willw64
Member
Just last week one of the clowns said units were going to be down around 30%, and he said it like it was the gospel.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A 647.5 mile pack, in order to keep up with LG's unbelievable rate of innovation.Sure, and Tesla has a 500 mile range pack ready to go, as soon as the cells are good enough.
Those 10.1M shares were initiated short trades. Some of them were covered in one second, some in one minute, some in one hour, etc. Some, many days from now, if ever. Most on these shorts were initiated to manipulate the share price. All of this has very little to do with reported short interest. Happens every day.Short data pondering.
For the last 5 trading days volumebot has reported 60% or more of the trades involved short sales. That would be some 10.1 million shares. But the sept 13th shows a short interest of 39 million shares. I am thinking there is a lot of short term short positions perhaps clossing out just before the required reporting day? Possibly the same day or within days of when they were opened?
TSLAQ FUD was alive and will on CNBC this afternoon. I do think Musk has been his own worst enemy at times, but what they were saying today was borderline if not slanderous.
Those 10.1M shares were initiated short trades. Some of them were covered in one second, some in one minute, some in one hour, etc. Some, many days from now, if ever. Most on these shorts were initiated to manipulate the share price. All of this has very little to do with reported short interest. Happens every day.
Sure, and Tesla has a 500 mile range pack ready to go, as soon as the cells are good enough.
With regards to the report about Tesla's starting mass production in GF3 in mid October:
Production milestone for Tesla in Lingang
This is sooner than I thought.
Anyone care to speculate on how many M3s will be produced by EOY? If GF3 can reach 3k/week by December, an extra 10-15k vehicles could put Tesla near the mid-range of their guidance with nice margins too. Being in Shanghai, Tesla delivery times shouldn't be long.
Or has someone already covered this? The day I don't read the forums much, TSLA goes crazy.
Because the charge acceptance rate of the cell chemistry has always been the limitation of fast charging and Porsche advertising charge speeds outside of the capability of energy dense EV cells has always been ridiculous, no matter what voltage they run at. Some of us have been pointing that out since the moment they started touting their 800V pack and the supposed "advantages" it provided.munro and associates or similar will confirm the specs soon enough.
800v architecture, onboard charger and stuff.
I don't know why lame hyperbolic attacks on Tesla seemingly justify lame hyperbolic attacks on Taycan for some people.
I don't know what an OEM is supposed to do when a supplier promises specs they can't deliver on time.
They didn't clean the suction cup marks from the glass? Service really is going down the tubes. This is going to be in the news tomorrow for sure!My brother picked up his M3P today it’s so factory fresh. It still has the suction cup marks on the windshield from the factory assembly robot lol. September 2019 build date. East coast. Amazing. The middle storage compartment has way better build quality than previous Model 3’s. Has the new annoying pedestrian warning speaker too
View attachment 459387 View attachment 459388
Looks like the release of v10 had a hiccup today. Already releasing 10.1 and it has 10x more installs on Tesla Fi than 10 in roughly 30 minutes after it was first identified.
TeslaFi (@teslafi)
9/26/19, 7:10 PM
Software version 2019.32.10.1 0874034 was just detected on a Tesla Model Model 3 Standard Range Plus with Autopilot 2.5 hardware in Connecticut United States. The highest previous version was 2019.32.10 8f5cdff.
Edit:
Download started on my 3 minutes after I posted this.
Because the charge acceptance rate of the cell chemistry has always been the limitation of fast charging and Porsche advertising charge speeds outside of the capability of energy dense EV cells has always been ridiculous, no matter what voltage they run at. Some of us have been pointing that out since the moment they started touting their 800V pack and the supposed "advantages" it provided.
I don't know what an OEM is supposed to do when a supplier promises specs they can't deliver on time.
Dude, literally one of the first 17 or so? I keep writing here thinking I'm next. If not tonight, I'll be checking before my first pssst (onomatopoeia) in the morning.
Sure, that was my point. What Porsche announced is something they could not deliver at launch, which is what I expected all along. If Tesla had announced a 500 mile pack but it came up well short of that everyone would have been all over them, and rightly so.LG Chem will manufacture better cells in the future.