bollar
Disgruntled Member
Excellent!As a follow-up, there now is a Forbes article re the Interstate Commerce aspect: North Carolina's Threat To Tesla Likely Unconstitutional - Forbes
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Excellent!As a follow-up, there now is a Forbes article re the Interstate Commerce aspect: North Carolina's Threat To Tesla Likely Unconstitutional - Forbes
Need to track down who the members are of those committees and flood them with phone calls and emails.NCGA said:Ref to the Com on Transportation, if favorable, Commerce and Job Development
Need to track down who the members are of those committees and flood them with phone calls and emails.
Thank you for sharing you views on SB 327. The bill concerns a number of provisions affecting automobile dealers and manufacturers. Other than the provision affecting Tesla, all of the provisions have been worked out. In committee, I raised the Tesla issue and expressed my concerns with the sponsor and the full committee on two or three occasions.
The bill was going to pass the committee no matter what I did and will almost certainly pass out of the Senate. My goal is to achieve an accommodation of Tesla's concerns. Since I do not have the power or votes to secure it, I must work to try to convince the bill sponsor to accept it.
I believe that if you were to ask the representatives from Tesla, they would tell you that they appreciate my efforts to try to resolve their issue. The legislative process is often not clean or clear. That said, different people, even with the same viewpoint, believe different actions are appropriate. I respect your thoughts and appreciate your sharing them with me.
Please feel free to contact me again should you have questions about this or other legislation.
Sincerely,
Josh Stein
That situation is even better for them. They can vote for it and satisfy their "obligations" to the dealer lobby and then let the Federal government undo it. "Shucks, Dealers, we tried, but too bad it didn't work out...."Send them a link to the Forbes' article. Ask them why they would want to be a test case and tie up state funds defending it in court. What's the benefit to the state in doing that? If they realize they are violating Federal law, they may pass on it
Articulate, but not very satisfying.With some further prompting, I finally got a response from my senator:
Forgive me if I got lost in this discussion, but does the whole "not on a computer" aspect mean that even an established dealer can no longer configure your car with the manufacturer and order it for you?
If I recall correctly this had to be passed by the house by Thursday. I haven't heard that it passes.
From what the morning fish-wrap said, since the bill made it out of Senate, that is enough to keep it alive; the deadline was that in order for a bill (without certain exceptions) to stay alive, it had to "cross over" from one side to the other.
...
For those new to the thread, Musk goes into quite some detail why this is their position on the Tesla blog: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars | Blog | Tesla Motors
I think the key is that the "sale" has to happen in the showroom. The car can be ordered online, but the purchase has to happen at a licensed dealer's showroom.
That has George's writing style all over it. Have yet to to hear Elon use a word even close to, "delightful".
- - - Updated - - -
So can the customer in the showroom order a car from their phone or laptop?
No, because the bill says you have to be a licensed dealer with a showroom to order a car on the internet. It doesn't not only say that the order must take place in a showroom (so you can't just bring a laptop or phone into someone else's showroom and do an order).So can the customer in the showroom order a car from their phone or laptop?