You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, close at $701 today?![]()
How much for refurbished?I am setting up a lemonade style stand in front of my house. Toilet paper $.25 per square!
Even if oil were like $0/barrel, ICE vehicles would not be fuel-price competitive with EVs. Gas would still be ~$1.50/gallon just from distribution/refining/etc.
How long is it going to take the regular press to figure out that if you are not building a battery factory, you are not a serious contender in the world BEV market.
Only Volkswagen and Tesla are doing this right now, am I correct?
Everyone else is buying batteries from some other vendor, and is therefore not developing any tech of its own.
Compare with the ICE business... there may be suppliers for seats, brakes and other parts, but for the most part, companies develop and build their own engines. This is regarded as the special sauce that differentiates the vehicles in each brand.
Companies that buy batteries from LG Chem and so on, will find it impossible to gain a costs or performance edge.
Further, General Motors is growing the South Korean battery industry!!! Doesn't anyone in the U.S. press have a problem with that? It's a great time to be a South Korean battery manufacturer.
Meanwhile, Tesla is manufacturing and assembling as vertically and as completely as they reasonably can. (Sumitomo 18650's for S+X excepted) This will inevitably add long term strength to the company and will be the "moat." Analysts who think the legacy manufacturers have a "moat of experience" seem to be glossing over the fact that Tesla has two massive factories dedicated to building batteries, but the rest of the auto industry has none.
Barron's - 7 minutes ago: This Is What Consumers Think of Tesla’s Cybertruck and Model Y. It’s Good News.
Excerpt:
“The survey shows 28% of global respondents would likely consider buying Model Y,” wrote UBS analyst Patrick Hummel in a Friday research report. “Which compares to 26% interested in Model 3 back in 2018.”
Hummel is the one responsible for the consumer survey. Almost 10,000 people in six countries were asked about battery-only powered cars.
Interest in China, the world’s largest market for new cars, is even higher. There, 65% of survey respondents said they would consider buying a Model Y. That’s another bit of good news for Tesla.
“18% of U.S. survey respondents would likely consider buying Cybertruck,” said Hummel in his report. “In the head-to-head comparison, the Chevy Silverado and the F-150 would still be preferred over Cybertruck...but Cybertruck is ahead of the RAM 1500.”
Economic Impact of the Coronavirus
I can't quantify this but it's certain many sectors are getting an economic boom with this virus. Consumer Staples represent 70% of GDP. You think those toilet paper factories aren't humming at the moment? Costco has to replenish all that inventory that just flew off their shelves. In fact, instead of the normal re-order quantity, I am sure they will double their order amounts.
I have a friend who has a small business in snacks, his orders in the past 3 weeks have tripled! Wholesalers have told him that retailers are putting in orders for 6 weeks of inventory rather than the normal two weeks. This is causing the wholesaler to stock up and my friend (the manufacturer) has increased his orders to his suppliers...and then the supplier increases their orders to their suppliers and so on and so on. I spoke to colleagues at a Pharma company I used to work with....yep you guessed it, they have enacted their Coronavirus preparedness plans and are working overtime on all manufacturing lines to increase inventory levels. I called another colleague at a Technology Hardware company and they are doing the same.
Overall, I think the impact is still a net negative but for all the industries impacted negatively (travel, entertainment, restaurants,etc), there are many industries in the consumer staples category doing very well.
Let's hope the drag on the economy won't be damaging.
View attachment 518883
What has gotten over looked is the impact on Ford's dealers and ICE dealers in general. Very little good analysis is being done to look 5-10 years in the future to project what the overall industry will look like. The only things you hear from analysts relate to the car makers. Why they don't talk about dealers is surprising but they won't get clicks with those headlines. And not just car makers and dealers but auto part suppliers and the repair industry in general. It's going to be messy not unlike what Amazon has done to the retail industry. Fortunately, Tesla's business model puts it in a good position to weather the industries upheaval that everyone on the forum knows is coming but the average person on the street has no idea about. Another reason to hold onto your Tesla investment.I want GM to succeed for the benefit of humanity, but first I want to see them squirm with frustration. Maybe see them downsize and no gov't bail out before they put that EV halo on their name.
GM said they plan to build 1M EVs annually by 2025. To support that they are building out 30GWh of battery production capacity. That's 30 kWh per car. They also said their EVs will do 400 miles of EPA range. So options are:GM is building a cell factory in Lordstown OH that is a 50/50 joint venture with LG Chem that will break ground this year and is expected to be ramped up to 30+ GWh by 2025 and contains a proprietary Chemistry to GM according to GM CEO Barra.
Interestingly, the survey was conducted by UBS analyst Patrick Hummel. He has always had a Sell rating on TSLA going back to October 2018. His current TSLA price target is $410. Perhaps an upgrade of TSLA will spark a lift of his meager TipRanks ranking: https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/patrick-hummel
I'll take #2 with a side order of #3.GM said they plan to build 1M EVs annually by 2025. To support that they are building out 30GWh of battery production capacity. That's 30 kWh per car. They also said their EVs will do 400 miles of EPA range. So options are:
- GM is bending the laws of physics and will be able to produce 1M EVs per year with 400 miles of range with only 1/3 of what Tesla needs to achieve that (latest Model s with 100 kWh battery). Good for them, Nobel prize is secured.
- GM is pulling the usual "electrified" stunt, so most of these 1M cars will be hybrids with 10-15 kWh batteries and some percentage will be EVs of which an even smaller percentage will have 100 kWh+ packs and can actually do 400 miles.
- GM will be sourcing batteries from multiple sources, not just Ohio.
- This was a marketing event with 10% steak, 90% sizzle and a lot of smoke over the all important details. Things like actual range, price, production dates and numbers of the 10 models they were talking about.
I can't wait for the day when the analysts realize this.CNBC said Tesla is a non factor now that oil is so low lol this was in response to model y and cybertruck showing strong demand.
edit: the obvious issue with that statement is the CNBC analyst thinks Tesla owners are sacrificing by driving an electric car when in reality we are just driving the best car you can buy. No sacrifice, gas has very little to do with it once you own one
Even if oil were like $0/barrel, ICE vehicles would not be fuel-price competitive with EVs. Gas would still be ~$1.50/gallon just from distribution/refining/etc.
I am setting up a lemonade style stand in front of my house. Toilet paper $.25 per square!
GM is building a cell factory in Lordstown OH that is a 50/50 joint venture with LG Chem that will break ground this year and is expected to be ramped up to 30+ GWh by 2025 and contains a proprietary Chemistry to GM according to GM CEO Barra.
2025 to hit 30 GWh? Here's the problem:
Even if they hit their announced target, that's almost 6 frickin' years...they will be bankrupt before they get to full ramp!