secondstage
Member
No, automotive revenue from NVDA is less then 10%. Because the crypto hype is over the graphic card sale price decreased. This hurtsCould that be because TESLA is switching to HW3 and won't be paying much to NVDA ?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, automotive revenue from NVDA is less then 10%. Because the crypto hype is over the graphic card sale price decreased. This hurtsCould that be because TESLA is switching to HW3 and won't be paying much to NVDA ?
No,OEMs favor pouch cells because they are run by mechanical engineers.
Mechanical engineers have a bias toward the least number of parts.
They see 250 pouch cells or 7000 cylinder cells, they will choose the 250 part option.
Lowering the number of parts in a car has been key to cost reductions.
Well, that's the thing.. I totally want to believe the awesome German demand and all the arguments presented are very convincing. But at 18k deliveries in Q1 and 10k of them going to Germany, how could I still be able to order the car anywhere in Europe and get promised a March delivery? Are we missing some ships?
One thing I don't often see discussed on self driving cars is the enormous value of a 1-2 year first mover advantage.
The first 1-3 million self driving cars on the road are still going to be massively outnumbered by the 30 million+ global taxi fleet. This means there is no incentive to charge less than Uber/Lyft per mile until the global taxi fleet is saturated with self driving cars and competition begins to drive the cost of cars down. In fact many customers would be willing to pay a premium over Uber/Lyft for the novelty, increased safety, and premium Tesla passenger experience.
If Tesla switches on 1 million self driving cars and is first to market, each of those cars could potentially generate over $200k cash flow per year (after electricity, service, cleaning costs etc) until the market starts to get saturated with 3 million+ self driving cars. Even when other companies deliver self driving technology, it is going to take a long time to get a global fleet of enough numbers to put the entire global taxi industry out of business. Almost all Tesla owners will be persuaded to send their $40-60k cars to work for Tesla's fleet for $30-50k annual profit. It doesn't make business sense for Tesla to give its customers a larger share of the profit than it needs to to persuade everyone to send their cars to work. So I can see Tesla keeping $150k cash flow per car and its 1 million self driving car fleet making Tesla $150bn cash flow in year one.
China Gigafactory building site flyover. That's at least the third Tesla related video from this channel with only 126 subscriptions... Subscribed!
Looks ugly for the market in general this morning.
It’s not all or nothing. Not an on or off toggle. It will be a gradual transition. Even when achieved there will be continued improvements so assigning 10 yr deadline not realistic.I have FSD on my Model 3. Purchased it happily. I know at some point it will be worth it. My car still will not drive itself.
Kind of tired of everyone talking about it honestly.
I am now of the opinion that autonomous driving is at least ten years away. Let us hope that does not become a nuclear fusion like target, which has been twenty years away since 1950.
I doubt any major company is 5+ years ahead of any other with regards to solid state.
Battery scientist move around and talk to each other. No one is that far ahead without word leaking out.
Toyota said in 2018 they are about 5 years away from commercialization of solid state batteries.If they give an update this year I am willing to bet they say they will likely start production in 2024. And next year in 2025.
Tesla's roof is not only not offered in my area, but is also prohibitively expensive. In the meantime, my utility is trying to convince homeowners to allow them to install solar for the utility's profit. It of course isn't quite couched in those terms, but the only thing they are really offering is no up front cost for solar and a slight rate decrease. I believe they are trying to get ahead of people becoming fairly independent from the utility.Me - data point of 1 - for example: I have a flat roof. No offer from TE for that
Like almost every earnings report lots of volatility and large drops pre report. Would I trade on that—no but will set up to buy shares if it drops enough. Don’t bother asking me what is enough. Short term options too expensive for my tastes and even with some reports I considered great (like 2018 q3) market manipulation can be unpredictableLooks ugly for the market in general this morning.
Wait isn't that Faraday's MO?See! Potemkin Village!!! Moving dirt and building not a crop circles, planting flags, dropping down some empty cardboard boxes with fake window and door openings, guys in dark uniforms standing around kicking at dirt. Tesla spending fake Chinese money from their made up Chinese bank loan on nothing more than theatrics moving at a snails pace. Double down amigos!
From what I remember the 3k were FTEs and not contractors.
I can already see the headlines after ER on Wednesday :
" Tesla profits fall by X% on Q4" ...
A lot of people are waiting for $250 to jump back in. I don’t see it happening but who knowsI cant believe that investors are so dumb. The most innovative car company on earth, after numerous, constant predictions that they would go bankrupt, is certain to report its second consecutive quarterly profit THIS WEEK, and people are... *selling*.
Its amazing how dumb the market can be.
I'm with you on the "indefinite point in the future" part, but I'm not tired of discussions about it (other than flogging of dead horses).I have FSD on my Model 3. Purchased it happily. I know at some point it will be worth it. My car still will not drive itself.
Kind of tired of everyone talking about it honestly.
I am now of the opinion that autonomous driving is at least ten years away. Let us hope that does not become a nuclear fusion like target, which has been twenty years away since 1950.
Wait isn't that Faraday's MO?
Dan