Morristhecat
Member
Hope SC
Hope is now open.
It's on the Tesla "Find Us" map
OMG! I don't believe it! Incredible...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hope SC
Hope is now open.
It's on the Tesla "Find Us" map
OMG! I don't believe it! Incredible...
So ... just for fun/speculation/rumour ... latest on supercharge.info shows 189 superchargers live, 14 in construction as of today. That means in the next 2-3 weeks we'll pass the 200 worldwide mark.
Squamish was #100 in North America, will another Canadian site be #200 worldwide? (ie., Hope?)
Also of interest, the first two superchargers went live in Japan today.
Ah, September 2014, back when there were fewer than 200 Superchargers world-wide.
Just a little unusual combination of companiesRED DEER CONSTRUCTION :Interesting choice of contractors.Why? Something wrong?
On the 2015 Supercharger map, it appears there are plans for an SC site in the vicinity of Great Falls, MT. From Great Falls to Calgary the distance is about 320 miles / 515 km, so it does seem likely that Tesla will fill this gap in the medium term. I agree that it would be best if drivers from the south can continue on to the Canadian Rockies (as my family has done) or to Edmonton on Superchargers, without having to stop and charge at a hotel or campground around Calgary. When this is factored in, and if you count the projected SC in Great Falls, then 3-4 Superchargers does seem right.However, to have realistic distances between Superchargers, they need to be no more than 133 miles apart. Canmore to Butte is 530 miles. If you could space the Supercharger sites perfectly, that would require 3 Superchargers, and in reality, you would probably need 4. I still think that it's worth 4 Superchargers to complete the loop, and not leave a peninsula.
Hope SC
Hope is now open.
It's on the Tesla "Find Us" map
So... there is Hope!
Also - I just listed it on PlugShare - but - since we can't actually ADD a Supercharger Listing - I used the HPWC - so to mark it as a place Holder - so anyone can now add pictures and if needed add any detailed edits - before we get PlugShare Staff to edit/upgrade it to be a Supercharger Site.Great news! Can someone confirm this who is in the area?
I hope you guys are correct in your predictions, but I will be the pessimist here. I'll expect it to be hooked up first week of December. Hopefully I am wrong. Unfortunately it will be harder to coordinate an opening party with the weather now.
The Best Bet for that run - would be the Hope SC, followed by a Top Up at the Merritt Visitor Info Centre DCQC (If he gets the Adapter for CHAdeMO to SC), then take 97C over to Kelowna.Has anyone heard anything new about the possibility of a SC in the Kelowna area? I have a friend that would buy a Model X if he could drive to Kelowna and back the same day. He makes the trip once a week and does 50k km/yr, but the lack of SCs is the deal breaker. He has driven my Model S and loves it. I guess the lost sales are not a huge incentive for Tesla as long as they are supply constrained.
- - - Updated - - -I see Tesla Added Hope, BC as live yesterday, so I added a Tesla HPWC Model S listing for it today - Hope Supercharger | Hope, BC | Electric Car Charging Station | PlugShare
I'm just saying that Tesla is neither a public utility nor a charity. I don't expect them to install superchargers where it does not make economic sense to them. The value proposition of owning a Tesla in Saskatoon is different from that of LA and will be for a long time to come. I understand how much a supercharger can benefit those nearby, but intensity of desire is not a business case.
Hey hey, now. What about us Americans who want to traverse Canada in our Teslas? We, too, feel we have a right to be indignant that Tesla hasn't even published a map showing that they intend to connect the two sides of your country together. ;-)
...
*I mostly mean they should follow the TransCanadian highway for locating SCs. There are vast expanses in Canada where it doesn't make sense to build SCs because the population density is too low.
And - I would ask - is it not possible to build a station site with just TWO Heads on the Supercharger - with one feed, and make it a planned for expansion to 4 heads and later 6 heads, should the need warrant it? Could that not alleviate much of the cost of a sites build out, and allow Sites to be placed at reasonable distances
I think Cottonwood the Magnificent can address this in more detail, but the short answer I think is: no.
There is no decrease in overhead (permitting, setting up a construction site, dealing with land owners and utilities etc.) putting in a two-station supercharger as opposed to a 4, 6, 8, 10 etc. Especially if you want to leave space in an equipment enclosure to add more superchargers later.
There is no decrease in overhead (permitting, setting up a construction site, dealing with land owners and utilities etc.) putting in a two-station supercharger as opposed to a 4, 6, 8, 10 etc. Especially if you want to leave space in an equipment enclosure to add more superchargers later.
This doesn't seem to be the case in France, where all of the 16 current sites have only 2 stalls. Does anyone know what is different there?