this time”… since MEXICO is on hold, and Model 2 is apparently going to FIRST be built in Tejas. (I can say that since I’m Austin born)
Also, more than likely is that there isn’t going to BE a $25K car, but rather a $30K car.. the $25 car was talked about 2-3 years ago, and perpetuated and today we’re in a totally different world from inflation, other products in the market, appeal, politics, globalization, etc.. so it could be scrapped, but rather how do we make the current platform M3, less less money so that we can sell it at 29.9K and still make monies.
Last edited:
Especially with two different code names used. But three people supposedly confirmed it...
SpeedyEddy
Active Member
so now waiting for the second dip to BTO some nice leaps, not too far out. thinking oct-dec 2024 ATM
Knightshade
Well-Known Member
Not sure any laws are broken if they don't have evidence anyone involved in the story traded based on the movement.... doubly so if the folks currently in this thread suggesting it was an intentional fake leak to the news BY Tesla are correct.
SpeedyEddy
Active Member
it is always the same three persons "familiar with the matter", I guess . SOOO cheap.
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Slight OT .... the basic problem is Elon has no idea how it will work out. You can't look at the trend when disengagement rate goes from 2 per mile to 1 per mile and think every few months it will "exponentially" go down. Whole of V10 and V11, disengagement rate hardly budged. With 12, I think it has moved a bit .... but early days. Nowhere near enough data to assume an exponential trend like he does (just because it happened in AlphaGo).
If only you could have drawn these yellow lines in January.. ;-0
EVNow
Well-Known Member
If you have proof this article was to manipulate SP, I'm sure SEC would like to hear. But I doubt you have anything .... just because a piece of news moves SP doesn't mean the news was published to move SP.
Maybe we know the bottom now ($160)?
Because that was some terrible news
Should have drilled down to $140
It held the bottom range
Because that was some terrible news
Should have drilled down to $140
It held the bottom range
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Don't call the bottom until after ER.
SpeedyEddy
Active Member
So looking at a double intraday bottom 160.51 (@3/14)and today the 160.52, will we get a lower low to enter the accumulation phase, or do we skip that? What does EW tell us? I will first look at DL's latest contribution regarding EW, so maybe I will find the answer
Nobody suggested it was an intentional leak by Tesla to the news. Just that false information could have been shared with employees, that are subject to an NDA, such that if it did leak they could narrow down who the leakers are.
It’s actually a triple-bottom
$160.51 x2
$161.01
Triple bottom target: $207
If we retest and break $160.51 it’s a new low and we break the rectangle pattern.
Similar threads
