You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know longs are not all in. I still plan to add. Some of my friends had zero position now start to seriously look at it. The guy behind me this morning in the reservation line said he regret didn't buy during recent pullback, now he is looking for opportunity to buy a large chunk.I just had an interesting thought. Tesla has probably raised all of last years cash "burn" in one day on customer deposits (including reservations made tonight). Think about that for a minute... Plus they sold at least 3,000 X I would guess, plus at least 13,000 S. I think there is a chance they would be close to cash flow break even before these reservations...
I think the X deliveries will surprise. But who knows. Maybe all the longs are in, and all the shorts are in, and only a few people leaning one way or the other will be enough to break the tie.
Interesting to watch. Not feeling very optimistic at all about my lotto call options purchased yesterday and today, but that's why they are called lotto tickets...
The critical part here is the deposit they collect today is not free cash flow. And looking at the QC issues this quarter, GM on the X may not be very pleasing. Plus, many X delivered this quarter are signature series, you have to take 40k deposit off the revenue generated from those. If we assume 1300 sig, then that would mean 52m not making it into free cash flow. All in all, free cash flow positive this quarter is not likely IMO.
Because the deposit is considered as liability. Therefore not "free cash flow". FCF is the metric people usually look at. Of course they can use "cash flow from core operations", but it is their own custom made metric and is less accepted by investors in general.Cash flow is cash flow. Why would it not count?
In contrast, the $40k sig deposits will count as revenue, but will not count as cash flow because they counted towards cash flow when the deposits were made.
Because the deposit is considered as liability. Therefore not "free cash flow". FCF is the metric people usually look at. Of course they can use "cash flow from core operations", but it is their own custom made metric and is less accepted by investors in general.
If you take 40,000 off revenue for X sigs, why wouldn't you count the new deposits. I assume it's cash and a liability. You are counting sales as a negative because they had deposits and deposits because they are future sales. I think sales are good and deposits are good.Cash flow is cash flow. Why would it not count?
In contrast, the $40k sig deposits will count as revenue, but will not count as cash flow because they counted towards cash flow when the deposits were originally made.
The 40k for sig X was counted as both asset as in cash and liability as in deposit for the past two years or so. If you count that as revenue, it was counted the time of reservation. So when delivered, you are realizing sale price - 40k of revenue this quarter. But in the meantime, you freed up 40k of liability. It's a time displacement.If you take 40,000 off revenue for X sigs, why wouldn't you count the new deposits. I assume it's cash and a liability. You are counting sales as a negative because they had deposits and deposits because they are future sales. I think sales are good and deposits are good.
Congrats, Causalien. You've officially joined the 'biased' club. So can we no longer count on the Crystal Ball?I reserved. It was just another day for everyone else, but a watershed moment for people who jumped for the idea of a better future.
Flip side to this, I can no longer be an objective voice in TSLA stock movements since I am now emotionally invested in the product.
Ugh. Got my first Trailing Stop order inputted! Yay! But, it didn't trigger when it fell a bunch there --- not that I ended up wanting it to, but I felt that it "should have" (and I would have been comfortable either way), but now I'm paranoid I don't know how to verify what the current Trailing Stop trigger level happens to be at (platform OptionsHouse); anybody know? I guess I have to call customer service ...
Got in way high, at 231.95, but saw instant trends so was comfortable if I had quick ability to take a small loss. Really wanted to get my first trailing stop entered. Now at a trail stop of 0.90 with stock at 233.85, and waiting until it crests 234.1 to raise my trail stop to 1.10.
That triggered it. It works. Only made ~$1K. Next time I'll have enough confidence to use the Trail Stop Limit and set a limit offset. I have to apologize to everyone for my market sell order there that caused a run-down in the price as all the fish jumped on the bid spreads for a large sell amount. So am I the "efficient sucker" who makes the "marketplace work efficiently"?
Technically customer deposits do contribute to free cash flow, but issuing debt or equity to fund capital expwnditures would not. It may not be sufficient to reach positive free cash flow, but it does move in the right direction.The critical part here is the deposit they collect today is not free cash flow. And looking at the QC issues this quarter, GM on the X may not be very pleasing. Plus, many X delivered this quarter are signature series, you have to take 40k deposit off the revenue generated from those. If we assume 1300 sig, then that would mean 52m not making it into free cash flow. All in all, free cash flow positive this quarter is not likely IMO.
The 40k for sig X was counted as both asset as in cash and liability as in deposit for the past two years or so. If you count that as revenue, it was counted the time of reservation. So when delivered, you are realizing sale price - 40k of revenue this quarter. But in the meantime, you freed up 40k of liability. It's a time displacement.
Disclaimer: I'm not a CPA, everything is my understanding after reading stuff on the internet.
So all those sig X 40k will be revenue and also increase free cash flow? The model 3 deposit can't count as either revenue or free cash flow right? Just cash as asset with a matching amount of liability?You are right about the asset and liability when a deposit is taken, but wrong on revenue. Revenue is counted when product is sold, or delivered in this case. I am an accountant and former CPA. Unfortunately I am a bit rusty on the cash flow side of things so I could be wrong about how that works, but I know how revenue is counted, and it's counted at the time of delivery. Deposit timing is completely irrelevant to when revenue is booked, at least for Tesla, but actually that is true of most companies.
If it is prepaid I think it counts FCF, but these deposits are refundable and the customer can take it back any time in the next 18 months or so. Therefore I don't think they can be counted as FCF.Technical customer deposits do contribute to free cash flow, but issuing debt or equity would not. It may not be sufficient to reach positive free cash flow, but it does move in the right direction.
The critical part here is the deposit they collect today is not free cash flow. And looking at the QC issues this quarter, GM on the X may not be very pleasing. Plus, many X delivered this quarter are signature series, you have to take 40k deposit off the revenue generated from those. If we assume 1300 sig, then that would mean 52m not making it into free cash flow. All in all, free cash flow positive this quarter is not likely IMO.
So all those sig X 40k will be revenue and also increase free cash flow? The model 3 deposit can't count as either revenue or free cash flow right? Just cash as asset with a matching amount of liability?