stopcrazypp
Well-Known Member
He makes a fair point that in this case California only got that right due to an explicit federal waiver, not because of state rights.Admittedly I missed that story however California never lost its right to regulate emissions and the current administration stopped fighting the case.
That case made great points that can probably apply here. Basically the plaintiffs had to prove that the law discriminated against interstate commerce in order to apply the Commerce Clause. A specious argument that it affects interstate commerce would not have been enough.There was a recent case California won where the plaintiff claimed that the Low Carbon Fuel Standard violated the Commerce Clause.
I can see the same issue with things like no turn on red. Given that local law applies to all vehicles in the state (not just out of state vehicles), there is no argument to be made that it would discriminate against interstate commerce.