Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Exactly what I feel, grand vision for x.com is much more than the definition of economy as of today, nor was it limited to earth.

Twitter would help bootstrap its user base, or else he could use Tesla app when FSD is ready, hence 3-5 years of speeding up.
Out of interest I pulled out some numbers to compare.

The card data is from 2014 so it is helpfuly before the rise of Apple Pay etc. Personally I think the Amex data and marketing claims have always been highly suspicious but that is a different matter. Some folks seem to think the TWTR userbase data is equally suspicious but what do I know.

VISA : US users = 304m ; non-US users = 545m ; TOT global users = 849m; US spend = $1,200 bn;
MASTERCARD : US users = 191m ; non-US users = 576m; TOT global users = 767m ; US spend = $676 bn;
AMEX : US users = 55m; non-US users = 57m; TOT global users = 112m ; US spend = $668 bn


TWTR : US users 77m; non-US users =129m ; TOT global users = 206m


So on that basis the userbase of TWTR is hepfully above Amex though below Visa/Mastercard.

By comparison there will be about 3.7m Tesla vehicles on the road at end-2022; growing to a cumulative Tesla fleet of 85m by end 2020 (assuming no retirals for simplicity).

In the media space the biggest newspapers by circulation top out at 9m, though in OECD english titles they struggleto break 2m.


And for TV they are surprisingly difficult to obtain data outside USA


But the most interesting datapoint is "International BBC News services now reach 456m people every week, " which of course is why the global far-right is so keen to strangle it


Anyway those numbers many help in the discussion re TWTR as a media play, and TWTR+ as a finance play.
 
Out of interest I pulled out some numbers to compare.

The card data is from 2014 so it is helpfuly before the rise of Apple Pay etc. Personally I think the Amex data and marketing claims have always been highly suspicious but that is a different matter. Some folks seem to think the TWTR userbase data is equally suspicious but what do I know.

VISA : US users = 304m ; non-US users = 545m ; TOT global users = 849m; US spend = $1,200 bn;
MASTERCARD : US users = 191m ; non-US users = 576m; TOT global users = 767m ; US spend = $676 bn;
AMEX : US users = 55m; non-US users = 57m; TOT global users = 112m ; US spend = $668 bn


TWTR : US users 77m; non-US users =129m ; TOT global users = 206m


So on that basis the userbase of TWTR is hepfully above Amex though below Visa/Mastercard.

By comparison there will be about 3.7m Tesla vehicles on the road at end-2022; growing to a cumulative Tesla fleet of 85m by end 2020 (assuming no retirals for simplicity).

In the media space the biggest newspapers by circulation top out at 9m, though in OECD english titles they struggleto break 2m.


And for TV they are surprisingly difficult to obtain data outside USA


But the most interesting datapoint is "International BBC News services now reach 456m people every week, " which of course is why the global far-right is so keen to strangle it


Anyway those numbers many help in the discussion re TWTR as a media play, and TWTR+ as a finance play.
When evaluating Tesla App’s reach, I think the real growth will come from Tesla Network, where it would reach to none-Tesla owners, at that point fleet size might not be a good starting point to do the user base estimation. Also, considering Tesla would license FSD to other car makers, but would likely not allow them to create their own RoboTaxi network, this makes estimating the fleet size itself difficult already.

Good thing is it will cover a union of dense urban population and price sensitive population(assuming price parity with public transportation, and lower than car ownership), which are often the key to roll out revolutionary solutions.

A bit OT now, but some food for thought on yet another potential revenue stream when Tesla Network becomes reality.
 
Maybe I missed it but I don't see that Elon's interview on the Full Send podcast was posted yet:


Elon doesn't show up in it until ~17 minutes in.

warning: it is over three hours long.
Interesting that he reveals that the consequences of appearing on the Rogan show cost SpaceX to have to endure a year of random drug testing company wide. This is all on Rogan as I see it since he designed the stunt for his own benefit. Clicks for me, too bad for you.
 
If Tesla chooses to and drops the Model 3 prices, it will be model 3 on steroids as well. But even if the Model 3 price doesn’t drop and thus it doesn’t get the credit, it’s still a big positive for Tesla. That’s because cars like Polestar will lose their credit that they currently get.
Yes, although the upcoming Polestar 3 will be made in South Carolina.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CHGolferJim
Is there a final version that contains the actual final verbiage? (my bill-finding-foo is not that strong I guess...)

I've read a ton of contracts, but even a redlined contract is easier to read than this one (which is 755 pages and I think what you are referring to).

As an example below of how hard it is to read...

"(i) in the matter preceding subpara2 graph (A), by striking ‘‘qualified plug-in 3 electric drive motor’’ and inserting 4 ‘‘clean’’, 5 (ii) in subparagraph (C), by inserting 6 ‘‘qualified’’ before ‘‘manufacturer’’, 7 (iii) in subparagraph (F)— 8 (I) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘4’’ 9 and inserting ‘‘7’’, and 10 (II) in clause (ii), by striking 11 ‘‘and’’ at the end, 12 (iv) in subparagraph (G), by striking 13 the period at the end and inserting ‘‘, 14 and’’, and 15 (v) by adding at the end the following:
Rob Maurer created an updated version last time. Don't know if he'll go through the pain again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Discoducky
Interesting that he reveals that the consequences of appearing on the Rogan show cost SpaceX to have to endure a year of random drug testing company wide. This is all on Rogan as I see it since he designed the stunt for his own benefit. Clicks for me, too bad for you.

I agree, but that was quite the miscalculation on Elon's part as well. Totally insane that a single puff of cannabis nearly jeopardized the SpaceX relationship with the US govt. Pretty good indicator of how fossilized that bureaucracy is. He could have taken Tequila shots until he was blabbering like a fool and his liver was dying without a tenth of the reaction from the geriatrics on high.
 
Interesting that he reveals that the consequences of appearing on the Rogan show cost SpaceX to have to endure a year of random drug testing company wide. This is all on Rogan as I see it since he designed the stunt for his own benefit. Clicks for me, too bad for you.
Supergenius Elon tricked by bro Rogan? No this was 100% on Elon.
 
I agree, but that was quite the miscalculation on Elon's part as well. Totally insane that a single puff of cannabis nearly jeopardized the SpaceX relationship with the US govt. Pretty good indicator of how fossilized that bureaucracy is. He could have taken Tequila shots until he was blabbering like a fool and his liver was dying without a tenth of the reaction from the geriatrics on high.

Sometimes people are really adept at choosing a forum name that seemingly synchronises very nicely with their beliefs.
 
Does the 30% tax credit apply to fleet sales of the 3 and Y?
Doubtful (in a useful manner):
Credit is lesser of
30% of cost for BEV vehicles
OR
Incremental cost increase relative to ICE equivilent.

AND
Credit is capped at $7,500 for vehicles under 14,000 pounds Gross Vehicle Weight Rating.

This seems interesting depending the comparison for incremental equivilent. What would an S/X compare to? Still capped at $7,500, but may allow credit on company owned/ used cars.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Fred42
Interesting did anyone ask a question to Musk on where they are on the 4680 mass production ramp and how the DBE process is scaling?
Answer:


Sort of OT, but since this is a weekend, for those who are recently interested in TSLA / Tesla, a few pointers, personal views

If you are interested in maximizing your portfolio returns*, I strongly advise watching that last AGM Shareholder meeting, and maybe pause at times to fully digest what is being presented. Then look up the whole thread Moderator's choice: Posts of particular Merit, in particular look up @Gigacast's recent one - ; for news about Tesla, just skip any mainstream media posts (95% are consistently lying and anti Tesla, so why bother), rather get a quick fix, including debunking any recent MSM "news" from Rob Maurer's daily news. If you want to know why TSLA share price did what it did yesterday, look up @Papafox daily review and to understand what moves TSLA intra day or really most of the time, see for example @Papafox recent post
If you think you can choose your stocks based on your hunches (based on the 'news' or investment advisory blogs, paid or not), just split your investments in 2 equal parts, one all TSLA, the other what you normally do. And monitor over the years. Remember what/ who you are against. besides the usual huge players who manipulate the markets, or are plain very good at it, like Jim Simon's Renaissance Tech (whose fund has TSLA as its 2nd top holding BTW, and I'm sure they're trading it well - hi there Renaissance techs or rather algos ;D ) there are hundreds of small hedge funds with the smartest minds and access to info and tech an order of magnitude above what the individual investor has.

(*) TL;dr IMHO Easiest formula is to invest all you can (that you know you won't need to draw upon for the next year) in TSLA - the only variants are in timing and whether you are ready to trade options, one or two levels up in trading chops

PS. Back to reality: if this is the *EXPONENTIAL* growth of cars delivered, AND you know the Gross Profit per car is around 28% and climbing, what do you think the SP will do?

Tesla.AGM.fleet.size.exponentl.jpg
 
Last edited:
So Elon says FSD 10.69 is dropping on 8/20?

I get why he's calling it 10.69, but what is the significance of 8/20? He can't know for sure that the release date is 8/20, so is there some numerology I am missing?
2 weeks out. One more week internal, one week limited Beta release, then wide Beta release. Should be achievable target.
Last weekend before the split
Twice as good as 420 (without overflowing into September)
 
Well, thank you for saving me the time and, quite possibly, my computer screen. If they’re as bad as you describe…then I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised, other than that Mr Musk hung in there.
That was my first reaction, but what changed my mind is hearing that it was during this interview that Elon said (decided?) he's stopping his habit of looking up his cellphone on awakening, and instead will do a 20 min workout. Anybody has the time stamp, pls let us (or me via DM) know**.

Looks like he did follow up on that based on his much improved appearance at the last AGM
This in itself represents another 10% + in productivity for Elon and adds another couple of years in his Tesla/ SpaceX / other productive years.

So I started looking up that interview, and what struck me is how Elon is really at ease with *any* level, can interact so well and take advantage to gently sell his agenda/ views. Few CEO's or just few people have that skill. Limiting one's view comes at a price, which we obviously aren't aware of.

If Elon did change his habits based on that interview, that would be a perfect example of how beneficial it is to be (intelligently) open to not-the-usual we all fall prey to.

(**) Edit: thanks @JRP3 for that link - not from the FullSend whole interview but the relevant part is there

 
Last edited:
Looks like he did follow up on that based on his much improved appearance at the last AGM


Since it's the weekend as a public service and having done some research into pre workout drinks I can say the one they are shilling is just overpriced caffeine with under dosing of any of the other potential ergogenic aids. I'll link a video in the Off Topic thread that goes into more detail.
 
Something to think about

Very little to think about, since the production per factory is not clarified, and the ramp times are a moving target.
I also think that this little exercise misses the much more important elephant in the room: Volume 4680 production. This is the key to massive scaling since it unlocks supply and cell price that will move Tesla to where hundreds of millions of customers can buy the car.

Addendum: This arithmetic tweet may have come from a Q&A in the recent stockholder meeting. Elon said that Fremont production will max out in the 800k/year range but the currently ramping and future gigafactories will be in the 1.5 - 2.0M/year each range when at full speed. So we can start with 1.75*3+.8 = 6M eventually from Fremont/Shanghai/Berlin/Austin. That leaves 14M to be covered by 14/1.75 = 8 new, as yet undisclosed factories in the future. That matches up with Elon's statement that 12 factories will produce 20M vehicles. The tweet you linked did not understand that 12 factories include 4 that are already on the ground or in advanced stages of completion.

If Tesla announces a new GF every year through 2030, they will come close to meeting what is obviously a very aspirational goal. And since they have already proven themselves capable of building out 3 gigafactories concurrently, I don't see any reason to doubt the possibility of this happening.
 
Last edited:
Answer:


Sort of OT, but since this is a weekend, for those who are recently interested in TSLA / Tesla, a few pointers, personal views

If you are interested in maximizing your portfolio returns*, I strongly advise watching that last AGM Shareholder meeting, and maybe pause at times to fully digest what is being presented. Then look up the whole thread Moderator's choice: Posts of particular Merit, in particular look up @Gigacast's recent one - ; for news about Tesla, just skip any mainstream media posts (95% are consistently lying and anti Tesla, so why bother), rather get a quick fix, including debunking any recent MSM "news" from Rob Maurer's daily news. If you want to know why TSLA share price did what it did yesterday, look up @Papafox daily review and to understand what moves TSLA intra day or really most of the time, see for example @Papafox recent post
If you think you can choose your stocks based on your hunches (based on the 'news' or investment advisory blogs, paid or not), just split your investments in 2 equal parts, one all TSLA, the other what you normally do. And monitor over the years. Remember what/ who you are against. besides the usual huge players who manipulate the markets, or are plain very good at it, like Jim Simon's Renaissance Tech (whose fund has TSLA as its 2nd top holding BTW, and I'm sure they're trading it well - hi there Renaissance techs or rather algos ;D ) there are hundreds of small hedge funds with the smartest minds and access to info and tech an order of magnitude above what the individual investor has.

(*) TL;dr IMHO Easiest formula is to invest all you can (that you know you won't need to draw upon for the next year) in TSLA - the only variants are in timing and whether you are ready to trade options, one or two levels up in trading chops

PS. Back to reality: if this is the *EXPONENTIAL* growth of cars delivered, AND you know the Gross Profit per car is around 28% and climbing, what do you think the SP will do?

View attachment 837661
Bravo. This post has Particular Merit. Well done.