Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Short-Term TSLA Price Movements - 2016

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gentlemen's bet? :biggrin: I got $190

AlMc, you won the bet by a nickel. Congrats.

In the defense of my horse in this race, if he wasn't crowded near the rail by the shorts coming into the final stretch, I think he would have had that 192.50.

Edit: The good news is that we closed far enough into the green and with a nice upward burst towards the end so that we could see a bump up right after opening on Monday. Whether that bump can last throughout the first hour or so of trading or will be built upon is anyone's guess at this point. Stay tuned.
 
Last edited:
Big hands are smart, you need to think why they choose other stocks/sectors instead of TSLA which is obviously bargain from the price history in the past 24 months. I'm not saying TSLA can't jump big on next week, but the price action in last two weeks definitely not good.

Low volume means big hands are preoccupied with other stocks/sectors today. Also, today is OPEX.
 
This is huge! Company responsible for California Methane fiasco is facing fines of $25 million for every day that has passed since they became aware of the leak. This could easily equal tens of billions of dollars.

https://www.rt.com/usa/330396-gas-leak-california-lawsuit/


Edit: Misread the quote. Still, this will almost certainly lead to more lawsuits, and a settlement similar to or larger than the BP oil spill.

Wasn't someone quoted as saying they've known about the leak for years?

The Company Behind LA's Methane Disaster Knew Its Well Was Leaking 24 Years Ago | Motherboard

That would be $3.65 billion in fines from this one organization.
 
Last edited:
I'm not asking how the FCF should be calculated. I'm asking given TSLA does not use non-GAAP in their own FCF calculation, why should we? BTW, the refundable deposit is peanuts compared to the revenue from leasing, which is 1/3 of the GAAP rev and 1/4 of the non-GAAP.

There is only one way to calculate FCF, it's not open to interpretation. Simple way to think about it: You look at the balance at beginning of the quarter, vs end of the quarter. If balance is higher at the end of the month, you have positive cash flow.

Add: Both FCF and revenue non-GAAP or GAAP are calculated independently, from the same set of data. Raw transactional data. There is NO formula to get to FCF from revenue results and vice versa. You just don't know what parts are deffer-ed etc.
I know this as I work in domain industry. We sell domain for 10 years at $10 a year. That is $100 FCF, but 83c revenue monthly deferr-ed over 10 years. Different businesses will pay attention more to one or another, but you always have to look at FCF to not overextend oneself. For our business, that's also any reasonable way to measure success internally, as deffered revenue doesn't do us any good, it can't pay salaries...
 
Last edited:
AlMc, you won the bet by a nickel. Congrats.

In the defense of my horse in this race, if he wasn't crowded near the rail by the shorts coming into the final stretch, I think he would have had that 192.50.
.

Man you seem really hung up on the shorts :smile: You do realize with over 25% already sold short it is far more likely the "shorts" are the buyers here given we're down about 20% from the 200 dma, covering to take big gains and not being greedy.
 
CapEx is a straight swap of Cash for Assets. It is neutral in terms of profitability prior to depreciation and if they bought something well (like $6 million for a $50 million stamping machine) then you'd have to be a dunce to imagine that this is a bad thing for the outlook of the business.
An important factor, that's almost never mentioned in discussions about TSLA's CapEx, is how they actually spend the larger chunks of that money:
Nuumi building - Great Deal.
Stamping machine - Great Deal.
Solyndra building lease - Probably an excellent deal.
The cavernous Solyndra building–which the commercial brokerage firm JLL marketed under the banner “Think Big” –is where Solyndra solar tubes once rolled off final assembly lines. But it’s been embarrassingly empty ever since the corrupt startup spectacularly imploded.

Plans to purchase metals (e.g. nickel), directly from the Canadian Mines.
Signing purchase agreements with small lithium mines, to help them obtain funding for production (brilliant - zero cash move with a potentially huge payoff).

And some people think that GM might end up with lower battery pack costs than Tesla. That's about as likely as a Pop Warner Football Team beating an NFL Superbowl winning team.

Julian, you said that the GF would be the last time a battery producer allowed a car company to be a partner. I don't believe that Tesla needs Panasonic's expertise to build 18650 Cells. I think Panasonic's participation helps, but I believe that the main thing that Tesla needed-needs is access to capital.
 
Grossly off-topic, but what the heck. In the long run it's going to help the stock, but not the short-term.

A brief moment to celebrate the fact that in New Mexico today, members of the Tesla Club of New Mexico showed up at the State Capitol with six Model Ss of various colors and configurations, parked at the Capitol steps for a photo op, then went in and got introduced on the floor of the Senate by a very supportive State Senator who invited the legislators to come out and check out the cars and learn more about the benefits of electric vehicles. This was all part of an effort to educate the legislature here that there are laws on the books (that they probably are not even aware of) that are harming NM Tesla owners by blocking Tesla from opening up any service centers in-state, and blocking Tesla from opening up any stores to sell cars. We are trying to fix that in time for the rollout of the affordable Model III. it's a long agonizing process, but today was a baby step. It was fun hearing State Senators "whoop" and cheer when they saw the Tesla Club of New Mexico stand up in the Senate Gallery.

IMG_1281.jpg

IMG_1282.jpg
 
Can someone explain to me what Elon Musks SEC filling today means? Did he buy stock?

SEC Filings | Tesla Motors

He exercised right to buy 532000 actions at ~$6, which is price of stock when he was granted these options.

This is presumably because one of the goals have been hit, as his stock options vest as milestones are achieved...
But it could have been one of the old milestones (Model X design etc...), as options typically have 7 or 10 year until expiry, and he may have kept them until they almost expired
 
Last edited:
An important factor, that's almost never mentioned in discussions about TSLA's CapEx, is how they actually spend the larger chunks of that money:
Nuumi building - Great Deal.
Stamping machine - Great Deal.
Solyndra building lease - Probably an excellent deal.
The cavernous Solyndra building–which the commercial brokerage firm JLL marketed under the banner “Think Big” –is where Solyndra solar tubes once rolled off final assembly lines. But it’s been embarrassingly empty ever since the corrupt startup spectacularly imploded.

Plans to purchase metals (e.g. nickel), directly from the Canadian Mines.
Signing purchase agreements with small lithium mines, to help them obtain funding for production (brilliant - zero cash move with a potentially huge payoff).

And some people think that GM might end up with lower battery pack costs than Tesla. That's about as likely as a Pop Warner Football Team beating an NFL Superbowl winning team.

Julian, you said that the GF would be the last time a battery producer allowed a car company to be a partner. I don't believe that Tesla needs Panasonic's expertise to build 18650 Cells. I think Panasonic's participation helps, but I believe that the main thing that Tesla needed-needs is access to capital.

Panasonic also helps them avoid having to forge their own alliances with suppliers and/or figure certain things out on their own. Why reinvent the wheel if you don't need to. Panasonic makes really good batteries. This could only happen if Panasonic's suppliers were also top notch. So why not bring them all under one roof and have them do what they do best? I agree that they could probably do it themselves... but I think it was more than just about access to capital. It would have cost Tesla far more than the 1.8B that Panasonic is bringing to the table since they would have to do a lot of extra R&D work to solve the same problems that Panasonic and its suppliers solved long, long ago. The only reason Tesla would shift this is if they get issues with suppliers (as they have elsewhere) and therefore it becomes more profitable to invest the funding now themselves to bring the product to the table in the timeframe that they need.

This is why I never understood people's arguments that they didn't understand why Tesla couldn't ramp production up faster than they have been and such, when other manufacturers can take a concept and churn out 1M of them in the first year. Well yeah, but companies like GM, Toyota, and VW have also been making cars for over 100 years.... so they didn't have to solve the problems of manufacturing scale because they solved that 100 years ago and have been iterating on it ever since.

This also works in our favor as the ICE manufacturers keep delaying the transition to an EV. They don't currently have the expertise and knowledge to make complex battery systems (e.g. 7k cells being micromanaged) and high performing AC Motors... and other critical power systems that are part of an EV. This is going to take them time and money. Funny how Porsche is having to invest something like 1B in retooling of their factories so they can actually make EVs... guess everyone is going to have to pay the same price Tesla has had to (maybe more) in order to shift to EVs. The only current advantage that a current manufacturer like VW, GM, and Toyota have is that they are already sitting on a decent pile of cash. But I am sure it would take all of Toyota's pile of cash (something like 50BN) in order for them to shift their current 10M in annual car production to EVs... as it seems it takes about 1BN per 500k cars. How do you sell that to shareholders? Hey guys we are going to sink all of our cash holdings into reinventing the company to be an EV maker. Or even if Toyota went 100% Hydrogen... just retooling their factories alone would destroy their cash and then some... Turns out it is just as expensive to retool a working factory as it is to put in equipment in an empty factory... who knew?

- - - Updated - - -

Can someone explain to me what Elon Musks SEC filling today means? Did he buy stock?

SEC Filings | Tesla Motors

He exercised right to buy 532000 actions at ~$6, which is price of stock when he was granted these options.

This is presumable because one of the goals have been hit, as his stock options vest as milestones are achieved...
But it could have been one of the old milestones (Model X design etc...), as options typically have 7 or 10 year until expiry, and he may have kept them until they almost expired

This is a very good thing to see. So, all those people who have been complaining that stock options become vested and other executives sold them off at face value rather than buying them, I (and I am sure others) have mentioned at that point that this was normal. Many executives only hold on to a portion of the stock options they are granted and sell the rest off for either cash or to diversify it elsewhere. And I also added that Elon was the *only* one to watch for on these, because he has stated that he will not sell his shares. He stated in the past that he was the first one in, and he will be the last one out. Of course all those that like to make huge negative articles about the doom and gloom of Executives selling their stock options, won't likely write any articles about how this is a positive side that Elon PURCHASED all ~500k shares that he was granted.
 
Man you seem really hung up on the shorts :smile: You do realize with over 25% already sold short it is far more likely the "shorts" are the buyers here given we're down about 20% from the 200 dma, covering to take big gains and not being greedy.

That's what you would think, but short interest has increased drastically from December updates to the recent January update. Don't always assume that shorts would be smart and cover when SP falls only $5-$10 near a two-year low, but they seem to get greedy. Just like how longs can get greedy with major price increases, it does go both ways.

A brief moment to celebrate the fact that in New Mexico today, members of the Tesla Club of New Mexico showed up at the State Capitol with six Model Ss of various colors and configurations, parked at the Capitol steps for a photo op, then went in and got introduced on the floor of the Senate by a very supportive State Senator who invited the legislators to come out and check out the cars and learn more about the benefits of electric vehicles. This was all part of an effort to educate the legislature here that there are laws on the books (that they probably are not even aware of) that are harming NM Tesla owners by blocking Tesla from opening up any service centers in-state, and blocking Tesla from opening up any stores to sell cars. We are trying to fix that in time for the rollout of the affordable Model III. it's a long agonizing process, but today was a baby step. It was fun hearing State Senators "whoop" and cheer when they saw the Tesla Club of New Mexico stand up in the Senate Gallery.

That's incredible, hats off to all participants. Moments like these show why Tesla is so unique, in that their customer base will go out of their way to help them succeed. Hopefully those Senators listened with open ears.
 
He exercised right to buy 532000 actions at ~$6, which is price of stock when he was granted these options.

This is presumably because one of the goals have been hit, as his stock options vest as milestones are achieved...
But it could have been one of the old milestones (Model X design etc...), as options typically have 7 or 10 year until expiry, and he may have kept them until they almost expired

Elon had un-exercised, vested option for approximately 6.7 million shares under the December, 2009 incentive plan with an exercise price of $6.63/ share. He exercised about 8% of those options recently by paying into Tesla's treasury about $3.5 million ($6.63 x 532,000) The market value of the transaction is approximately $102 million. He must exercise the remaining 6,168,000 options before early December or they will become worthless.
 
Elon had un-exercised, vested option for approximately 6.7 million shares under the December, 2009 incentive plan with an exercise price of $6.63/ share. He exercised about 8% of those options recently by paying into Tesla's treasury about $3.5 million ($6.63 x 532,000) The market value of the transaction is approximately $102 million. He must exercise the remaining 6,168,000 options before early December or they will become worthless.

7 years would be short in terms of option expiry in silicon valley
 
This is a very good thing to see. So, all those people who have been complaining that stock options become vested and other executives sold them off at face value rather than buying them, I (and I am sure others) have mentioned at that point that this was normal. Many executives only hold on to a portion of the stock options they are granted and sell the rest off for either cash or to diversify it elsewhere. And I also added that Elon was the *only* one to watch for on these, because he has stated that he will not sell his shares. He stated in the past that he was the first one in, and he will be the last one out. Of course all those that like to make huge negative articles about the doom and gloom of Executives selling their stock options, won't likely write any articles about how this is a positive side that Elon PURCHASED all ~500k shares that he was granted.

I thought I would add to my own post regarding this. From the last reported earnings this was what it contained for the 2012 CEO Grant section on page 18:
In August 2012, our Board of Directors granted 5,274,901 stock options to our CEO (2012 CEO Grant). The 2012 CEO Grant consists of ten vesting tranches with a vesting schedule based entirely on the attainment of both performance conditions and market conditions, assuming continued employment and service to us through each vesting date.

Each of the ten vesting tranches requires a combination of one of the ten pre-determined performance milestones and an incremental increase in our market capitalization of $4.0 billion, as compared to the initial market capitalization of $3.2 billion measured at the time of the 2012 CEO Grant.

As of September 30, 2015, the market conditions for seven vesting tranches and the following performance milestones were achieved and approved by our Board of Directors:
  • Successful completion of the Model X Alpha Prototype; and

  • Successful completion of the Model X Beta Prototype

As of September 30, 2015, the following three performance milestones were considered probable of achievement:
  • Successful completion of the Model 3 Alpha Prototype

  • Aggregate vehicle production of 100,000 vehicles; and

  • Successful completion of the Model 3 Beta Prototype

The following performance milestone was achieved in the third quarter and ratified by the Compensation Committee on October 6, 2015.
  • Completion of the first Model X Production Vehicle

We begin recording stock-based compensation expense as each milestone becomes probable. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $6.8 million and $9.5 million related to this grant. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $3.8 million and $18.2 million related to this grant.

No cash compensation has been received by our CEO for his services to the company.

So it should be noted that in order for them to pay out *all* of the currently given out 7 of the 10 vesting tranches also requires a market cap of 3.2B + 4B * 7 = 31.2BN market cap which is at current share count is 238.25 (give or take a penny). I don't know how long the share price has to sit at that value for it to count, but since they considered the 7th on achieved as of Oct 6, and at that time the shareprice closed at 241.46, then they likely were able to pay that out. If I also recall it takes about 3 months or so from submitting something like this to have it actually happen given required waiting periods with the SEC which is why we are only just now seeing the purchase go through.

Now I know you might be tempted to say that it isn't fair that after that the price went down, etc, etc... I would remind you that there are 3 more compensations coming up of which 1 of them should have actually already happened (Aggregate vehicle production of 100,000 vehicles). This will also require that the Market cap go up another 4B to allow pay out which is 35.2B or 268.80 (give or take) a share. So, I feel this is extremely relevant to the short term price, because now, more than ever, Elon has motivation to not just avoid saying things that would destroy share value (cause... you know... that's never happened... -_-) but he is actually motivated to get the price back into the 270s.

Also, if I am not mistaken these expire at the end of 2016... I would have to dig up the original note back in 2012 to find out, but there is an expiration date on it... So given that he is unlikely to throw away money, I would expect there is enough motivation for Elon to ensure full attention and focus is on proper execution of the company to ensure appreciation of share value. So my 1 year PT is 270 (or higher) just on this alone :D
 
[Regards Model X ramp concerns.....]
Again, I hope someone slams me with facts. I want to be wrong, or on track to be wrong very soon.

There is a Model X by-invitation event at Fremont tonight. A fair chance of some material reassurance going into Friday from this event.

- - - Updated - - -

I'm sorry Julian but you know too much about GAAP and non gaap to try and lie to me that you aren't an Accountant. :wink: And not just any Accountant, but rather a CFO or director of accounting

Very kind of you but no, I am just an entrepreneur / investor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.