anthonyj
Stonks
Model 3 Production at ATH according to Bloomberg
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What you described is exactly the reason companies like Waymo/Uber,etc. have their current valuation. Future estimations for that market are in the trillions.
TSLA is purposefully stripped from such valuation.
There's three other forces as well I believe:
Not even Volkswagen appears to have broken this kind of lock-in: even the ID is going to use prismatic cells I believe.
- Leading battery pack producers like LG Chem are pushing prismatic/pouch cells because it creates a kind of vendor lock-in: the cells typically have much higher capacity, so any module designed to them will unlikely to be able to make use of competing vendor's cells. Cylindrical cells on the other hand allow more interchangeability, for example Tesla's Australia battery project was using Samsung cells.
- Leading car OEMs are buying whatever is available in volume - and that's basically just LG Chem. Everything else takes years to build: a cylindrical cell factory takes 2-3 years to build, from scratch. So once they have started with prismatic cells, it's more probable that their next generation of EVs is using similar cells.
- Car OEMs also prefer their outsourced suppliers to be tied to their EV architecture, so that they cannot go and sell to other carmakers overly easily.
I also agree with @KarenRei about moving to 2170 being the last thing Tesla would choose to do. In addition to possible reasons she mentioned, a few more reasons I can think of.
- 18650 is not fundamentally worse than 2170; changing cells of a battery pack for such an incremental improvement doesn't make sense.
- 18650 is made in Japan at separate factories, totaling 8GWh. Why concentrate and invest more money into GF1 to do the same thing?
- if Panasonic planned to move to 2170 in Japan, that would mean they have to amortize the equipment completely and invest in a whole new set of assets. Would they do that?
- if Panasonic decided to move production of 2170 to Nevada, what do they do with employees in Japan? Remember they can't fire a single employee in Japanese law.
I think Jaguar have ordered 5Gwh/year 2170s from Samsung for 2020+. Not clear who is making the battery pack though or whether the design is finished.Jaguar has figured it out, as they are going to the 2170.
18650 and 2170 cells are the only reasonable sized non-locked in places I know of in the battery market, and who would even consider building a car using 18650s?
It seems Tesla is the only one using NCA chemistry for the cell, and might therefore need better protection for the cells, with NCA being less stable. The result being a superior package.Not even Volkswagen appears to have broken this kind of lock-in: even the ID is going to use prismatic cells I believe.
Yeah.
As a recap, here's all the Elon quotes I could find where he talks about Tesla's role in the 'shared economy':
2017/Q4 ER call:But it's not included in most Wall Street analysts' Tesla valuation, because that would mess up all the bankwuptcy, equity raise, $250 price target narratives, right?
Elon Musk:
"There's also as I mentioned prior things that we expect operate at kind of a shared autonomy fleet where Tesla's kind of like a combination of Uber or Lyft and Airbnb, I guess, like where you can opt to have your car enter a shared fleet or not, and then Tesla can also operate its own fleet in places where there's not enough people sharing their vehicles. So that's a pretty significant opportunity."
![]()
So last Friday Tesla issued a statement where they made it pretty clear that they cut the 75D to better differentiate the Model 3 and the Model S/X -
If Tesla does manage to produce and ship 3k 3s to Europe every week and the first ship arrives in 2 weeks thats about 18k 3s will arrive in Q1 which looking at the orders should be completely and easily absorbed.
But it's not included in most Wall Street analysts' Tesla valuation, because that would mess up all the bankwuptcy, equity raise, $250 price target narratives, right?![]()
If GRIP is the German wannabe Top Gear, they probably also have scripted results, so the verdict is no surprise.Germany's #1 car influencer - and Tesla sympathizer - "JP" trashed the Model3 on the telly ("GRIP", Germany's wannabe Top Gear):
Ugh.
- Borrowed a M3 LR (non-P) to drive from LA to Las Vegas.
- Likes the quality and finish of the interior.
- Impressed by range, charging speed and acceleration.
- Didn't dig the look of it ("transport capsule").
- Indifferent about AP.
- (Off-commentary) "Volume of the trunk is pathetic".
- Couldn't manage to open the frunk.
- Disliked and spread fake-news about the breaking. You know what I'm talking about.
- "Not revolutionary." / "Failed."
He has quite a following and is a true thought-leader among the young car enthusiasts in Germany. Not good.
Edit: Lots of criticism towards JP and GRIP in the comments.
But it's not included in most Wall Street analysts' Tesla valuation, because that would mess up all the bankwuptcy, equity raise, $250 price target narratives, right?![]()
Well, that's the thing.. I totally want to believe the awesome German demand and all the arguments presented are very convincing. But at 18k deliveries in Q1 and 10k of them going to Germany, how could I still be able to order the car anywhere in Europe and get promised a March delivery? Are we missing some ships?
True, but not every Tesla owner is a homeowner with roof appropriate for rooftop solar.
Premarket is mostly BS. Thursday we gapped down to 279 then rocketedPre-market not looking too peachy yet. What is it going to be today?
Pre-market not looking too peachy yet. What is it going to be today?
NVDA cutting earnings forecast - ouch.
Could that be because TESLA is switching to HW3 and won't be paying much to NVDA ?