There is a thread for this....Deleted, ban-worthy post
please please please?
Last edited by a moderator:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a thread for this....Deleted, ban-worthy post
Graham Stephan’s critical note. It is true about lots of broken promises
EVs and energy storage are ultimately very large markets with plenty of room for growth, that often means there is room for a few competitors.Well in Auto they have BYD and others. On energy they are competing with their cell provider, CATL. Since CATL has 34% of world marketshare this puts Tesla in an awkard and vulnerable spot. Maybe ok for a couple of years but it could get ugly as competitors ramp. CATL is directly competing for large solar projects today and has won several in North America.
They displaced very very expensive grid/ frequency balancing services. The most expensive electric power there is by a long shot. That is a lot of the current market. Once battery has that captured (and it will) the next most profitable is a long long drop. Basically time shifting peak demand. @petit_bateau and other experts could weigh in I am just sounding caution alarms to not get carried away with extravagant profit forecasts. Both because the value of the batteries decreases to the utilities and because other vendors may be better positioned ina price war.Enh, Hornsdale paid itself off in two years. At those rates, one year is half the price. And that's assuming the grid can handle not having that buffer in the meantime (storage also replaces new peaker plants) Tesla's Big Battery In Hornsdale Earned Back Its Cost In 2 Years, Highlighting Why Renewables Are Beating Coal
General comment: Future Self Driving
Well, to the best of my knowledge “coup de grâce” is French - not English.It’s a blessed thing my opinion of Mr Musk’s command of English and ability to use apposite quasi-literary terms now is quite low….
…..otherwise I should be rather petrified at his “coup de grâce” reference. Let us all pray he does not know what that truly can mean.
It's pretty clear right on the Tesla website.Ran into an interesting situation from two potential buyers today. They were wondering when the auto park feature would be available again and implied that they understood that it wouldn’t be available until new sensors were installed on cars that didn’t have them. I was under the impression that USS was gone for good and that the function would be looked after by tesla vision. These guys are adamant about waiting for the new hardware and that lots of buyers are waiting. I think they’ll be waiting awhile but maybe I misunderstood.
Can anyone shed any light on that?
I think Musk said that referring to de-platforming the Twitter bots, and it wasn't referencing anything about Tesla at all.Well, to the best of my knowledge “coup de grâce” is French - not English.
Energy storage was always a big part of battery day IMO, To be really competitive on energy storage cost Tesla needs 4680 cell production to work.
Lena is not Lorena. There are two different people.The bill was sponsored by Senate Transportation Committee Chair Lena Gonzalez, who claimed that Tesla falsely advertised its tech and that doing so was a safety issue.
Fool, self driving.Fake Self Driving
At this point I think it’d be more positive for TSLA if she reported she’d liquidated her holdings.Cathie Wood's ARK Invest bought TSLA for the seventh session out of the last eight.
Today: ARKK bought 20,458 TSLA shares
I have never heard this guy doing a fundamental analysis on any company. How would he know if Tesla was trading on fundamentals or not?Graham Stephan’s critical note. It is true about lots of broken promises
In your comparison of Tesla recently to Apple and Amazon in the past, your befuddlement stems from ignoring the elephant in the room--their CEO's behavior and reputation.I don't think it can be stated enough how historic the landslide in TSLA stock has been. Yes other stocks have had big drops in the past, even companies that went on to be giants (Amazon/Apple), I've never seen an instance where a megacap stock went down 60% in the same time span that the macro's were down 4-6%....based on no real data. The biggest drops we've seen in recent history were all associated with abrupt earnings/guidance changes or huge misses on earnings/guidance. Tesla has had neither.
Apple during it's massive drop in 2008-2009 followed the macros. Same with Amazon. This however, it not one of those cases. It's a stock being specifically targeted with massive puts positions naked shorting.
I don't remember anyone ever awarding Bezos and Jobs some sort of passionate, kind hearted, and non-controversial CEO.In your comparison of Tesla recently to Apple and Amazon in the past, your befuddlement stems from ignoring the elephant in the room--their CEO's behavior and reputation.
I mean in terms of Tesla sourcing raw materials for iron cathodes and making LFP cells in house for vehicles and energy storage.Do you mean in terms of dry electrode or silicon anode? Because LFP doesn't need cylinders. And utility storage doesn't need high gravimetric nor volumetric energy density.
I have never heard this guy doing a fundamental analysis on any company. How would he know if Tesla was trading on fundamentals or not?
Anyways, broken promises or not, every move was calculated to bring Tesla the highest amount of revenue and net income. Piss off customers?...sure...but pissed off investor?...Uh no.
Apparently many people.No doubt you'd sell your losers who probably have no hope or less hope of coming back. But who sells your long maturing goldmine, am I right?