Futures are flat, but
MS analyst Adam Jonas reiterated an Overweight rating on Tesla Motors Inc but removed the $320.00 price target
Can someone confirm this?
No they didn't.
I just posted this comment on the Benzinga article:
UPDATE: Morgan Stanley Reiterates On Tesla Motors Inc As Stock May Be Up For Wrong Reasons | Benzinga
"Morgan Stanley…reiterated an Overweight rating on Tesla Motors Inc…but removed the $320.00 price target…In the report, Morgan Stanley noted, "…we believe the shares are worth $320, but perhaps not so quickly"
Your article contradicts itself. There is no removal of the $320 target.
Further, MS' 15Sep2014 report "Tesla: Stock Up For The Wrong Reasons?" is odd, raising spurious issues at best:
"1. EVs are failing categorically on a global scale. Tesla aside, nearly the
rest of the auto industry's efforts to successfully commercialize pure electric
propulsion have fallen well short of the mark."
Illogic: You just rendered irrelevant the auto industry's tepid EV offerings by noting "Tesla aside,…"
"2. China demand growth may be severely limited by Tesla's ability to
develop the supporting dealer and service infrastructure...Challenges with
infrastructure, local business practices and impeded technology enablers could
prove agonizingly tough to develop as fast as the market's expectations.
Or, maybe not. This is not new information.
"3. Democratization of EVs is going too far, as it requires breakthroughs
that may be too unreasonable to take for granted as a base case."
Again, or maybe not, and no new information.
"4. In an autonomous world, why will people buy a Tesla? Our 15 year
DCF coincides with the end of human driving...Moore's
Law and compute power to move people and things...."
Illogic: The most bizarre one: Suddenly connecting autonomous driving with eliminating all the overwhelming advantages of EVs vs. ICE vehicles? And throwing in Moore's Law for no apparent reason?