Tesla didn't APPEAR to record any Cybertruck deliveries in Q4 (perhaps they were all employees). In Q1, they have obviously delivered some. As the volumes are so small, it is fair to assume Q1 will be the first quarter to show material negative COGS for the Cybertrucks that have been delivered...with actually worsening total COGS for each quarter until the volumes ramp to "break-even"? I'm probably not explaining that well, but basically as Elon indicated in the earnings call (i.e. a drain for about 18 months).
Different ways to interpret what Elon said about the Cybertruck:
"It's a great product, but financially, it will take, I don't know, a year to 18 months before it is a
significant positive cash flow contributor."
My mind focuses on that word "significant."
Tesla is a company producing and delivering roughly 2,000,000 vehicles per year profitably. If each of those contributes some thousands of dollars to the positive cash flow, then what does the Cybertruck have to do to be considered a "significant" contributor to the total cash flow, even of just the automotive branch of the business?
If, at some later date, 1% of the positive cash flow is from Cybertruck, is that significant? 5%? 10%?
I never felt like Elon was saying the Cybertruck would be a drain...just that it will be a while before production optimization and production numbers are up high enough for Cybertruck to make a notable contribution to Tesla's cash flow. When compared to 2,000,000 other vehicles produced annually, it feels like Cybertruck would need to be up in the 100,000 (5%) or 200,000 (10%) range to become a significant part of Tesla's positive cash flow total.
By that metric, it's debatable whether the Model S and Model X are considered significant contributors to Tesla's cash flow. So, in a way, Elon might be indirectly indicating when he foresees the Cybertruck outselling the S and X....and we know plans for the ramp only keep going up from there.