You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because I appreciate his enthusiasm. I wouldn't call them "delusional", if M3 ramp had gone according to plan then much of what he said may actually have come to pass. So not delusional, just on the upper-end of optimistic.
It's not for any of us here to advise anyone else how to invest. Neither is anyone here responsible for how anyone else invests.
Given slightly different parameters, the SP could have easily gone past 400 last year and TT007 would have been called a "visionary". Easy to criticise in hindsight.
I believe they are still getting solar panel some somewhere else. Seem like all only want to manufacture premium panels and solar roofs. Which to me seem logical, since the margin for solar panel are very thin. Solar-city is more specialized on installations. Taking on the premium market and installation or building a ecosystem of home-auto relationship is much important than manufacture panels. Which is more important - best at manufacture solar panel, or add the battery and power managing app into the home.
Perhaps some would have hailed him as such. I and others would likely have been very pleased, but considered him little more than a broken clock. The man screams parabolic movement once a week. Most on this forum are long and expect a significant upside. We just don't do it with a blind fervor. I wish TT well, but the mans track record is terrible. Seems like a nice guy, but thats about it.
In a world full of Tesla FUD, I love his optimism. Apologies for that, but it always brightens-up my day, regardless of how far-fetched it may appear.
On a brighter note. I was totally wrong about solar city. The CA ruling changed scty's prospect. That was a great acquisition for anyone who got in at the merger discount.
Exactly, and imagine what happens when many other states follow California's solar lead. Brighter note indeed![]()
I don't think Tesla will attempt to cut Panasonic out of the loop. They have a very deep and mutually beneficial cooperation.Hey guys, kind of off topic here. But in the future will Tesla continue to leverage Panasonic for battery production or will thesle get into the game themselves?
The next logical step is all new roof permits for existing homes,condos,and apartments less than 4 stories high will require solar.
Cannot be answered by a single $ figure. It is a 2 dimensional function depending on time and $.
E.g. if it went up to $1500 next week, I would sell, but if it goes to $1500 in 10 years I would still be holding.
IMHO, right now at current risk levels a realistic value would be around $450, so below that it is a good buy. Significantly higher now would be a good selling point. But as various products are released and ramped, the realistic value should be going up considerably. If at any point the price goes much higher than what I consider realistic value for that time, I would sell.
The next logical step is all new roof permits for existing homes,condos,and apartments less than 4 stories high will require solar.
Which states would be more likely to follow California in the near term in adopting similar requirements?
For a permit to replace a roof on an existing single family residence?
Japan's Panasonic says it could make batteries with Tesla in China
Japan's Panasonic says it could make batteries with Tesla in China
Panasonic Corp (6752.T) could jointly produce batteries with U.S. electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) in China, as the Japanese electronics conglomerate looks to tap into that country’s surging EV demand, its chief executive said on Thursday.
“As already reported, Tesla could in the future launch full-fledged production in China - and we could produce jointly,” Kazuhiro Tsuga said at an earnings briefing, in Panasonic’s first official acknowledgement of possible battery cell production for Tesla in the world’s biggest auto market.