Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I have 2 big frustrations with Tesla IR right now……

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with ending the wave. In fact it’s invited. But Tesla IR met with analysts multiple times over the past 1-2 months and not once mentioned to them that they’re ending the wave this quarter. Not a peep. Even though they gave many other updates on the status of the business and factories. It’s bizarre that they would not set expectations.

And further if you’re going to surprise analysts and wall st like this with a change in method about how you’re managing your deliveries/production, at least throw your investors a bone and state that you expect to deliver enough volume in Q4 to hit 50% growth for the year.
 
I have 2 big frustrations with Tesla IR right now……

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with ending the wave. In fact it’s invited. But Tesla IR met with analysts multiple times over the past 1-2 months and not once mentioned them that they’re ending the wave this quarter. Not a peep. Even though they gave many other updates on the status of the business and factories. It’s bizarre that they would not set expectations.

And further if you’re going to surprise analysts and wall st like this with a change in method about how you’re managing your deliveries/production, at least throw your investors a bone and state that you expect to deliver enough volume in Q4 to hit 50% growth for the year.
Knowing Tesla they just did what they saw to be the most advantageous at the time. Covid lock down in China and the Typhoon had executives made the decision fairly recently and most likely not pre-planned months ago. They saw this as the most optimal solution to a short term problem.
 
I have 2 big frustrations with Tesla IR right now…

And further if you’re going to surprise analysts and wall st like this with a change in method about how you’re managing your deliveries/production, at least throw your investors a bone and state that you expect to deliver enough volume in Q4 to hit 50% growth for the year.

Isn't that basically what the Reuters article citing the internal projection was for 495k 3&Y deliveries in Q4 did? That was probably leaked intentionally.
 
I hope I am wrong. but considering the volatility in the market lately and the negativity surrounding the Optimus Robot expect a huge downward move tomorrow (25%?)

Jusr a little tip, stay off Twitter fro a while. It is a depressing cesspool over there at the moment.
25%? That’s uh, a bit dramatic.
 
I hope I am wrong. but considering the volatility in the market lately and the negativity surrounding the Optimus Robot expect a huge downward move tomorrow (25%?)

Jusr a little tip, stay off Twitter fro a while. It is a depressing cesspool over there at the moment.
25% ?! I doubt it. Anyway, I sold some 230 puts on Friday … but not 300 calls. So, I guess a miss was to be expected ;)

Still, not expecting the SP to end below 230 on Friday.
 
I have 2 big frustrations with Tesla IR right now……

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with ending the wave. In fact it’s invited. But Tesla IR met with analysts multiple times over the past 1-2 months and not once mentioned to them that they’re ending the wave this quarter. Not a peep. Even though they gave many other updates on the status of the business and factories. It’s bizarre that they would not set expectations
That would be illegal as it was material non-public information until it was formally announced.
 
Despite missing some deliveries we hade hoped for, the factors above should have a measurable boost in the bottom line. Hopefully they'll begin to make some disclosures, so they can prudently be included in models.

Yeah, it's about $0.10 per share on the difference in inventory in transit: ($60K ASP, +18K Inv vs. Q2, w. 1.31B shares)


... but of course if ASP happened to go up $4K in Q3 v Q2, then it'd be a push. :p

Paging @The Accountant
 
That would be illegal as it was material non-public information until it was formally announced.
Huh? Tesla has literally given material information to analysts when they host groups of analysts with Martin, head of Tesla IR. They have material information about production rates at each factory. How on Earth you think there’s a difference between that and Tesla saying that they will be exporting from Shanghai in the final month of Sept to end the wave is beyond me
 
  • Like
Reactions: BornToFly
Where ? Certainly not in the dealership lots I drive by.

This is the historic average in recent years (well documented elsewhere). Tesla historically runs with days of inventory while everyone else runs with months. Q3 may be an anomaly, but if this is to be adjusted, it will happen by other auto majors decreasing their production (then blaming it on 'chips'). ;)

Cheers!
 
Huh? Tesla has literally given material information to analysts when they host groups of analysts with Martin, head of Tesla IR. They have material information about production rates at each factory. How on Earth you think there’s a difference between that and Tesla saying that they will be exporting from Shanghai in the final month of Sept to end the wave is beyond me
Yes - I think information given to analysts is considered public, since they will publish it.
 
Huh? Tesla has literally given material information to analysts when they host groups of analysts with Martin, head of Tesla IR. They have material information about production rates at each factory. How on Earth you think there’s a difference between that and Tesla saying that they will be exporting from Shanghai in the final month of Sept to end the wave is beyond me
I haven't heard of them sharing non public information... I've heard that they helped analysts understand information that has already been released.
 
So Much Talk of Exponential Growth, But So Few Logarithmic Charts

Exponential growth appears as linear growth on a chart if the vertical axis is converted to log scale. I think this should really be the standard way of presenting Tesla's growth because with this format it's a lot easier to see just how consistent the exponential growth has actually been and also easier to visually extrapolate.

We are now at the 10-year anniversary of Tesla first achieving a feeble resemblance of real volume production for the Model S in Q4 2012, giving the first real glimpse at a future in which EVs might be profitable and triggering TSLA's first bull rally in 2013. That's ~60% annual manufacturing volume growth for a whole decade.

"...it is about the cleanest exponential I've ever seen." - Elon Musk, Q4 2018 Tesla earnings call

1664746558339.png


This is almost on par with the 70% growth Ford achieved during the fastest portion of the Model T ramp.
1664749135748.png

The best indicator of future growth is the trend for the 3/Y family, which too has grown at a 60% compound annual rate since Q3 '18 (by which time the majority of Production Hell was finished; the growth rate for 3/Y is much higher if we include the initial three quarters). Most of this growth happened amidst global supply chain problems that substantially shrank production volume for all the other major car manufacturers.

1664750584536.png



Tesla Total Production
QuarterQuarterly ProductionTTM Production
Q4 20122,750
Q1 20134,900
Q2 20135,150
Q3 20135,50018,300
Q4 20136,58722,137
Q1 20147,53532422
Q2 20148,76341185
Q3 20147,78548970
Q4 201411,62735,710
Q1 201511,16039,335
Q2 201512,80743,379
Q3 201513,09148,685
Q4 201514,03751,095
Q1 201615,51055,445
Q2 201618,34560,983
Q3 201625,18573,077
Q4 201624,88283,922
Q1 201725,41893,830
Q2 201725,708101,193
Q3 201725,336101,344
Q4 201724,565101,027
Q1 201834,494110,103
Q2 201853,339137,734
Q3 201880,142192,540
Q4 201886,555254,530
Q1 201977,138297,174
Q2 201987,048330,883
Q3 201996,155346,896
Q4 2019104,891365,232
Q1 2020102,672390,766
Q2 202082,272385,990
Q3 2020135,036424,871
Q4 2020179,757499,737
Q1 2021180,338577,403
Q2 2021206,421701,552
Q3 2021237,823804,339
Q4 2021305,840930,422
Q1 2022305,4071,055,491
Q2 2022258,5801,107,650
Q3 2022365,9231,235,750
(Some of the "production" numbers from early quarters are actually the delivery numbers because Tesla didn't provide production data.)

Tesla 3/Y Production
Q1 20189,766
Q2 201828,578
Q3 201853,239
Q4 201861,394
Q1 201962,975
Q2 201972,531
Q3 201979,837
Q4 201986,958
Q1 202087,282
Q2 202075,946
Q3 2020128,044
Q4 2020163,660
Q1 2021180,338
Q2 2021204,081
Q3 2021228,882
Q4 2021292,731
Q1 2022291,189
Q2 2022242,169
Q3 2022345,988

Ford Model T Production
YearProduction
190910,666
191019,050
191134,858
191268,773
1913170,211
1914202,667
1915308,162
1916501,462
1917735,020
 
I have 2 big frustrations with Tesla IR right now……

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with ending the wave. In fact it’s invited. But Tesla IR met with analysts multiple times over the past 1-2 months and not once mentioned to them that they’re ending the wave this quarter. Not a peep. Even though they gave many other updates on the status of the business and factories. It’s bizarre that they would not set expectations.

And further if you’re going to surprise analysts and wall st like this with a change in method about how you’re managing your deliveries/production, at least throw your investors a bone and state that you expect to deliver enough volume in Q4 to hit 50% growth for the year.
You have NO idea whether Tesla IR mentioned it to analysts or not. They could have mentioned it and the analysts chose not to publicly repeat it, or even chose to ignore since we’ve all heard it before without it happening.
 
You have NO idea whether Tesla IR mentioned it to analysts or not. They could have mentioned it and the analysts chose not to publicly repeat it, or even chose to ignore since we’ve all heard it before without it happening.
I think we do have an idea whether Tesla IR mentioned it to analysts, because I'm pretty sure that would be a blatant violation of SEC regulations. I'm not a lawyer but this seems straightforward and it's obvious why such a rule would exist. In line with this expectation, Dave Lee recently spoke with Tesla IR and he said IR told him they can't say anything other than clarifying information that's already public.


Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) is a new issuer disclosure rule that addresses selective disclosure. The regulation provides that when an issuer, or person acting on its behalf, discloses material nonpublic information to certain enumerated persons (in general, securities market professionals and holders of the issuer's securities who may well trade on the basis of the information), it must make public disclosure of that information. The timing of the required public disclosure depends on whether the selective disclosure was intentional or non-intentional; for an intentional selective disclosure, the issuer must make public disclosure simultaneously; for a non-intentional disclosure, the issuer must make public disclosure promptly. Under the regulation, the required public disclosure may be made by filing or furnishing a Form 8-K, or by another method or combination of methods that is reasonably designed to effect broad, non-exclusionary distribution of the information to the public.

17 CFR 243 ("Regulation FD")

Whenever an issuer, or any person acting on its behalf, discloses any material nonpublic information regarding that issuer or its securities to any person described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the issuer shall make public disclosure of that information as provided in § 243.101(e)
 
Last edited:
Production is what really matters though- and that was up 20% in Q3 from Q1.

Even Q1 vs Q3 isn't indicative since half of Shanghai capacity was off-line for upgrades ~5 weeks in Q3.

A better comparison will be Jun 2022 vs. Sep 2022 production. We should get those CPCA numbers soon.

Cheers!
 
I know it’s the news media and all, but this is the lead story at CNN right now.

Who wants to buy some solar right now? Lots of people in Florida I bet:
I was wondering how solar panels were going to survive a cat-4 hurricane. Frankly I expected most to be destroyed-large, thin, relatively lightweight panels suspended either above ground on a frame or above a roof-in other words lots of big sails. Figured they'd be found a couple counties away. Really glad to see that I was wrong-especially as a TSLA investor. Let alone for the sake of the people dependent on them right now.