-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
I was hoping for 300%...maybe we can split the difference?
Also, worst week in 2.5 years last week? That doesn't seem right...
That article quotes that guy saying, "I think Tesla, similar situation, great earnings, highly shorted, highly hated disruptive technology, is one of the reasons why we could see Tesla do the same over the next 6-12 months". Same, referring to Zillow, which was 50% in 6-12 months.
This Yahoo Finance article quotes him saying, "I think Tesla is in a similar situation (to Zillow in late March). Great earnings, highly shorted, highly hated, disruptive technology we think Tesla could double in the next 6 to 12 months."
Who's right? Himself on TechInsider or himself on Yahoo Finance?
Johan
Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!
He said Zillow would double in a year, so far (6 months) it's up 50%. He's still predicting Zillow up another 50% in the next 6 months. And he thinks TSLA is in the same position starting now.
This thread on the tesla forum is claiming to show some crazy plans coming up, including a Tesla Model C in 2018-$15,000 city car...anyone believe this Dutch Autoweek report? I suppose we will see if the market believes these rumors or not tomorrow.
IMPORTANT: New Tesla Models announced on Dutch Autoweek news video: 2015 Model X, 2016 Model 3 + Model R, 2018 Model C ($15,000) | Forums | Tesla Motors
IMPORTANT: New Tesla Models announced on Dutch Autoweek news video: 2015 Model X, 2016 Model 3 + Model R, 2018 Model C ($15,000) | Forums | Tesla Motors
This isn't consistent with the Secret Master Plan. Tesla intends to stay in the premium segment, and no premium automaker sells a car for less than $20k.
I am not sure I agree with this line of thought. Elon wants to displace ICE's as his top priority. The LOGICAL thing to do, with a constrained battery supply, is make lots of tiny underpowered city cars and attempt to fill that market. That would be the way to displace the most tons of CO2. The reason TM doesn't do that, is that it would be market poison and be worse for EV adoption overall. But, once they had succeded for 6 years (2012-2018) with successful premium sedans, SUV, mid-range sedans and crossover SUVS, why would *pride* keep TM from making a small city car? They could hit it out of the park and sell lots of units. Once the monkey is off the back, why not? I say it cannot happen fast enough.
I have to be honest I don't see anything about always being a premium automaker in the Secret Master Plan. I think if they go into the (truly) mass market they should launch a different brand. At the end of the day, however, their mission is "to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport by bringing compelling mass market electric cars to market as soon as possible."
chickensevil
Active Member
Not saying I am buying this report at all, but if so, could this be the as of yet unrevealed extra spending on CapEx and R&D? I want to say no without thinking twice about it because there are so many things that screams "this is fake!" But... It is more plausible than the other suggestions like electric trains, electric planes, etc.
Hrmmmm...
Hrmmmm...
Zzzz...
Member
Chevrolet? No. Looks more like Daimler/Audi/Volkswagen etc, more like this:
- - - Updated - - -
This probably doesn't hurt.
Tesla Motors Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) was started as Outperform and given a $316 price target (versus a $238.49 close) at Pacific Crest.
Tesla Motors Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) was started as Outperform and given a $316 price target (versus a $238.49 close) at Pacific Crest.
- Status
Similar threads
