The only things the I-pace beats the 3 on is ride height, ground clearance and number of buttons/ knobs.
Plus of course legendary Jaguar electronics
I doubt seriously that Lucas built any of that system! LOL
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only things the I-pace beats the 3 on is ride height, ground clearance and number of buttons/ knobs.
Plus of course legendary Jaguar electronics
Very OT, but as mentioned, went to the launch of the i-Pace today. For sure it’s a nice car, but much smaller then you’d imagine given the external size - about the same as my wife's C-Max I reckon.
Nicely finished as you’d expect from Jaguar, superb seats, lots of brushed aluminium and chrome in the interior. And I’m sure I’ve seen door-handles like that somewhere before.
Summary: shiny but tiny...
Thanks for the pix and comments. I have a Model 3 on order, but it's been delayed so long I am considering switching to the Jaguar.
I'm interested in your impression about the interior size. Externally, we know it's nearly identical in footprint to the Tesla Model 3, though somewhat taller than the 3. I'd expect the interior therefore to be also similar to Model 3, though more cluttered as you say than the 3's more open interior design. Do you feel it's smaller than a Model 3 inside? Or same size with some of the open space used up by consoles and storage and such?
Back on topic after this...
Any OTA updates? What is range?The only things the I-pace beats the 3 on is ride height, ground clearance and number of buttons/ knobs.
Plus of course legendary Jaguar electronics
*And I know that some tooling is depreciated per unit produced, but some is not, it's depreciated over time, hence margin pressure at the very begging of using new capex...
Apologies - from 10kAs of December 31, 2017, the estimated productive life for Model S and X tooling was 250,000 vehicles based on our current estimates of production. As of December 31, 2017, the estimated productive life for Model 3 tooling was 1,000,000 vehicles based on our current estimates of production.
Mod: thanks for a useful contribution. When quoting something one should say where it's quoted from, either a link or "From Tesla's 2018 10-K" or whatever. --ggr.
Any OTA updates? What is range?
Range is a number that quantifies how far your electric car can go.
Used in a sentence:
"I have seventy-five miles of range! Golly!"
(Sorry, I probably had one too many chocolate milks just now. I kid, I kid).
We'll see 10k when the Model Y starts production in my opinion. Or a Chinese factory is up and running. Whichever is first. End 2019?
Well, Q3 is looking tight, so they will probably not expend big capex in Q3, but Q4 is really looking like a safe source of profit (I trust luvb2b's model) and that's probably enough to start duplicating the bits which need to be duplicated. I bet they try to speed up the body line rather than duplicating it, but I think they'll duplicate other bottlenecks.Not sure who you're discussing this with, but we'll be lucky to see 7.5K by the end of the year. Remember, Tesla basically abandoned any guidance for 10K, and was very fuzzy 'wait and see' last time this question was asked (in CC I think)
My speculations is that they'll go very lightweight on capex and we'll see only 6K, maybe 6.5K, whatever they can squeeze out of existing lines. This is a pure speculation; if they have more money or easy access to capital through additional credit lines, I'll be probably wrong, as they'll spend more and get further...
Some estimates are that it's going to be in line with the loss in Q1, only a little worse. Cash flow shuld be a lot worse, but GAAP profit/loss...However, another disadvantage of additional large capex (only when it's put in use!) is that it would pressure margins again, and I feel @neroden is right with speculation that Tesla will want to be added to S&P500 ASAP, for which it needs Q3, Q4, and Q1/'19 to be profitable, and overall Q2+Q3+Q4+Q1/'19 > 0, i.e. profit from the last three quarters should be greater than loss in Q2. And loss in Q2 is going to be gigantic.
I've been thinking about this since Brian raised it a few months ago. Of course, if the conversion rate is anywhere below the relevant option-set price the people will convert However, there are a number of complications for the board:
1 A capital raise by this method is still a capital raise - it will show that Musk was wrong when he said no capital needed or wanted;
2 While the larger players will know about and expect this, a number of mid-level investors will not and will be negatively surprised by the dilution;
3 This will cause strong demand for puts and therefore may increase shorting - so leading the board to want to price the conversion lower; and
4 While a lot of converts have this feature it's rarely used - I think it would be seen as a sign of financial distress.
So, all in all, it's not quite as simple as it sounds.
Since the pattern is so obvious, why don't longs make money off of them? It seems to be easy: Sell as soon as the number of twitter posts by bears rises above x/hr and journalists publish more than 1 negative article in a day, sell, wait, buy. 15% profit/week.
It may be wishful thinking, but what about if he knows about either a criminal complaint or a lawsuit against Chanos for market manipulation - would that count as material, non-public information?
I’m not selling, ever! Maybe some when stock is at $1,750. But not much.Investors betting against Tesla are getting killed but not for the reason you may think: Cramer
More explaination of Tesla in the market.
Investors betting against Tesla are getting killed but not for the reason you may think: Cramer
More explaination of Tesla in the market.
Maybe. If the information was *public* then it would certainly not count. Often such information is public, just not noticed by most people.
Shorts have been killing us longs for over a year now. That's how long TSLA has been trading sideways with wild peaks and valleys. The only people making money are the swing traders and they have made a mint. Meanwhile the longs (and shorts) are wondering when the wild ride will end.According to Cramer “longs are unshakable.”
This is why shorts are getting killed, their leader (Chanos) doesn’t produce any goods, whereas Tesla is manufacturing the best car in the world. The Model 3 at 5,000/week will own up to 30-40% of the mid-size luxury market share. This is huge considering how big the automobile market is.