Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
That sharp drop on heavy volume around 10:38 ET sure looks like $150 stop loss orders getting triggered.

Nice recovery in the last hour, and a big over-performance against QQQ. Wishing this isn't Lucy with the football again.
Every TSLA investor is so shook they won't dare call this the bottom lol
 
In order for this to be the bottom for TSLA, it’s not enough that TSLA goes green. NASDAQ has to go green too.

In this epic struggle between market bears and bulls, strength in TSLA could drag the NASDAQ uphill, but the shorts are going to fight this to the death.

If NASDAQ ends green today, I’m calling today the bottom for TSLA and a reversal for the overall market.
 
Oh thank God, there is hope of a turnaround for our stock yet!!!! :D

I wonder how hard the MM's will try to keep it down? Will they be happy with achieving the 150's or will they go for lower yet?

Well, hedge funds clearly wanted to trigger the stops at 150 and weren't going to be denied. Guess that makes 'Oppy' a hedge fund? Anybody know if they're allowed proprietary trading as well as rating TSLA stock?

Put options likely a big factor in the MMD this moring: tip-off is the peak right 09:45 ET when options MMs start to delta hedge for their net exposure after options contracts have traded for the first 15 min of the session:

TSLA.2022-12-19.09-45.Hi2.png


Is anybody able to post a screenie of the intraday Options Volume chart? TIA.


TSLA rallying at bit since the bottom which occurred (suspiciously) at 11:59 a.m. with robust volume today at 83.3M shares traded by 1:00 p.m. ;)

sc.TSLA.50-DayChart.2022-12-13-15.png

Cheers to the Longs!
 
Last edited:
Last time bears and shorts attempted to decimate Tesla between 2018 through 2019 it eventually cost them billions
this time around after making billions off shorting and manipulating Tesla stock between November 2021 through present day, probability favors bears and shorts losing to tune of trillions over next several years
i got my own strategy to take money from shorts over next several years and it will cost them
a lot
 
Last time bears and shorts attempted to decimate Tesla between 2018 through 2019 it eventually cost them billions
this time around after making billions off shorting and manipulating Tesla stock between November 2021 through present day, probability favors bears and shorts losing to tune of trillions over next several years
i got my own strategy to take money from shorts over next several years and it will cost them
a lot
accumulate and HODL is the only thing that comes to my mind. margin, options all those fun tools of 2015-2021 have only hurt me for the last 12 months, and could easily longer...
 
In order for this to be the bottom for TSLA, it’s not enough that TSLA goes green. NASDAQ has to go green too.

In this epic struggle between market bears and bulls, strength in TSLA could drag the NASDAQ uphill, but the shorts are going to fight this to the death.

If NASDAQ ends green today, I’m calling today the bottom for TSLA and a reversal for the overall market.
TSLA can absolutely bottom before the macro's bottom. If the stock could break solidly above the high it set this morning on strong 2nd half of day volume, it would certainly suggest a bottom with a strong intraday reversal.

But we've seen plenty of these head fakes over the past few weeks so who knows really. Idk, I still feel like hedge funds want this to close under 150 for at least a couple days so hard for me to see this being the bottom.
 
Helpful. Are the materials/parts sourcing and assembly criteria different from the other vehicle credit?
Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit does not appear to require North American final assembly (by reference, NA requirement is (G)).
c) QUALIFIED COMMERCIAL CLEAN VEHICLE.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘qualified commercial clean vehicle’ means any vehicle which— ‘‘(1) meets the requirements of section 30D(d)(1)(C) and is acquired for use or lease by the taxpayer and not for resale, ‘‘
(2) either— ‘‘(A) meets the requirements of subparagraph (D) of section 30D(d)(1) and is manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways (not including a vehicle operated exclusively on a rail or rails), or
(C)
which is made by a qualified manufacturer,

(D)
which is treated as a motor vehicle for purposes of title II of the Clean Air Act,
 
So the $3750 discount only applies to December deliveries in the United States. Expected that Fremont produced about 110K 3s and Ys. Texas an additional 30K Model Ys. So if lets say 60% of those were sold in October and November. That leaves about 56K that could have gotten the $3750 credit. That would be a hit of $210M. if 430K deliveries this would be about a $450 per delivered car hit. Also this mix will be the highest price that these cars have been since nearly all of the cars ordered at lower prices were previously delivered.
You also have to consider that the COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) is decreasing because Texas and Berlin are ramping up. Economies of scale will be realized at those two factories where they used to be cash incinerators as the factories were being built with little to no output.

This might be offset by inflationary pressure but there are so many factors that go in to this calculation that we can only guestimate until the true numbers are released.
 
Helpful. Are the materials/parts sourcing and assembly criteria different from the other vehicle credit?
There are no material/assembly criteria. This is why some automakers are hoping they can use this as a loophole around the requirement. One article I quickly found.


There was another article where Manchin quoted as having a big issue if the administration allows this as it was not the intent of the bill.

Found right from the source.

 
Last edited:
IMO it's not his behavior, it's the fears that he is destroying demand. If he keeps up the act but sales continue to rise in the next few quarters that concern will fall away.
I have thought a lot about this. I think that $TSLA brand destruction and Tesla brand destruction are very different topics that just happen to rhyme.

In my work I’m surrounded by people of all political associations and the firehouse table is a forum where few topics are off limits; unsurprisingly the Musk saga is very popular of late. My experience in discussions with my colleagues has been very different from TMC. Reactions have actually been quite positive and fits their understanding of EM as a disruptor that DGAF. No cancellations; but firemen are also cheap, so many now waiting for that sweet IRA govt. cheese in ‘23.

I’ll admit as a $TSLA investor I have been doubting some of my convictions due to recent antics and acquisitions; I believe that to conflate consumer demand for Tesla products with investor demand for TSLA shares is narrow sighted…and smells like opportunity.
 
Last edited: