These are good points, but being a Tesla vehicle makes the customer value proposition fundamentally different. So you got a product that has all of the tech and styling of a Tesla, it is a Tesla and uses all of Tesla's sales, service and charging channels, it is built just as well if not better than in Fremont, and the price is right. I think this is a compelling value proposition. The rest of where the vehicle was designed and built is just a branding or image kind of issue. It plays on nationalistic perceptions that actually have little to do with the product itself.
As a thought experiment, suppose Tesla were to manufacture technically equivalent Model X in US, Germany and China. While badging may indicate country of origin, the product is otherwise identical. So which one would you buy? Depending on where you live, transport costs, exchange rates and so, one place of origin may be lower cost and have quicker delivery than the others. Would you be willing to pay a premium or wait longer to receive the product from the country of your choice? Some people would. But what is that really based on? It's not the product, not the local channels that you access. More likely it's just some nationalistic stereotype that floats around in your head for which you are willing to pay a premium. If this bias is strong enough, Tesla will exploit it to extract a higher profit margin.
Yes, those nationalistic biases do exist, but do they rise to the level that Tesla can profit from them. As long as Teala is most supply constrained, logistically challenged, and competing mostly with unexciting ICE vehicles, I don't think playing to nationalistic biases is anywhere on the list of priorities for Tesla. Customers will want the best Tesla they can afford with minimal delay.
