ZachF
Active Member
Tesla is still in it's multi-year upward channel. As long as it doesn't break below ~$255.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
Oh my. This is going to get REAL interesting.
Twitter
“The CIO of a major pension fund is the one who deserves credit for uncovering this scam”
“The CIO of a major pension fund is the one who deserves credit for uncovering this scam”
Both were *extremely* tactical. They didn't make silly taunts. They used *tactics*. (Both *did* have skeletons in their closet, FYI).
It did come back in 2008 or 2009. That’s what kicked in last Friday.
mltv
Member
I am pretty serious about this. He could create a account elon_not_a_official_release channel which he can post anything he wants and not counted as an official security channel. Why not?
Clearly not. Why would you think that? "The market" seems to be the last to know anything...
She's written a book about sleep thus prejudiced. Frankly, I like naps anytime.
We could see this tomorrow.Tesla is still in it's multi-year upward channel. As long as it doesn't break below ~$255.
Anyone smarter than me able to estimate the minimum # of shares to make the 2000 investor cut off?
mblakele
FSD Beta (99)
Not the same. Pre-1997 the uptick rule was active all the time, not just on sharp dips.
From what I've read though, economists are divided on its efficacy. Where's that one-handed economist?
Hmm...wow roller coaster here we come...tighten down.
No, once they imitate a position they will still slander. What we need to do is pull together articles that were demonstrably untrue. And have the SEC go after those people. It’s already illegal to slander... the SEC just needs a list spoon fed to them. I’ll start a post after.
I've met several. For every empirical study saying short-selling makes the market more efficient, I can find one saying short-selling makes the market less efficient. I've concluded that on the whole it doesn't actually have much effect.
Disinformation campaigns are another matter.
Nor is he oblivious of his obligations to those who trust him to invest their capital prudently.
Tesla has always been the quintessential jockey bet. If Anderson decides the jockey's conduct in the last three months raises concerns about his judgment and maturity, he might reconsider Baillee Gifford's concentration in shares without waiting to see if the promise of those future quarters is realized. If he did so last Friday or before, we'll see in mid November.
Fund managers and investment advisors have to make unemotional decisions. Few are likely to embrace recidivist, destructive tweeting.
ZachF
Active Member
My theory of whats going on:
1. Elon did not want to settle in the first place, wanted to fight the SEC to prove his innocence
2. When stock tanked last Friday, he realized the case will hurt shareholders too much and ruin positive effects of Q3 results, so he decided to compromise and signed the settlement
3. Q3 results did not give the effect to the SP he expected, media FUD nullified it, SP kept going down this week, which angered him that he compromised for nothing
4. Judge asking for letter explaining the fairness of the settlement gave him an excuse to back-pedal on the deal and go back to fighting, so now he wants the SEC to walk away, thus he is tweeting mocking them
1. Elon did not want to settle in the first place, wanted to fight the SEC to prove his innocence
2. When stock tanked last Friday, he realized the case will hurt shareholders too much and ruin positive effects of Q3 results, so he decided to compromise and signed the settlement
3. Q3 results did not give the effect to the SP he expected, media FUD nullified it, SP kept going down this week, which angered him that he compromised for nothing
4. Judge asking for letter explaining the fairness of the settlement gave him an excuse to back-pedal on the deal and go back to fighting, so now he wants the SEC to walk away, thus he is tweeting mocking them
Collect them in the thread for this purpose, please
Join push for SEC Investigation of TSLA manipulators and inside traders
ZachF
Active Member
Manipulative short selling that tries to use disinformation and market reflexivity to create a negative self-fulfilling prophecy is categorically bad though.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
