BTW., near the end of their description the SEC begrudgingly admits that Elon did not profit from his "conduct" and that any resulting price action was reversed within 24 hours or so:
SEC: "Defendants’ apparent lack of pecuniary gain, and the limited temporal scope of the conduct."
So the SEC filed a lawsuit in record short time, over action that didn't offer any gain...
And as punishment they wanted to bar Elon freaking Musk
for life from being the CEO of a public company, while over the misconduct leading up to the financial crisis of 2008 that created permanent damage in the trillions and profited perpetrators to the hundreds of billions the SEC did exactly
nothing.
The mind boggles ...
Also note that the lack of gain also robbed the SEC of most of their statutory backing for enforcement action. Regulation
SEC Rule 10b-5 specifically states:
"in connection with the purchase or sale of any security."
Which Elon didn't do: he neither bought nor sold securities in that time period. The expansive reading of the SEC of the Securities Act, which contradicts the legislative record, to mean they can regulate and sue
anyone who is doing something that has an effect on the stock market in any fashion the SEC disapproves of is very likely unlawful and would have been curtailed by judges by Elon's lawsuit.
But only after years of collateral damage to Tesla shareholders due to protracted litigation ...