You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anything that claims to be ‘vegan’ ironically.
I don't think we need to wonder about it honestly. It is a marketing move, not an environmental one.You also have to wonder about Tesla's environmental choice over switching to vegan 'leather', particularly since the world seems to be moving to having a surplus supply of hides from its beef consumption.
America is obsessed with beef. But it has no use for hides, so leather prices plunge
A glut of cowhides has caused leather prices to plummet.www.latimes.com
Wow, that is a heck of a lot of fossil fuels for an electric car.Are you asking what components are derived from petrol products? The answer is approximately 775lbs
Wow, that is a heck of a lot of fossil fuels for an electric car.
Fossil Fuels is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources. components ≠ fuel/energy thus your question results in an ⚠︎.
I wonder how far Tesla is behind Polestar on this issue
Tesla used to use Cow Leather in their cars, my 2014 Model S has cow leather, but were persuaded to change to “Vegan Leather“ as a result of shareholder action supported by PETA. So more an animal rights or response to shareholder concerns type reason. But I’m sure marketing benefits supported the move.I don't think we need to wonder about it honestly. It is a marketing move, not an environmental one.
"Vegan" sells, even if it is worse for the environment. Maybe "organic friendly" would market as well as vegan.
You're throwing around a bit of mis-information. I've directly cited teslas impact statement which answers your question. You just need to read it.Wow, that is a heck of a lot of fossil fuels for an electric car.
I wonder how far Tesla is behind Polestar on this issue
You're throwing around a bit of mis-information. I've directly cited teslas impact statement which answers your question. You just need to read it.
Their impact statement explains that fossil use is upstream from tesla in material refinement, which they need to bring inhouse eventually.
This is the polestar report: https://www.polestar.com/dato-assets/11286/1682594257-polestar_sustainabilityreport_2022_eng.pdf
On page 28 it looks like almost 30 CO2e per car for polstar, whereas with the tesla report its actually stated in grams (gCO2e) at 68? It seems crazy that tesla produces many thousands of times less emissions than polstar so maybe i dont understant the units correctly
That’s lifetime co2. I was just looking at the manufactuing which was op question.Tesla on page 57, 37 ton CO2e per vehicle
Polestar on page 29, 45 ton CO2e per vehicle
I think this is reasonably similar since they have taken different energy source for the e
In that case would be roughly 16 for tesla and 18 for polestar. Rough estimate from the graph.That’s lifetime co2. I was just looking at the manufactuing which was op question.
Yep, 100%. Sure, PETA (can't stand that organization...) did the persuasion, but I think Tesla was easily swayed as the Vegan leather is looked at as more sustainable (maybe false?).Tesla used to use Cow Leather in their cars, my 2014 Model S has cow leather, but were persuaded to change to “Vegan Leather“ as a result of shareholder action supported by PETA. So more an animal rights or response to shareholder concerns type reason. But I’m sure marketing benefits supported the move.
Tesla Moves to Fully Vegan, Leather-Free Interiors in Model 3 and Upcoming Model Y
A years-long, shareholder-led push to drive Tesla away from leather luxury is getting closer to reality.www.caranddriver.com