Does this likely mean any large energy deal in Saudi Arabia won't happen? Or maybe he is only talking strictly about investor funding: Elon Musk says Tesla 'probably would not' take money from Saudi Arabia now
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt any big energy deal with KSA by anyone right now (except Chinese). Its become too toxic.Does this likely mean any large energy deal in Saudi Arabia won't happen? Or maybe he is only talking strictly about investor funding: Elon Musk says Tesla 'probably would not' take money from Saudi Arabia now
You are completely ignoring the mid-term elections next week. Macros will largely determine where TSLA goes.
My feeling is when you have Trump as president, the mid term elections are non event. It doesn't matter if democrats will take over or republicans stay. Maybe I'am getting it wrong because I don't live in US
I believe he is referring to financing money. He is not refusing to sell products that tesla makesDoes this likely mean any large energy deal in Saudi Arabia won't happen? Or maybe he is only talking strictly about investor funding: Elon Musk says Tesla 'probably would not' take money from Saudi Arabia now
Yep. Looks like the biggest risk for the market continues to be a hawkish Fed. This jobs report certainly won't change the Feds mind on that.
Tesla is like a octopus the shorts are wrestling with 1 or 2 arms while the other ones grow and grow.
The SP continues it's inexorable rise.
Exactly the thought. Stockpile them next to a port and you can have them wired into the grid anywhere in the world a few weeks later.
A 40-foot ISO container has 43,9 times the internal volume as a 100kWh powerpack. Now, with powerpacks, you also have to have power modules, not just energy modules, which argues for multiplying by less than 43,9 - but you'll also be able to use space more efficiently, and energy density will be growing. Let's just say 45x. So 4,5 MWh per container. A single cargo ship could carry tens of GWh. Equivalent to hundreds of the Australian battery farm.
Not bad at all.
I suspect they are planning for day that modlS and modelX sales slow and maybe use some of the robots and factory sales for other modelsSo what I meant is that the minimal capex 7,000/week target looks conservative, and they might be able to reach 7,500 or 8,000/week.
But IMO the actual level doesn't even matter much: Tesla made over a billion dollars in Q3 alone, they could afford even "significant" capex. Their Model S/X/3 lines are almost literally printing money.
The level of capex mostly matters in terms of timing of future growth:
- "minimal capex": low cost improvements with little lead time, with a time frame of "months". 4,000/week to 7,000/week is probably this.
- "incremental capex": equipment probably already specced and ordered, buildings under construction. Time frame of "quarters". Shanghai might be an example of this.
- "capex": long lead time of at least a year. I'd expect the Model Y to be this.
Indeed they are, but not specific to any reported amounts, its a seasonally adjusted amount based on their prior models. My prior point that was this year is so disproportionate to any prior year in the past 10 for seasonal hiring, that the MODEL they use can be realistically low, but still influenced by BLS reporting.The jobs reports are usually seasonally adjusted.
@BenPrice @neroden OFF Topic warningThe only reason not to do this is the expense of installing metering and tracking usage. (Which is actually the original reason why Tesla didn't; Tesla chargers are cheaper to install than many because they don't have payment or usage tracking in the chargers.)
Sometimes it's significantly easier, at installation time, to not meter it at all. You can do pay-per-hour on the honor system, which is substantially less capital-intensive. And since you don't really care whether it's accurate -- the price is a deterrent to overuse, not a profit center -- the honor system is OK. Works well as long as there's *someone* at the front desk willing to handle the payments/check-in/check-out.
Does this likely mean any large energy deal in Saudi Arabia won't happen? Or maybe he is only talking strictly about investor funding: Elon Musk says Tesla 'probably would not' take money from Saudi Arabia now
Can someone confirm with an official link, had the Saudi PIF ALREADY purchased 2B in Tesla, or were SAYING they were going to purchase 2B+ in Tesla.
Sorry, can't read link.. FT is the worst with their paywall.They already did- Subscribe to read | Financial Times
However, as Elon mentioned in the last interview- they might have already sold that stake for all we know.
Edit- Source for the above (Full Q&A: Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Recode Decode):
All right. So the challenge you face is financial, though. Getting funding and stuff like that. And you’ve gotten ... Saudis had bought a big bunch of your stock, that’s just separate, they —
They might have sold it, I don’t know.
They already did- Subscribe to read | Financial Times
However, as Elon mentioned in the last interview- they might have already sold that stake for all we know.
Edit- Source for the above (Full Q&A: Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Recode Decode):
All right. So the challenge you face is financial, though. Getting funding and stuff like that. And you’ve gotten ... Saudis had bought a big bunch of your stock, that’s just separate, they —
They might have sold it, I don’t know.