Notice that they never pan out far enough for us to see the barrel that his suspenders are holding up.Good news. Antoon has lost the bow tie.
Caption contest: my entry
Two bums sitting on a log by the river, discussing the demise of Tesla
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Notice that they never pan out far enough for us to see the barrel that his suspenders are holding up.Good news. Antoon has lost the bow tie.
Caption contest: my entry
Two bums sitting on a log by the river, discussing the demise of Tesla
Subpoena from SEC only, not DOJ.
From 10-Q (I presume is the source)
US regulators subpoenaed Tesla production data, company says
November 2, 2018 at 7:48 AM CDT - Updated November 2 at 7:48 AM
DETROIT (AP) — U.S. securities investigators have subpoenaed information from Tesla about production forecasts for the Model 3 electric car that were made last year, the company acknowledged in a regulatory filing Friday.
The disclosure in Tesla's quarterly financial report also says the Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena covered other public statements made about Model 3 production.
The filing also says Tesla is cooperating with a Justice Department request for information about production.
The Wall Street Journal reported last month that the FBI is doing a criminal investigation into whether Tesla misled investors by overstating Model 3 production forecasts.
Tesla Inc. says in the filing that to its knowledge, no government agency in an ongoing investigation has determined that it did anything wrong.
A company spokesman wouldn't comment beyond the filing.
appl dragging us down?
Tesla DIRECTOR - Amory Lovins
Book: Reinventing Fire
Really worth watching - intro 2:40 and talks begins 2:45
The 10-Q shows that they have definitely abandoned any plan for ramping to 10,000/week at Fremont next year, due to planning 3000/week in China. The media is so far reporting this as a positive (production in China), but there might start to be some negative news if they realise that this is actually a reduction in US production plans.
Hmm, good point - I did a volume comparison, but a mass comparison would be better.
Excellent post. But you might want to correct this to avoid reader confusionSeptember (1st month in previous quarter)
Thanksgiving in the USA is coming up. THAT is going to be major for the Tesla marketing effort. There will be many, many Model 3's travelling long distances to family reunions and lots of discussion about how good it is, and lots of demos and test drives. The kind of marketing Audi, Ford, BMW, Chevy, Jaguar, Mercedes and all of the rest of them can't buy - positive word of mouth.It's Friday. On weekends people gather and talk about "stuff", like their amazing new Model 3, or their Tesla stock that is up 33% in one week and is gonna rocket in 100 days. If I was a short, weekends would make me nervous.
I've mentioned before that my dream vehicle is one that goes to extremes on both efficiency and functionality simultaneously. So a very high-clearance, beat-it-up vehicle that doesn't need to be super-roomy inside, but has a long cargo area in the rear that when shrouded doubles as the rear taper, in order to get an extremely low drag coefficient. Extreme bonus points if the height of the rear shroud can be adjusted (with sliding walls) so you can choose between interior room (potentially with fold-up seats) or a super-low drag coefficient, based on your needs at the time.
I see mid-size as comprising smaller 3 rows and larger 2 rows. I actually owned a highlander before the 3. Our other options were Explorer, Edge, Enclave, and Forerunner. Even though I loved my 3 series I didn't bother looking at the BMW SUVs.Musk specifically calling it a midsize SUV is interesting - midsize SUV means things like the Explorer, Pilot, and Highlander are the non-luxury competition, and those are solidly three-row. (Midsize luxury SUVs are often two-row though.)
Agreed. A vast majority of people care nothing about ruggedness, they just want something big that isn't a minivan.He has said in the past it would a 6 seater. Your last suggestion sounds interesting, but probably over complicated. Still nice to dream...
The 10-Q shows that they have definitely abandoned any plan for ramping to 10,000/week at Fremont next year, due to planning 3000/week in China. The media is so far reporting this as a positive (production in China), but there might start to be some negative news if they realise that this is actually a reduction in US production plans.
I believe they'll start making Model 3's in Shanghai next year already - and they might be able to ramp up Fremont to more than 7,000/week with "minimal capex".
I don't think that's accurate - this is from their 10-Q:
"We are continuing to work to increase Model 3 production to approximately 10,000 units per week in the most optimal manner from both a timing and capital expenditures perspective. At the Fremont Factory, we expect to continue to increase our Model 3 production rate to approximately 7,000 units per week with only limited additional capital expenditures, and we believe we can increase that rate to beyond 7,000 units per week with incremental capital expenditures. In China, which is the largest market for electric vehicles in the world, our Model S and Model X sales have been, and will likely continue to be, negatively impacted by recently-increased tariffs imposed by the Chinese government on U.S.-manufactured vehicles. We are seeking to alleviate the impact of such tariffs for Model 3 by developing plans to start producing approximately 3,000 Model 3 vehicles per week in Shanghai, China in the initial phase of our Gigafactory 3, which will have progressively increased levels of localization through local sourcing and manufacturing. However, the timeframe for that is subject to a number of uncertainties, including regulatory approval, supply chain constraints, and the pace of bringing the factory online. Ultimately, achieving increased Model 3 production cost-effectively will require that we timely address any additional bottlenecks that may arise as we continue to ramp, achieve reduced labor hours and increase supplier capacity."
I believe they'll start making Model 3's in Shanghai next year already - and they might be able to ramp up Fremont to more than 7,000/week with "minimal capex".
They already made 5,300 in a week at the end of Q3, most of which were AWD, which are significantly more complex to make than RWD versions. It's only another 1,700/week on top of that to reach 7,000 - so I believe their 7,000/week target is conservative.