Mr Seba has been on the money (if not slightly pessimistic) since 2010.
I'm sure Seba has a very capable mind, but, the hour I put into watching a presentation he did in March of 2016, revealed that he played fast and loose with grossly misleading interpretations of public information* , resulting in a captivating but enormously off target claim that (word for word),
"by 2025 all new vehicles will be electric, all new buses, all new cars, all new tractors, all new vans will be electric, anything that moves on four wheels will be electric by 2025,... globally."
It was already obvious when I first saw that video (two years ago) that his prediction was actually further off than the most bearish forecasts even theoretically possible for EVs, as we cannot have negative EV market share. 2025 we are unlikely to pass 25% market share for EVs globally, and, when you back out China, unlikely to pass 15% market share. Outside of China, we'll probably be at 5-10%. Tony's call was 100%.
Maybe Tony has decided to go for steak over sizzle in his current round of commentary, I'm sure he's actually capable of serving up steak. That said, after spending an hour listening to the fabricated sizzle the last round in that March 2016 talk, I'm reluctant to invest time in watching more.
Anyone catch what he's walked back that 100% EV by 2025 assertion to? If it's a reasonable estimate, maybe I'll watch this new video.
*one quick example, in relation to global incumbents, he used a quick pace through his slide show to conflate announcements about "electrification" ambitions from the likes of Ford with nonexistent plans to actually produce EVs, to make his case for all EVs by 2025. I find it highly unlikely Seba himself did not know "electrification" is not a plan to make EVs. That is just one example of his playing fast & loose with facts. I think this was all done in favor of producing a catchy narrative, and future forecasting 'guru' aura about himself... the bigger the change forecasted, the bigger the potential 'mystique' fantasy around the would be 'guru').
Last edited: