That's modern online journalism for you. Everyone's itching to cash in on news for clicks and traffic at the expense of factual integrity. Investors need to do their own due diligence and challenge / fact-check everything they read before making making investment decisions on such "news". Most do not, and unfortunately it's how a lot of first-time investors lose their investments.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Short-Term TSLA Price Movements - 2015
- Thread starter Robert.Boston
- Start date
-
- Tags
- TSLA
- Status
That's modern online journalism for you. Everyone's itching to cash in on news for clicks and traffic at the expense of factual integrity. Investors need to do their own due diligence and challenge / fact-check everything they read before making making investment decisions on such "news". Most do not, and unfortunately it's how a lot of first-time investors lose their investments.
TMC -> Gas2 -> CleanTechnica -> TMC
I have a dislike for all those rehash blogs that swamp google news search results.
doggusfluffy
Closed
Could Thursday's intrady low of $236.12 be the area of a double bottom today?
I do not see any additional bad news out today.
- Lots of duplicates of article about $4k losses per Model S produced.
Great fun to read as there are just too many flaws in it
- Lots of duplicates of article about hacking.
Will not really do a lot of harm as the hackers worked together with Tesla, already helped Tesla to fix the code and at least one of em is now working for Tesla.
In fact amazing to see these two articles flowing through the different news channes (even internationally) simply by copy and paste without almost no revision / fact checking.
If so it would be the first time I've bought perfectly on the bottom. I spent my last cash loading up on SEP calls...which are now cheaper than what I paid despite the little price jump to $238. Seems like we're set for a run of good news now...:wink:
- - - Updated - - -
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-08-10/hacking-into-a-tesla
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...usk-takes-tesla-to-500-000-cars-in-five-years
Last edited:
MartinAustin
Active Member
everman
Member
Slow and steady march upwards on average volume.
It's always tough when you see short term weakness and put in a limit buy order for a little lower, and then you find yourself rooting for it to go down. My particular limit is $231. Not sure I'm going to see it, and may have to move the goal posts here in a few days. Can we get a flash-crash down to $230, just for 5 minutes? :biggrin:
It's always tough when you see short term weakness and put in a limit buy order for a little lower, and then you find yourself rooting for it to go down. My particular limit is $231. Not sure I'm going to see it, and may have to move the goal posts here in a few days. Can we get a flash-crash down to $230, just for 5 minutes? :biggrin:
bsd
Member
To provide sufficient value to crackers so that they don't look for a 'customer' for their exploits. Tesla wants to be their best-paying customer.
hockeythug
Active Member
Looks like he was responding to someone but sent it out as a normal message instead of replying to the question. Appears it is related to this though:
https://twitter.com/bi11k/status/630768512789835776
Much to do about nothing.
Last edited:
Looked at the AutoBild Website and in an article published today they say just the opposite:
Translation: A reveal at IAA 2015 seems unlikely, as Tesla prefers a reveal away from any motor show.
Wonder where the belgian site you quoted got that info from...
Hm, this is getting interesting: searching for "IAA 2015 Tesla" here gives the following headline:
"At IAA 2015 the EV will finally be revealed."
And searching it on google gives the same but says it is 3 days old, so maybe it was changed which would also explain the other site´s info...
- - - Updated - - -
O.k., got more info, starting a thread in the X section.
"At IAA 2015 the EV will finally be revealed."
And searching it on google gives the same but says it is 3 days old, so maybe it was changed which would also explain the other site´s info...
- - - Updated - - -
O.k., got more info, starting a thread in the X section.
CALGARYARSENAL
Member
Nothing to see here.
That's just the cached result. It means Autobild corrected their unsourced claims.
webcache: Tesla Model X (IAA 2015): Model X kurz vor Marktstart - autobild.de
There are a number of speculated reasons. Some benign: he could use a break, some not so. I don't think we will ever know for sure but if you would like to be part of a group 'thank you': http://www.teslamotorsclub.com/showthread.php/51316-Thank-you-Jerome
Indeed that is ridiculous FUD about imagined losses on each new car sold. In reality, Tesla enjoys a hefty profit margin on each new car sold. The authors disingenuously count development expenses for future car models, energy storage systems and the battery Gigafactory. They make it appear that each additional car sold further reduces profits. Pure nonsense.
The fact that the misleading article was written by Detroit based reporters is not inconsequential. Their abilities to gather information on the auto industry are highly dependent on keeping lines of communication open by pleasing Detroit auto executives. Pleasing California based Tesla Motors is of little or no concern to them. Meanwhile, Detroit automakers advertise heavily in the media that rely on Reuters articles. Tesla Motors advertises nowhere.
Definitely the $4k loss per vehicle article is making the rounds in the media echo chamber. That's the power of Reuters and outsourced reporting, where media outlets don't bother to do their own work, they just crib off someone else's crap.
Tesla can make this all go away with a few pieces of good news.
Tesla can make this all go away with a few pieces of good news.
hockeythug
Active Member
- Status
Similar threads
