israndy
Supercharger Hunter
Actually it's spelled 'club'Sorry cult.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually it's spelled 'club'Sorry cult.
Nope it’s a cult now. Nothing like it used to be.Actually it's spelled 'club'
It’s not a Cult, it’s not a Cult, it’s not a Cult……Nope it’s a cult now. Nothing like it used to be.
No, it is not, stop repeating it. If it was - we would have new EPA tests(we don't) and it would be for all models(not select ones)This is due to new 2024 EPA rules
Closer to real world driving conditions
Stop reading articles and read actual facts. "Articles" are not facts...The news article clearly said the new EPA guidelines caused a revision in range.
*Sigh*...When I speak of reality, I'm talking about the independent tests "everyone" does
They consistently show tesla slightly optimistic and Porsche heavily pessimistic on range.
You used a false precept to push your “concern of this ideal” narrative and you still want to because it fits your worldview. Disgusting and wrong. You must work in media.At the time I posted this thread, word was the app was removed/hidden. Sure- that specific case has become a non-issue since then. However, discussing the concept and concern of this ideal is not an issue. You don’t have to continue to participate in the conversation.
You are incapable of putting past how this “news” was brought about and simply discussing the ideal. That’s fine. Ignore this conversation.You used a false precept to push your “concern of this ideal” narrative and you still want to because it fits your worldview. Disgusting and wrong. You must work in media.
You’re incapable of recognizing the reality that your false narrative is fueled by a false precept. And you’re asking people to engage in it further. Disgusting.You are incapable of putting past how this “news” was brought about and simply discussing the ideal. That’s fine. Ignore this conversation.
I have, in fact, repeatedly asked for you to ignore this conversation.You’re incapable of recognizing the reality that your false narrative is fueled by a false precept. And you’re asking people to engage in it further. Disgusting.
It’s not worth trying to reason with the unreasonable. He’s a zealot through and through.I have, in fact, repeatedly asked for you to ignore this conversation.
Oh brother. Elons number 1 fool is back.Tesla is currently succeeding with their toy. No need to worry.
They will continue to succeed - toy or not.
The CT has too many successful features to fail in a single area. If anyone believes that the CT has failed on towing - fine - that won't stop its success.
How many people do you see on the roads towing something? If Tesla loses the towing customer base for now.... ok fine.... it's still selling its other features just fine.
The EPA, once again, has a separate highway cycle. It is not 70mph, but close. It is listed separately in their PDF where they list the kWh pulled and consumption for each run. It is obviously not as comprehensive as a 70mph run from 100% to 0%.Because the EPA results are still wildly inaccurate for highway speeds
What are you, 5 yrs old, going to my other posts on other threads and voting them down?? You realize why you're getting down voted, right? It's because you can't seem to have a conversation without acting like a giant anus. You *seem* to be knowledgeable on the subject but you shoot yourself in the foot by presenting that knowledge like a complete and utter jackass.@jkdman123 you can click disagree all you want or you can actually learn something, your choice. Either way zero f... given
FYI, most of the disagrees you get are because you behave like a pedantic jerk toward people.I can't speak for the other user, but 5 years ago I was right here pointing out Sebas predicted dates were unrealistic (as were some of his earlier references to the speed of horse->car transition in that big youtube link everyone kept pointing out to say ALL EVS BY 2025) and getting hammered with disagrees for a take that turned out 100% accurate.
'Every New Vehicle Will Be Electric' by 2025, Disruption Expert Says
A Silicon Valley entrepreneur and author has explained how electric vehicles will disrupt and change transportation across the world. But first, Tony Seba — who is an instructor in disruption and clean energy at Stanford University’s Continuing Studies Program, explained to an audience at the...www.renewableenergyworld.com
He then cites Dysons 2.5B investment in EVs as an example of disrupting the industry. Remind me how that investment turned out?
IIRC he later moved his goalposts to 2030 (also entirely unrealistic- esp. given he's talking ALL vehicles not just cars, in ALL countries).... not sure where said goalposts are these days- perhaps he's finally stopped giving hard dates that aren't happening, I dunno.
Now if you want to follow Seba as "Guy who sees disruptive trends early in the trend"- Sure-- he's your guy... But it's kinda late in the EV thing for that to be relevant? That same 5 years ago it was obvious to (nearly) EVERYONE here that EVENTUALLY all vehicles would be EVs. It was obvious to a much smaller # it wouldn't be 2025. Or 2030.
If you want to follow Seba as "Guy who accurately predicts the timeline of those trends- especially for investment purposes (which some were doing here those 5 years ago)"which is the main way he'd have any relevance in this thread at this point- then you might want to reconsider him being your guy.
Accept what you are.....we haveSo if I criticize Israeli government, I'm an antisemite.
If I complain that I'm called an antisemite because I criticized Israel, I'm again an antisemite.
Oh, yes I'm sure you will call me antisemite because of this post as well. I cannot win.
As a Tesla employee and/or simp, please explain why any of us should have to pay to update the MCU when we bought our vehicles saying they had ALL the equipment needed to have FSD...them not being about to get it to work on MCU1 should be there problem, NOT the early adopters. I'm not trying to run Windows 10 on a Windows CE machine, but we were told FSD would work and I never saw the * saying MCU1 would just be forgotten about. Make it make sense.