UnknownSoldier
Unknown Member
This is unfortunate because the name is Model 3, or just 3 for short. It is not, and has never been, 'M3'.Many TMCers refer to Model 3 as M3.
BMW has held the trademark for 'M3' since 1986.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is unfortunate because the name is Model 3, or just 3 for short. It is not, and has never been, 'M3'.Many TMCers refer to Model 3 as M3.
Look bubba, you are knockin heads with some full on lazy asses when it comes to trying to get them to write with regards to standard norms to improve understanding.This is unfortunate because the name is Model 3, or just 3 for short. It is not, and has never been, 'M3'.
BMW has held the trademark for 'M3' since 1986.
This is unfortunate because the name is Model 3, or just 3 for short. It is not, and has never been, 'M3'.
BMW has held the trademark for 'M3' since 1986.
This is unfortunate because the name is Model 3, or just 3 for short. It is not, and has never been, 'M3'.
BMW has held the trademark for 'M3' since 1986.
Many TMCers refer to Model 3 as M3.
Exactly because that video is sloppy, I don’t expect them to came up with the number by doing research, using total capacity/cell capacity etc.Oh, c'mon. Most things in that video were sloppy. No particular reason to believe any of their numbers. "M3" indeed.
@rdalcanto, the results are quite striking. If the poll were to be asked to those outside of TMC I'm positive the results would be reversed. TMC contributors and readers have knowledge, and this knowledge is a very powerful thing. Thank you TMC! I now get all my daily news from TMC except the local weather forecast.
Not like it didn't happen before. We all got bitch slapped to Texas q1 2019.It will be embarrassing if 97%+ of TMC users are wrong....
True! I'd be very happy with $3500 in August. Depending on the violence of the movement, I'd take a chance on a hangover and would probably do some profit taking around $3000 and continue if the stock moves up from there, planning to buy back in on a return to earth from the squeeze.
Careful. Cyberspace is a trademark of Tesla, or is that of SpaceX....oh, wait...I was thinking of something else.Indeed, because cyberspace respects trademarks meticulously.
Don't forget to add and 'pee on both hands in the bathroom.....'Look bubba, you are knockin heads with some full on lazy asses when it comes to trying to get them to write with regards to standard norms to improve understanding.
Most around here still refer to the factories with a number even though our Ultra-leader has stated several times that the number system for Gigafactories leads to confusion. And instead they should be referred to buy the location of the factory.
That is MY take on it.
Fwiw, another reason for fast chinese industrial construction is that footings and foundation usually precede both building approval and environmental approvals. (Because just being allowed to lease land in an industrial park carries a defacto level of approval anyway.)
@JHoff90 , right you are. When I first started reading the Investors' thread on TMC I could get through reading all posts after 5 minutes each day, including the links provided. Back in May of this year I took a breather from TMC due to the level of noise and missed out on the rapid SP rise. The noise here is a small price to pay (it is free actually) for all the valuable information so gracious provided by most excellent posters of which I do not consider myself as one.so much noise on this thread...
OH Fredy... *face palm*Common sense grunglingly accepted at Elecktrik (a full day after the 'clix' are collected):
Panasonic denies ’13 million battery cell per day’ production at Tesla Gigafactory Nevada
"Panasonic denies the ’13 million battery cell per day’ production at Tesla Gigafactory Nevada disclosed in a new inside look at the factory. Yesterday, we reported on the science channel…"
No linx, No clix for redFay. Deal with it.
I just did a large write up on TSLA's S&P 500 inclusion for anyone interested. Reading this forum during the past few weeks I found that there were still a surprisingly large number of misunderstandings when it comes to the S&P 500 inclusion, so I hope this might help clear some of that up:
Tesla's S&P 500 Inclusion: Predicting TSLA's post-inclusion stock price