That is by Claudia Assis who is nowhere to be found unless there is Tesla FUD to be written (Okay, there was one article she penned that didn't have a single negative, but that was written after quite a drought brought on by successive all time highs).
This one is full of the FUD that she loves best. Just one example:
"has been called" is exactly the sort of unsourced vague statement beloved by FUDsters everywhere.
Tesla has, of course, "pinned a lot of its expansion plans on the Chinese market and the performance of its Shanghai factory." Just like it has also pinned a lot of its expansion plans on the German market and the performance of its Brandenburg factory (which hasn't even broken ground yet!)
And then we get a leap of faith such as is constantly taken by shorts and their enablers in the press. In this case that S&P inclusion is now in doubt because of COVID-19. Considering that the factory was barely affected by outbreak leaves that as a head scratcher, but that isn't unusual when it comes to the press and Tesla.
Sigh. I really
had hoped that she was just negative on Tesla but had been brought around by the obviously and unmistakably positive outlook. Honestly, even if I were a paid shill I'd be embarrassed to have my name attached that article. I'd at least have found a way to make the leap of faith less obvious (not that I'm about to give her kind any pointers by doing so here).