Does he post here on TMC?James's professional background is working on company financial statements and business valuation so he knows his stuff and adds a lot to the Tesla investor community.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does he post here on TMC?James's professional background is working on company financial statements and business valuation so he knows his stuff and adds a lot to the Tesla investor community.
Yup. But you know maybe we have a bias here. Tesla is a cutting edge technology company so any hiccups will get press. I'm sure when coal power plants were a new concept, there were plenty of press, good and bad back in the days. But after a century no one cares anymore and have accepted the risks that comes from them like ice car fires.Of course this will get FAR more press than the coal power plant in the US that just got on fire.
Fires in electrical switchboards and transformers are relatively common and can be very severe. There is a huge amount of electrical current flowing in and out of these megapacks. All it would take would be an incorrect termination, a faulty relay or switch installation to cause a short circuit and resulting arc fire. So it doesn't have to be the megapack itself that starts the fire, although that is definitely a possibility. Any fault in manufacture or the installation of a big battery is likely to show up during initial testing. I'd be more concerned if this occurred after commissioning when the installation was fully operational.
By the way how much does Wall Street value the energy business anyway? I thought it was close to zero.
I agree with @Chenkers post above. I’m an electrician and IMO the most likely scenario is an installation worker in the field did not make a crimp correctly or forgot to torque a connection down.Arson seems unlikely as it's a pack deep into the system that caught on fire. If it's arson then I would say parameter packs would be on fire and more than one pack.
This is most likely due to an electrical component that blew causing a fire since they are likely to fail at the first phase of testing. No big deal really and a learning opportunity for Tesla.
Since it's a French company that installed it, maybe sabotage?
I hope you are right. I need a cheaper entry today
I read it as… arson.. french company.. sabotage… It‘s a word play. But maybe I am dense.I downvoted that, not because I think it couldn't have been sabotage, but because a French Company installing it would not increase the risk of sabotage.
However, whenever something threatens to disrupt profitable industries and create massive change, sabotage is always one possibility. People don't like change, especially when that change is the rapid shrinking of their bottom line.
Not that I'm aware of, he's mainly active on twitter. @DaveT has had him on his YouTube channel a couple of times. Below is the first and more in depth interview from March:Does he post here on TMC?
An OTA update for loose connectors???I agree with @Chenkers post above. I’m an electrician and IMO the most likely scenario is an installation worker in the field did not make a crimp correctly or forgot to torque a connection down.
Then during commissioning the loose connection overheated and started a fire.
If this is what happen. I’m sure Tesla will follow up with an OTA update with a fix in a few weeks. And just for clarification this statement is not sarcasm.
No. Fault sensing. Delta A, Delta V. Depending where in the power electronics they have their sensors and shunts.An OTA update for loose connectors???
I see so many posts passing by about what analysts are thinking.
Maybe Stephenson is a wrong example for me to use here, but please remember all those years we were convinced that they didn't have any clue what was going to happen with TSLA.
And they sure didn't.
And now, when the stock price is for some time staying at the same level, we are looking at them again?
Leave them be. Read the other posts here that inform you about what really is happening.
It cuts the nonsense and you will know where we are heading.
Does he post here on TMC?
It's pretty amazing the amount of people who watch and react to what is clearly theater.I quit paying serious attention to what Wall Street analysts thought about 25 years ago. Because my own observations showed me they were a contrarian indicator. It got to the point that I would second guess my decision to buy a stock if too many analysts agreed it was a buy. I'm dead serious! All of my best moves were contrary to analyst ratings (both in the short-term AND the early buys of my long-term mega-wins).
I'm saying this is not a coincidence.
Yup. But you know maybe we have a bias here. Tesla is a cutting edge technology company so any hiccups will get press. I'm sure when coal power plants were a new concept, there were plenty of press, good and bad back in the days. But after a century no one cares anymore and have accepted the risks that comes from them like ice car fires.
I read it as… arson.. french company.. sabotage… It‘s a word play. But maybe I am dense.
Edit: Not sure I need to point out that sabotage is french…
I guess the shorts think of it as like being short a put? Business goes up zero payoff, business goes down negative payoff. They'll justify it with things like reputational issues. The more desperate they are the more creative they'll be.By the way how much does Wall Street value the energy business anyway? I thought it was close to zero.
I don't think @Maarten is taking a shot at James but rather stating why take a look at what Analysts have to say?James is a long Tesla investor. I respect him quite a bit. He is very sharp, no-nonsense, and is among those that does stuff like the accountant.