More reflections on that utterly nauseating Slate article by Scott Woolley on how Tesla was worse than Solyndra. From the article's summary final paragraph:
Here’s hoping that proves true. In the meantime, the question of how to compensate taxpayers for Tesla-esque successes remains a distinct issue, one that the government would do well to pay more attention to the next time it plays venture capitalist.
No, Mr Woolley, that question most certainly does not remain "an issue". The marvelous success that is Tesla means that just this past month US taxpayers have been massively compensated by many billions just from one person alone, and the other resultant dollars that are and will be flowing to the US Treasury over the decades to come from the hundreds of billions - or trillions - of capital gains taxes are exactly the perfect kind of outcome that thoughtfully-considered pump-priming by the government is capitalism, occasionally tweaked by government, providing a win-win for all: private shareholders AND US taxpayers.
Were Mr Woolley's ill-thought-out platform to have occurred, then the resultant seats on Tesla's corporate board would have been the kind of governmental oversight damper that, far from championing pioneering activity, squelches same and ensures mediocrity. Germany's experience so clearly being shown with Volkswagen right now is the perfect counter-example that further provides proof of same.