This really puts things into perspective. It's hard to argue the numbers, which show insane Tesla growth and ICE retraction:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just for comparison, starting at 0.9 million in 2021 and adding 50% every year would get Tesla to more than 34 million in 2030. Question is probably if cell chemistry resources will be limiting along the way.
A car isn’t considered produced until complete and ready for delivery. So all those units sitting in a lot waiting for parts are work-in-process. They will show up in inventory cost on financials though (just not as finished goods).Does Tesla count cars parked in lots waiting for a part as “produced” car in the quarter? If not then the numbers are even better then people think.
Agile is really just convention to describe fast iteration, mostly applied to software and project management.Thank you so much.
I thought I had soaked up every scrap of information on Tesla available on the internet. I thought I couldn't get more bullish. Little did I know this channel was out there.
I watched a different Joe Justice video just now in which he said that Tesla runs the agile method on a 3 hour sprint cycle with 12 hour work shifts.
…
Paxton, sir, is not the wilderness. I’m not bored. I’m thinking about how much Tesla and SpaceX really are about manufacturing technology. We have, even enthusiasts, understated what that really means. Even Paxson now can have fast internet. Just marvel about that.The very next set of posts talking about California - in terms of COL, of beaches, of WHATEVER....
And I start non-stop about Paxson and life in the middle of the wilderness..
Are we bored yet?
So: stop.
This is a microcosm of how the street views TSLA. The street rolling in speculative gains is all ready too smart. So they look at TSLA, first as a 'kickstarter', then a cult, then a car company. All the while saying, well what is their revenue? What are their margins? Despite the reality that making durable goods, here cars and batteries is capital intensive. Your friend is way too smart to invest in TSLA. They will not even understand the QOQ and YOY production growth and that every widget being made is all ready sold. Because every auto manufacturer has YOY growth, right? (tongue in cheek)So somehow, tomorrow I’m going over to a billionaire’s house of a large internet media giant.
How long after introductions is it appropriate to advise them to put all their liquid assets into Tesla?
Agile is really just convention to describe fast iteration, mostly applied to software and project management.
In 2003 I worked with a large team that tried to use those concepts with a huge merger integration that required many very fast integrations of incompatible systems and processes. We were mostly ignorant and knew that. These concepts helped immeasurably to solve problems quickly and fix mistakes we made along the way. We managed to do that only because the client was desperate.![]()
What is Agile Software Development?
Agile gives organizations the ability to quickly create and respond to change in today's disruptive marketplace. Learn more at AgileAlliance.org.www.agilealliance.org
Now, seeing how Musk-world is doing this I am astonished. It takes massive confidence and humility to do this process called Agile. Nearly everyone fails doing it, precisely because they fear failure. From the beginning, before SpaceX, Elon Musk has had both confidence and humility.
The ‘holy grail’ of this might be to try to never make the same mistake twice. The corollary might be to avoid large scale deployment until you’ve solved the problems of small scale.
As we know from ‘Elon time’ the chief frustration is that you never know how much time and effort it takes to move from test to production.
The Joe Justice vídeo reminds me of how much I had forgotten. When that happens I suspect that is when I am remembering things I never knew.
Toyota, the disciples of Deming, masters of JIT and Lean, do not know that those earth shattering principles of 1980’s, are completely obsolete now.
Oh no, does that mean you'll be posting even more? I'm outta here.Morning folks! I'll just leave this here...
I'm "out of the office" this week, in sunny Romania - beautiful country
Oh contrare (sp?)Toyota, the disciples of Deming, masters of JIT and Lean, do not know that those earth shattering principles of 1980’s, are completely obsolete now.
I don't think that is exactly unsubstantiated. IDRA has an array of solutions that are cheaper than the Gigapresses. So do other suppliers....
It is my unsubstantiated hope that the 25K models can use IDRA 4000 series casting machines, IDRA may be able to make them faster, and they may have a faster cycle time.
Well I might not always agree with Jbcarioca but ..well said sir well said. It's really the only significant center of innovation in the last 30 years. In the world. Where innovation is the industry.Paxton, sir, is not the wilderness. I’m not bored. I’m thinking about how much Tesla and SpaceX really are about manufacturing technology. We have, even enthusiasts, understated what that really means. Even PaXsan now can have fast internet. Just marvel about that.
California, my birthplace, has done more to advance these technologies than has any other place. So COL and much else raises the question of how to preserve that spirit of relentless innovation.
Yes, Welcome to the club, here is a snapshot from my LinkedIn account:Welcome to the club.. After deleting my old LinkedIn account, I re-created a profile with “semi retired” as the job title.. just to pss off some of my nasty former colleagues![]()
There was some talk over the last couple of years that Pana was going to upgrade some of their Japanese lines to newer formfactors - not sure if this has eventuated, however if they were going to do it the time would have been while the S/X were being refreshed. If so, that may have reduced the number of lines producing 18650s. As a counter point, the 18650s energy density has also been increasing over time - so total # of GWh available is anyone's guess.Speaking of cells, based on the old 120k/yr S/X capacity, there should be over 5 GWh of unallocated 18650 cell production so far in 2021.
Tesla Energy is the least form factor constrained. If they made a 1865(0) module for Megapack (even for just internal V3 Supercharger load leveling), they could boost production and/or allocate more 2170 lines to 3/Y.
The Japanese plants handle cylindrical lithium-ion “18650” cells, used to power Tesla’s Model S and Model X vehicles, whereas the Nevada plant produces the newer, higher-energy density “2170” cells for the mass-market Model 3 sedan.
The Japanese production lines would only need minor changes to switch to 2170 cells from the 18650, said the person, who declined to be identified as the matter was private.
2021: test 4680 lines at "existing facilities":Panasonic plans to start a test line for 4680 cells in Japan in the business year beginning April 1, according to a person familiar with the matter. The two companies have not said if they plan to collaborate on production of the 4680 cells.
Panasonic will set up a prototype production line at existing facilities. The cost of the project is expected to run into the tens of millions of dollars.
I think it depends on wether they are complete or not: complete counts as produced, goes in inventory. Not complete (e.g. waiting for an unavailable part) counts as work in progress, and is not a “produced” car.Does Tesla count cars parked in lots waiting for a part as “produced” car in the quarter? If not then the numbers are even better then people think.
Yes, and most OEM's, including Tesla, will not place a product in 'finished goods' unless it is ready for delivery to a purchaser. that could include even software..I think it depends on wether they are complete or not: complete counts as produced, goes in inventory. Not complete (e.g. waiting for an unavailable part) counts as work in progress, and is not a “produced” car.
I wonder about warp and twist if they make a single casting with rails connecting front and back. If they use a pan, the battery module gets some suspension fringe on each end and a great lower pan to put heat into. I don't know what happens when it is bitterly cold outside?I don't think that is exactly unsubstantiated. IDRA has an array of solutions that are cheaper than the Gigapresses. So do other suppliers.
New models coming from Tesla (both China and Germany designs) probably will have lengths of less than 4.5 meters, (i.e. VW Golf/Peugeot 208/Dacia Sandero/VW T-ROC all EU best sellers).
We do not yet know if Tesla might decide to produce this class of vehicle with a single casting, or two of them. We do know (ok, I think we know) that they will make a single casting to include suspension components.
Maybe they'll use more Gigapresses if they want a single casting or two if they want two castings.
It may also be a decent guess that they'll use LFP battery chemistry, most likely CATL packs, which will be much more advanced by the time these vehicles enter production.
The challenge is to understand the innovation in the product and it's construction that will happen in the next two years before they arrive.
So, back to IDRA/LK. I believe that they are now preparing for the presses that will be deployed to support those new vehicles. FWIW, they are also working on larger presses too, as they have said. Those larger ones will probably support the now Models S and X when they arrive as well as Cybertruck and... something else.
I firmly believe we have just seen the beginning of materials innovation through collaboration between
LK-Idra, and aluminum providers. At the same time Tesla is innovating with stainless steel:
That 'highly austenitic' means very corrosion resistant and also use of lots of chromium and nickel. No question about that having come from Starship technology/![]()
That is not about aluminum castings but it may portent greater innovation in the steel parts fo new Tesla vehicles. The point of this post is that we seem to be forgetting just how consequential the Tesla materials innovation actually is, so the next vehicles will surprise us, rather as Cybertruck and Model Y castings already have done.
I think we may rest assure that the upcoming China and German designs will both be mind-blowing and will both ahem much lower construction costs than do any competitors two years hence.
Why? in mundane Munro terms: Tesla does not designed cars from existing parts bins.
Do you have any idea what they were smoking? Maybe Japan is a small island and everyone in the whole country can refuel at one hydrogen station?There is a lot of great engineering systems work from Deming and others. Toyota (and Japan inc automotive) was a result of a poorly poorly made bet on Hydrogen. For that same investment dollar they could have created Tesla and built battery factories. The funding into hydrogen and the resource allocation was just....mind blowing. Hydrogen fuel cells have exactly 0 market share. Amazing after the analog HDTV fiasco that Japan Inc did it again. Frankly just amazing.
Well the Japanese Rocket industry too, instead of creating blue origin or spacex they did a LM/Boeing useless clone. Sigh. Poor Japan.
How 'bout?Yes, thats still TBD, but the imagery provided on Bty Day(to my eye at least) suggests that the plan is for a cast battery box...
EDIT: here's the relevent slide from Bty Day so folks can judge for themselves:
View attachment 717310
Either way, it does not change the main point which is that 4680s packs are NOT coming to the Model S/X anytime soon.
Cheers!