EPS probably shouldn't be the important number, but wall street is what it is.
I would be grateful for an indication that I am not going nuts.
According to GAAP, Q3, Tesla was a loss making company by $0.32 per share. That is the baseline for the bots and the screens in Wall Street.
From the Q3 Shareholders letter:
"Q3 non-GAAP revenues were $603 million, up 9% from Q2, while GAAP revenues were $431 million"
There is $172 Million USD missing due to GAAP adjustments, most of which pure BS due to lease accounting from 8 US States that are eligible for Tesla Finance via US Bank and Wells Fargo and hence get a residual guarantee that GAAP confuses with leasing.
Worse case scenario, 20% increase from Q3 revenues is $723 million. What if the GAAP adjustment is $51.6 million (25% of the Q3 deductions pro-rata) because in Q4 Tesla shipped a fraction of the goods to those 8 States where Lease Accounting deduction is possible.
We would have GAAP Revenues at $671 million (up from $431 million) and GAAP Profits at 75% of non-GAAP profits.
If Dave T and Vishipun are correct that is 35.5 $cts in GAAP profit, more than reversing a 32 $cts GAAP loss on Q3.
Analyst estimates:
"On a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis, Tesla is expected to post a loss of $US0.02 per share."
Tesla Announces Earnings Today -- Here's What To Expect | Business Insider
If it is in fact a GAAP profit of $35.5 cents or anything like it - which is HIGHLY LIKELY FOR VERY GOOD REASON OF SHIPPING CARS IN Q4 ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY TO PLACES WHERE LEASE ACCOUNTING DOES NOT APPLY - LIKE EUROPE
TSLA WILL GO TO THE MOON. FACT.