Mars ☰mperor
Member
You have to connect to your brokers.I'd be interested to know how SAY "verifies" shares.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have to connect to your brokers.I'd be interested to know how SAY "verifies" shares.
Heavy research has been done.Not that I personally know the answer, but I think this is one we could answer ourselves with a little investigation.
Heavy research has been done.
Both Google and local Chinese search engine.
No definitive answer found.
Good luck with your “investigation”
The source is Canadian, but I don’t think that matters: Import Regulations in China
From reading that, it sounds like their tariffs apply only to actual imported goods, not those manufactured in China. It’s possible there are some other taxes involved, but the tariffs everyone refers to isn’t one of them.
This is supported, by the way, by additional reporting that most US auto manufacturers weren’t really impacted much by the tariffs since most of their cars are manufactured there.
No joke. But that is to take care of a real cat - not a pussy cat.Better have eyes in the back of your head.
Where are you getting gross margins on the 75D? I have trouble believing that the margins on the 75D are that high. There's only 25kWh difference of cells between a 75D and a 100D ($~4-5k), but the difference in price was a lot more than $4-5k, and that difference was pure profit. I have trouble believing that 75D margins were even double digits.
"Downgrading" people to a P3D probably greatly increases margins. It also leaves the remaining S/X line as very high margin.
Were You Laid Off by Tesla? So Was I.I am one of 3,000 laid off by Tesla on January 18th. One of approximately 7,000 layoffs in the last 9 months.
Tesla has been silent because it’s a so obvious question and nobody has expected it to be asked.Fact of the matter is, I don’t have a clear answer on this, you did not show a conclusive one either. One explanation is the area where Gigafactory Shanghai is located in has not been categorized as “Free Trade Zone”.
Hope someone can prove me wrong, but officially Tesla has been silent on this front.
Of course I hope they can bypass tariffs and get the soon to wane out local subsidies, both great for my Model 3 and Y and every investor.
In 1977 a Kodak engineer invented the digital camera. He was ordered not to tell anyone about it. In 1996 General Motors began producing electric cars. A few years later it recalled the cars or terminated their leases and destroyed them all. In both cases the companies did not want to cannibalize their core businesses. Both manufacturing behemoths eventually went bankrupt, although the government bailed out General Motors (at least for now.)
Here's a recently produced video about Kodak's road to ruin. The ICE automakers may have set themselves up for similar fates.
Tesla has been silent because it’s a so obvious question and nobody has expected it to be asked.
Definitely they’re not going to be charged with the auto tariff.
China have different tariff rate for auto and auto parts. Once you start to do final assemble in China, you pay tariff on what ever parts you import and the assembled cars are not subject to tariffs.
Tariff rate varies for different auto parts but overall they are much much lower than assembled auto. More in line with other commodity.
If you import assembled auto sans wheels, it would not be as easy to categorize them as parts as it used to be, but painted body or unmarried drivetrain would be easy to pass as parts. Also, parts origins from China don’t need to be imported which can be a large portion if you want to.
335mi x 1.26 = 422mi rangeModel 3 vs model S battery cell disassembly and internals (tesla 2170 vs 18650)
Around 52:00:
Battery cell energy density: from 240 to 247 Wh/kg (18650, 2170), 3% increase
pack level energy density: from 126.7 to 159.5, Wh/kg, 25.9% increase
Disappointing to see that the cell level energy density only saw little improvement so no big improvement in chemistry. But the pack level energy density improvement is impressive, possibly due to less cells being used and less dead weight in the structure and packing material?
When model s / x switch to 2170 we may see ~26% increase in range if Tesla keep vehicle weight constant. Alternatively Tesla could keep battery capacity constant reducing weight but I have no idea how much efficiency gain this translates to.
So last Friday Tesla issued a statement where they made it pretty clear that they cut the 75D to better differentiate the Model 3 and the Model S/X - i.e. probably not to add a new battery pack. Cutting production in half results from that, at least in the short term: the 75D was more than half of the demand.
But there's still a few conflicting things here, in particular Elon said the following:
This has not happened yet - there's still "100D" and "P100D" models. Also, if the only option was the 100 kWh packs then naming them based on range would be somewhat pointless, right?
But yes, I agree that it looks more and more probable that they are cutting Model S/X production by 50%, to the high trim versions, instead of running it at peak 18,650 cell supply capacity.
This might also give them more factory floor space in Fremont, and maybe one of the chassis lines could be repurposed to make the Model Y chassis? I'm not sure there's much point to do that though.
Another possibility is that they think that HW3 and possible FSD introduction in early April will increase the value of the high end Model S/X as well - which would spur sales and upgrades.
Okay, I'm anxious now. Is this you?Better have eyes in the back of your head.