-=buzz=-
Member
Cumulative investment since inception. That was all EV related....Well this is relevant. How is Tesla investing over $36 Billion and in what time frame?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cumulative investment since inception. That was all EV related....Well this is relevant. How is Tesla investing over $36 Billion and in what time frame?
Wow, I don't know how I feel about that. On one hand the EV spinoff will probably do well, but on the other hand good old Ford will likely fall by the wayside.
they’re trash cans, plain and simple. and it is frustrating. but better off paying them no mind.
Sad thing is that a lot of investors got misled by company and media and lost a lot of moneySo now that Nikola, Lordstown Motors, Rivian and Lucid have dropped out of the "Competition is coming" race, who else is left? Ford (Who cant decide if they are going to spin of the EV as separate business sources or not)? Or GM (who sold 26 EVs last quarter)? Fisker (again, LOL) ?
Can't we just give a free pass to green light everything does Tesla already and stop playing these games?
Ford is doing extraordinarily well with it all. I also would not say Rivian has dropped out. Rivian has an immature corp team (inexperienced) but are actually increasing production. Ford started from nowhere in EVs. 20 years ago they had some plans that were torpedoed by 2008, then focused on profits which are hard to come by. Then just released very first car and it was probably the best "first" EV of any manufacturer- the mache was a real car and has done very well (i follow Sandy's tear downs, thanks in advance - when you actually watch all of them you will see that despite the issues with the mache that some things were better than the MY). Yes the mache is better than the roadster- 15 years later but better. Ford recognizes the value is splitting. The Ford Lightening is going to be released at production levels before the CT. They invested in Rivian instead of Nikola (GM) or a sandbox deep enough for their heads (Toyota Honda). They don't have the pro ICE factions threatening to dismiss the CEO (VW) when he talks about change.So now that Nikola, Lordstown Motors, Rivian and Lucid have dropped out of the "Competition is coming" race, who else is left? Ford (Who cant decide if they are going to spin of the EV as separate business sources or not)? Or GM (who sold 26 EVs last quarter)? Fisker (again, LOL) ?
Can't we just give a free pass to green light everything does Tesla already and stop playing these games?
A threat to what? The ICE industry, I assume you mean.In summary, Ford seems to be a threat.
I'm in the camp who believes that most legacy auto will survive and transition while start ups will most likely fail. Biggest problems with start ups are the lack of service centers, the brutal warranty repair cost time frame they must survive, and ability to scale up manufacturing. Legacy auto looks to have no problem in these areas.Ford is doing extraordinarily well with it all. I also would not say Rivian has dropped out. Rivian has an immature corp team (inexperienced) but are actually increasing production. Ford started from nowhere in EVs. 20 years ago they had some plans that were torpedoed by 2008, then focused on profits which are hard to come by. Then just released very first car and it was probably the best "first" EV of any manufacturer- the mache was a real car and has done very well (i follow Sandy's tear downs, thanks in advance - when you actually watch all of them you will see that despite the issues with the mache that some things were better than the MY). Yes the mache is better than the roadster- 15 years later but better. Ford recognizes the value is splitting. The Ford Lightening is going to be released at production levels before the CT. They invested in Rivian instead of Nikola (GM) or a sandbox deep enough for their heads (Toyota Honda). They don't have the pro ICE factions threatening to dismiss the CEO (VW) when he talks about change.
Ford is doing everything needed to survive and we need that, the mission needs that. Sustainable transport will not happen if only Tesla succeeds. Good on the Ford team for being willing to tear it all apart to survive. GM is trying to survive via some Porter(wealth of nations strategy fame) like strategy of milking the cow to feed the stars (using ICE to fund EVs). Ford says ICE are holding EVs back and thus EV will grow faster without the leash. For an OEM this is brilliant and fast. By 2025- just 1-2 years after Tesla emerges from battery constraint mentioned on the last earnings call Ford will actually have their battery production facilities required to meet the current goals. They are building those, not outsourcing. Now then the question emerges as to sourcing or the supply chain. Ford has even started thinking about that. In summary, Ford seems to be a threat.
Maybe so maybe soA threat to what? The ICE industry, I assume you mean.
Intel CEO in SOTU ... is Mary next
Actually no...it is to prepare for the spin off. Ford CEO is saying that ICE is holding EV back. He's correct. The solution is obvious and painful. Spin apart. Keep pension obligations in old company, debts, mortgages, etc. New EV company is clean, well funded and Ford will have a stake. It is the first baby step to the spinoff. It is very complex with such an old company. The number of corporate entities could number in the hundreds or more, finance this and that and bonds all over the place and tax credits and tax rates and union agreements and on and on. They'll roll all the crap into old Ford and set the EV Ford free. It is painful and brilliant. I don't envy the bastards having to do that. I'm heading out to the forests right now. Tesla's set the standard, Ford is competing for second place like everyone else. Just they seem to be doing what it takes to win second place. Second place beats oblivion. Ford EV could emerge as a very successful company.It's not a spinoff. The idea is to report Ford's ICE and EV financials separately. That way it will look natural that ICE sales and profits are dropping while EV sales will be rising. Ford will say the EV profits will be great when they reach higher volumes. I can see this strategy delaying the inevitable conclusion that it's all over. The only way out of this eventuality is to recapitalize, innovate like crazy and run lean and mean. I just don't think Ford is up to it. They would need a lot of new talent promoted to positions above people that have a lot more seniority who would be tasked with changing the corporate culture and I just don't see that working. People don't like that kind of change.
I don't like to say things are impossible, but this is about as close as it gets.
That he was getting paid crazy money for almost driving Intel into oblivion and getting tax breaks like no tomorrow to build a factory complex?Wonder what he thought about all the corporate bashing?
Actually no...it is to prepare for the spin off. Ford CEO is saying that ICE is holding EV back. He's correct. The solution is obvious and painful. Spin apart. Keep pension obligations in old company, debts, mortgages, etc. New EV company is clean, well funded and Ford will have a stake. It is the first baby step to the spinoff. It is very complex with such an old company. The number of corporate entities could number in the hundreds or more, finance this and that and bonds all over the place and tax credits and tax rates and union agreements and on and on. They'll roll all the crap into old Ford and set the EV Ford free. It is painful and brilliant.
Those same "ford" executives still made a better first EV than Tesla. The door design on the mache is still better than the MY. Hubris is a dangerous path, it was not the only thing on the mache better than the MY.So these are fresh entities.....populated by the group of people least likely to succeed in EVs.
Even "the best" Ford execs are still Ford execs. Literally anyone else with large scale manufacturing experience would be more qualified because they're not tainted by a life in ICE.
Yes, Saudi Arabia should be quick to 100% solar+storage since it's literally the perfect setup for it. That will also be er happen.
As Supercharger distribution get denser, I agree with Elon. Today, I could still contend another 30% of range can be meaningful. Now if you’re trying to beat a McLaren 765LT in the ¼ mile, sure, optimize out to a lighter battery.
Those same "ford" executives still made a better first EV than Tesla. The door design on the mache is still better than the MY. Hubris is a dangerous path, it was not the only thing on the mache better than the MY.
The same "ford" executives have the brains to split the company and they are doing so without pissing off the unions and a major political party.