I'm not sure if this is the case.
I remember seeing hurricanes go through the Gulf of Mexico, drilling platforms get shut down for a little while and the price of gasoline skyrocketting. Price wouldn't come back down until Exxon, etc. would report record profits for the quarter (and prices would have to come down once the cat was out of the bag). In other words, the hurricane wasn't the reason for the price hikes, it was a convenient excuse for those who wanted to hike the prices. Effect following cause, not the other way around.
For years, I've watched the price wars between the TSLA bulls and the short sellers, Musk vs the media, FUD all over the place and seen TSLA move in completely inexplicable ways over and over again. Then, after it happens, we try to come up with the reason for it. I pretty much think that "they" decide that the price is going to move because "they" make a lot of money on volatility, and the causes that get ascribed to it are just reasonable sounding myths, not really reasons.
Recently, the wild swings that we've always seen in TSLA over the last six years are happening to the market as a whole. My theory, for what it's worth (probably not much), is that the market has decided that what works profitably on individual stocks (manipulated volatility) works even better on the whole market, and that is what we are seeing. I think, again, for what it's worth, that the market grabs onto a piece of news and decides they can use that news to create a market manipulation. How many times in the last year have we seen the Market drop significantly and it gets blamed on Tariff wars, only to see it recover two days later? Are we really supposed to believe that after a decent meal and a good night's sleep, everyone decided that they weren't as scared about the tariffs as they thought they were the day before? It would be interesting to know on the volatile days, what is the percentage gain or loss for the big guys vs what happens to the little guys.
With that said, go back and think through everything that was said after the market tanked on Monday and determine if anything that refuted those positions changed between Monday and today, because if it doesn't explain both the drop and the surge, then it's not really the reason. I would assert that nothing happened between Monday morning and Wednesday afternoon that explains both the big drop and the big rally. Not in the tariff negotiations, not in the economy, not in the government shutdown, not in the level of political uncertainty, not in the POTUS. Nothing.
As much as I'd like to be wrong, I get more and more cynical in my old age. Anybody that has a theory that explains both sides of this week, please educate me.