Krugerrand
Meow
Hypocrisy at its best.I can't imagine the judge would have made this decision without previous Twitter case involvement or X ownership being a threat to free speech.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hypocrisy at its best.I can't imagine the judge would have made this decision without previous Twitter case involvement or X ownership being a threat to free speech.
Been studying the Gen 1 vs 2 differences in the walk. It has changed.Gen 2 Optimus had a toe piece added, so not flat anymore.
It seems to have a more natural swing to it. This is much improved I think.
Did you get the disagree before or after you clarified you were joking? I’d like to have all the facts before I compartmentalize said person.I want a bot that can thread a needle with his toes.
Edit: to be clear I’m joking.
Yes, so unfortunate he saved the company from bankruptcy multiple times, that he risked every cent of his own money, that he took on a role he didn’t want to but did so because somebody had to, that he has been the glue that holds thousands of people together on a mission and path that not a single other established entity dared to attempt or wanted to, that he attracted brilliant minds from around the world -Unfortunately it seems like Elon will decide the response and the board will go along with it which is what the judge used to void the package.
Ooh, I think there are a number of people who view themselves as entitled shareholders that are really hoping there’s no state of the union speech. Of course, I’m with you. I love a good fireworks show.If this means Elon won't give a state of the nation talk then I'm going to get really mad at this judge!
Looks like it's not only Elon that knows to play 4D chessNo it wouldn't. I don't think the shareholders want TSLA removed from the S&P500.
Even if it was possible to add another class of shares, doing so would remove TSLA from the S&P500, since they changed the rules to not allow multiple classes of shares. (They grandfathered in the companies that already had multiple classes before they changed the rules.)
If anything the SP should be moving up if the dilution from the shares from Elon package are no longer on the table. However given there is likely to be an appeal and/or a new package it's still all up in the air.I'm shocked that TSLA is moving with the market today instead of heading sharply lower.
So much for the old adage that the market hates uncertainty.
I just don't understand why the board being friends/lovers/comrades/shipmates/countrymen/neighbors/brothers/spouses/whatever even matters. The shareholders voted to approve it. Nothing else should matter. If shareholders felt they weren't getting a good deal out of it, they would have voted against it.He didn't overrule it,the Judge ruled that the vote was based on a plan from an impartial board. I would be happy to give Elon the package but the lawyers/board at Tesla dropped the ball here letting a court case like this possible.
I wish people who think the judge did right didn’t talk to the rest of us like we didn’t read the judgement before coming to our own conclusions.I wish people would read the ruling before posting, it's nothing to do with the amount awarded or the details of the targets, it's boils down to the board not being independent of Elon. Whether this is the case or not is down to the Judge's evaluation of the evidence. There is no corruption, not left wing plot by Biden etc.
We are so surprised.
NewsflashYes, people in business cannot be friendly, like one another, have sat down to a meal and campfire talked, nor have worked cooperatively and fairly in the past, present or future for the benefit of ALL because those actions are a clear sign they are swindling ‘somebody’. (That’s sarcasm, Matias)
Wall Street is not stupid. $55B "share buyback" opportunity will turn Tesla's balance sheet from a mere fortress into the US Navy.I'm shocked that TSLA is moving with the market today instead of heading sharply lower.
So much for the old adage that the market hates uncertainty.
Before. So I added a few smileys and that note as apparently it wasn't clear that I was joking .Did you get the disagree before or after you clarified you were joking? I’d like to have all the facts before I compartmentalize said person.
I just don't understand why the board being friends/lovers/comrades/shipmates/countrymen/neighbors/brothers/spouses/whatever even matters. The shareholders voted to approve it. Nothing else should matter. If shareholders felt they weren't getting a good deal out of it, they would have voted against it.
I’m feeling disenfranchised by this ruling. A judge has ruled that my votes don’t count. I took that vote very seriously (more seriously than most political elections I’ve voted in) and to have a judge dismiss it as she has leaves me feeling stripped of something important. It’s hard to put in words but this seems so fundamentally wrong to me.
There is no share buyback opportunity. 304M of share issuance is currently off the table, that's it. Shares at large didn't and won't decrease.Wall Street is not stupid. $55B "share buyback" opportunity will turn Tesla's balance sheet from a mere fortress into the US Navy.
I never said the Judge was right, clearly some people didn't really understand what the decision was about, it important to understand it so that it can be resolved. Sorry if my tone was off from the text not intentional.I wish people who think the judge did right didn’t talk to the rest of us like we didn’t read the judgement before coming to our own conclusions.
Yes, I understand the judge's reasoning for the decision. But if it is indeed a violation of the law, the law doesn't make sense. Why does it matter how the negotiations proceeded? Shareholders didn't vote on the negotations, we voted on the END RESULT of the negotiation. How you get from A to B doesn't matter if everyone democratically voted on B.From what I read the problem was which board members did the negations from Tesla's side vs Elon on the comp package. If said person/people were seen to be mates then it could be seen as not a proper negotiation. I would have voted for the package also (can't vote as my shares are in UK) it's not about if the package was fair or not or whether the share holders approved it, but about how it was negotiated and by whom. Im not saying the Judge was correct here just explaining the decision.