It's good to see Tesla has released a Carbon Ceramic Brake kit for the Plaid. Regardless it's for Street or Track, Pro and Con, Worth it or Not... just like the
endless debates on rennlist's (Porsche forum) "
PCCB or Not To Be", we can at least have the following observations:
1. CCB is a new brake technology with many advantage (although has its shortcomings) over conventional iron brakes (whether you agree or not) that no motor company (Including Tesla) can ignore.
2. Since the initial introduction of Pccb for Porsche 996 GT3 (optional) until now 992 Turbo S (Default), there are significant improvement in disc material as well as the production process which make CCB performs better and more durable than 20 years ago, especially the long (continuous) carbon fibers (Aftermarket) are now widely used to replace short (chopped) carbon fibers (Brembo/OE) which is a big stride in "strength" and "durability" improvement on CCB.
3. Advantage and Economy Consideration - The initial CCB buying cost is higher than iron brake but if a proper caliper & pads are used, front and rear kits are balanced.
The only consumable is the brake pad. CCB rotors are literally indestructible, never crack (from thermal stress), wear, or warp like iron would. So over the time the maintenance and down time cost is actual cheaper than iron, let alone it always provides you that confidence inspiring spirit you need on tracks than worries and attention on iron brakes.
Reference reading: WHY CARBON CERAMIC BRAKE?
Stick to conventional wisdom like a general advice you would hear from some experts, OR embrace the new technology with your own research and endeavor - Your choice and never have to be intimidated by those venders who only can supply iron brakes with biased opinion.
Finally: Does Your Track Car Need Carbon Ceramic Brakes?