I was just thinking that it was kind of weird how Elon didn’t give this latest fsd update that he just shared on Twitter when he was on the conference call. It’s like he wants institutional investor to think its ways away but to his loyal fans he’s letting us know it’s coming real soon. It makes sense with him giving all these random clues like everything to the moon and Tesla will be the largest company soon. I for one am very bullish about all of this.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
World Red Cross Day ? I don't expect that to be a thing on SNL.
----------------------------------------------
Perhaps wipster is referring to International Outdoor Intercourse Day
Hooray, Hooray for the 8th of May!
powertoold
Active Member
It takes Tesla weeks to train their NN. It's possible that a new NN model was just deployed on their test fleet, and they had a meeting about it today.
mblakele
FSD Beta (99)
More evidence that battery costs are moving in the right direction.
Bet TSLA
Active Member
Game over! When you're building charging infrastructure in Tasmania, what worlds are left to conquer?
teslamotorsclub.com
Supercharger - Devonport, Tas
As mentioned in TOCA's April member update: Tesla is also at work constructing new Supercharging sites to enable convenient fast charging at additional routes across Australia. Keep an eye out for new locations coming soon in Devonport, TAS; Toombul, QLD; Geelong, VIC; Yea, VIC; Perth, WA...
teslamotorsclub.com
That may be but that would be a huge breakthrough. The timing of all this and what’s is going on is just too suspicious. God I love the suspense it’s giving me. When fsd hits it’s going to change the world.
Buckminster
Well-Known Member
New thread:cliffski said:
I've long thought we need a practical FUD_fighting thread here. Posts would be nothing more than links to easily upvoted/commented articles / tweets that the folks here can add their virtual weight to. Posts where people are asking honest opinions on issues surrounding EVs, or where people are being attacked by FUDsters on twitter/facebook/reddit wherever.
Most of us have actual day jobs, and not enough time to go searching for these battles, but up/downvoting appropriate posts and comments is trivial for me if people link to them from an uncluttered, easily viewed thread of such content.
TMC has a lot of members, we should focus our efforts. tweets and retweets are free
Help Fight the FUD
In my case I respond to the Tweet about how misleading it is
But I agree, maybe not the place for all this - a thread of "current FUD" where those of us inclined to do so could help fight the good fight, that would be useful
I won't be surprised to see SP not moving much for a while after FSD beta release.
Partly, it might take time for many to realize how much better it can get further from that version.
And, I would be surprised, if there isn't more FUD against FSD once the limited beta is out.
Of course, as a HODLer, I don't care much about the FUD, although less of it is always better for everyone, and am eagerly looking forward for the FSD beta
Something fishy here, first of all, there are 44 countries in Europe, not 11
Secondly, someone posted yesterday numbers showing 38k Model 3 delivered YTD in Europe
So what's the source of this?
I am not sure how much of an impact this would have on Chinese buyers, not sure how high nationalistic views are among Chinese these days. I hope the impact would not be significant to have any impact on projected sales in China.Apologies if this has been posted already. I have been reading but so many posts...
This I believe is one of the Chinese Government dailies. It sounds like pure FUD, with no hard facts outside of 'analysts say', but perhaps it is indicative of the CCP becoming prickly with Tesla? Would this explain the action to a degree the past couple of days? Personally, I do not buy that Chinese buyers would be turned off by this. OTOH, FUD is FUD. And China is important...
More than changes in the perception of the potential customers, I see this as a negative from the perspective of CCP's current position on Tesla, given how unfairly influential the Chinese government is.
P/E < 1000 leads to some buying?
I vaguely remember reading about some funds not buying because of P/E > 1000, and they would consider buying once the P/E falls.
Does anyone here have any thoughts on this? Should we anticipate in some uptick in volumes the next few days?
CH4 is indeed way more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2, but whereas CO2 stays in the atmosphere for thousands of years, CH4 degrades after 10. This is why CH4 from cows is an overstated issue (and CO2 a non-issue). Assuming the global herd doesn't increase too much, the total emissions are in a steady-state. Of course if you could reduce the herd or use technology to decrease their emissions, it would benefit the bigger picture
As per CO2 though, indeed, releasing new stores of methane is incredibly damaging short term, and doubly-so as the global warming it accelerates leads to permafrost melting which then releases even more and the impact escalates
Whatever you might read - and the fossil fuel industry is very clever at pointing the finger elsewhere - the trouble we find ourselves in now is totally down to the release of previously sequestered carbon into our atmosphere
So yes, it's very important to regulate this
Last edited:
Exceeding! According to Tesla Carriers Tesla are already at 13 car carriers, which is the same as last quarter. That only goes up to 19th May, and there were 3 car carriers after 19th Feb, so possibly 3 more ships not yet on the spreadsheet.
LiveLong&Profit
Member
2 more:
The question "Why hasn't traditional auto build out charging over the last 5 years" sets of a rant, where Sandy despairs re. traditional auto, saying they looked in the rear view mirror whereas Tesla saw the future. 'This is why traditional auto will never built charging, just as they didn't built gas stations.'
TS 1:13:52
"Do I sound bitter? I am bitter!
I said: 'You should really get into EVs. You should really pay attention to Tesla.'
And what I got back was:'Ha ha ha those guys will never catch us'
Kind of tough that what I predicted 6 years ago has come to fruition.
"
Not Tesla-specific, but re. quality engineering versus penny wise, pound foolish thinking:
TS 1:30:4
"Sandy's rule is: "Don't save me any money - I can't afford it!"
I'm an amateur dilettante when it comes to options, but I was looking at this option today, too. But then I saw that you can buy a March 2023 1000/1300 call spread for $45 (buying the $1000 for $175 and selling the $1300 for $130).
So, per my calculations, if I held both to expiration:
--With the spread, I can more than 6x my money if TSLA is above 1300 in 2 years ((1300-1000) x 100 shares = 30k.
--But if I just bought the straight $1000 call at $175, TSLA would have to be over $2050/share in March 2023 for me to 6x my money.
Of course, anything beyond $2050, and the straight call option would be more lucrative, as I'm capped at 30k with the spread.
Now I recognize that's a huge incentive (not being capped), plus the straight call will be more volatile in the short-term (i.e. potentially more profitable in the short term if you don't hold to duration).
But, man, that call spread sure seemed like an "easy" "low-risk" "low stress" way to 6x your money in two-years play (famous last words).
But again, I'm a rank amateur when it comes to options. Am I missing anything?
I don't know if these rumours have been reported yet. Seems from a legitimate source, but you can never tell with 3rd hand information on twitter.
Yes it right Elon confirm on Twitter new FSD Beta 9.0 in two week's.
He confirm also a possibility to expand to EU this version this Summer !
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/QOINIJGHJ5IZPPNNFKPF7KKZ4Q.jpg)
U.S. SEC enforcement head resigns after five days on the job
Alex Oh, who last week became the first woman of color to lead the U.S. securities watchdog's enforcement division resigned on Wednesday due to potential conflicts of interest created by her previous work as a lawyer, according to the agency and a person with direct knowledge of the matter.
www.reuters.com
"The SEC has failed the American people by repeatedly selecting Wall Street defense lawyers as Directors of Enforcement," said Dennis Kelleher, Chief Executive Officer of Better Markets, a Washington group advocating for Wall Street reform.
"They come to the SEC with needless and unhelpful baggage, including crippling conflicts of interest regarding current and past clients as well as a mindset...ill-suited to being an aggressive enforcer," he added.
Last edited:
One of these should be in the Earnings Reports.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
