Care bear in da house!
Not in my house! He has joined a whole host of shorts in the very stinky, ****-filled outhouse.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Care bear in da house!
This is completely FUD! There is not a single data point given in this post that supports your point - only jargons like "Quick ration of 0.37..." to make it sounds crediable. luvb2b has a comprehansive model (q2-q4 2018 financial projections) that shows 3.47B cash at the end of year after 400M debt payment. The cash balanace will probably increase another 0.5B or so after Q1 2019 - this is more than enough to pay off the 800M-900M due in Q1 2019. If you don't agree with the model feel free to make your argument there with numbers.At the end of the day, its solvency risk - debt due at the end of the year and march 2019. The later could be paid with stock as i recall if the price is 350 or above. Quick ratio of .37, they need to garner CFO quickly. An equity raise could have helped bridge the gap, but with a DOJ investigation, this becomes more difficult.
I would become long if the business case made sense. I do not think musk is the right CEO for this company. Ironically enough if he left, the price would take a hit. I might buy after structuring if they become a buyout target, which is always possible if the price is right. I might also go long if the charts look good, even if its for a quick trade. But for now, I am hanging tight.
Of course there was no such requirement.Incorrectly. There was no requirement nor expectation that Elon lay out every possible risk factor in contract legalese.
Me too. This thread is getting littered with a lot of garbage.
Insolvency risk is effectively 0. Elon Musk could raise 2 billion dollars with text message to one of his friends.At the end of the day, its solvency risk
But for now, I am hanging tight.
I think his wording was misleading. SEC may fine him. I don't see where it gets to a criminal level. The criminal probe does not seem unreasonable, but I can't think of a realistic scenario where Elon committed a criminal act with his tweets. Does anyone have a reasonable scenario where Elon may be criminally liable for his tweets?Of course there was no such requirement.
However, since Elon DID very specifically state that there WERE no other contingencies, there WAS a requirement that his statement be truthful. Or if mistaken, promptly withdrawn and corrected.
Look, if you refuse to look directly at the problem, and remain determined to squint hard enough to see some loophole for Elon here, then fine, I'm never going to convince you. But for myself, I still think Elon's at risk, and there may well be consequences. I guess we'll all have to wait to find out how DOJ sees things. And if necessary, the courts.
And what if it gets taken private or bought out at $390? Could happen tomorrow.$TSLA January 2021 options became available as of yesterday
I had been waiting for January 2021 calls and as soon as I noticed today I immediately switched ALL my January 2019 calls to January 2021 $400 calls
There is no way this stock will stay below $400 over the next 28 months
Shorts can try their best I’m betting everything on $400 January 2021 calls
Period
Why chickened out so far into 2021? Next 2-3 quarters are going to be at the heart of the ramp up, profitable, increasing margin. I’m holding Jan 2020 $325 but at this price I’m thinking to convert some calls the opposite way which is June 2019.$TSLA January 2021 options became available as of yesterday
I had been waiting for January 2021 calls and as soon as I noticed today I immediately switched ALL my January 2019 calls to January 2021 $400 calls
There is no way this stock will stay below $400 over the next 28 months
Shorts can try their best I’m betting everything on $400 January 2021 calls
Period
That is obviously NOT going to happen. We just went through this song and dance. Are you paying attention to how Elon operates or what?And what if it gets taken private or bought out at $390? Could happen tomorrow.
I don't think it will lead to anything criminally. I also do think, given the publicity, the DOJ & SEC would be negligent not to PROBE it. But actually taking it to prosecution would be unfathomable unless Elon wrote some really stupid things.I think his wording was misleading. SEC may fine him. I don't see where it gets to a criminal level. The criminal probe does not seem unreasonable, but I can't think of a realistic scenario where Elon committed a criminal act with his tweets. Does anyone have a reasonable scenario where Elon may be criminally liable for his tweets?
Insolvency risk is effectively 0. Elon Musk could raise 2 billion dollars with text message to one of his friends.
That is obviously NOT going to happen. We just went through this song and dance. Are you paying attention to how Elon operates or what?
I think his wording was misleading. SEC may fine him. I don't see where it gets to a criminal level. The criminal probe does not seem unreasonable, but I can't think of a realistic scenario where Elon committed a criminal act with his tweets. Does anyone have a reasonable scenario where Elon may be criminally liable for his tweets?
Most of life is how we chose to respond. I post here infrequently because this place represents a different view point than my own. If you wish to apply some label to it ( troll fud whatever) thats on you. Personally someone elses views don't really bother me. If the moderators want to ban me, thats okay.
As for today, I am not sure how anyone can hold a meaningful position long in this stock without taking into account the real risks associated with whats going on. Does this news not effect your outlook on the company? What, if any, catalyst be needed for you to change your mind? I am genuinely curious. As a short seller, my opinion would change if the company got a new CEO and was structurally profitable on a sustained basis. I was considering covering part of my short ( at a handsome profit i might add) if they were able to report healthy demand in M3, ingoing demand, positive FCF, and start paying off the albratross of debt due in one year. The numbers are plain for all to see - 3 billion in accounts payable, short term debt of 2 billion, less than 1.3 billion in cash ( net deposits), and a bottom line burn of 700 million quarterly. You can read them on tesla's own 10q.
good luck
Perhap rich oil bastards have connections to DOJ, pushing them to do a voluntary inquiry in an effort to damage Tesla, but as Tesla said, this should end quickly. There are no bases for further subpoena. Not a lawyer.This DOJ investigation is complete bs. These issues are best handled by the SEC. I hope these journalists work their sources at the DOJ and figure out what the hell they're going for. Any suggestions what the DOJ is thinking?
Jon McNeill on TwitterWe are celebrating 1 Billion rides today by surprising thousands of drivers with a free tank of gas. @lyft loves our drivers! Thank you to our drivers and passengers -- onto the next Billion!
Someone pass the rope.
Of course there was no such requirement.
However, since Elon DID very specifically state that there WERE no other contingencies, there WAS a requirement that his statement be truthful. Or if mistaken, promptly withdrawn and corrected.
There are always risks, a corrupted system could find fault where there is none.Look, if you refuse to look directly at the problem, and remain determined to squint hard enough to see some loophole for Elon here, then fine, I'm never going to convince you. But for myself, I still think Elon's at risk, and there may well be consequences. I guess we'll all have to wait to find out how DOJ sees things. And if necessary, the courts.